Cargando…
Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence?
Pain, though unpleasant, is adaptive in calling an animal’s attention to potential tissue damage. A long list of animals representing diverse taxa possess venom-mediated, pain-inducing bites or stings that work by co-opting the pain-sensing pathways of potential enemies. Typically, such venoms inclu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12040260 |
_version_ | 1783535357746216960 |
---|---|
author | Niermann, Crystal N. Tate, Travis G. Suto, Amber L. Barajas, Rolando White, Hope A. Guswiler, Olivia D. Secor, Stephen M. Rowe, Ashlee H. Rowe, Matthew P. |
author_facet | Niermann, Crystal N. Tate, Travis G. Suto, Amber L. Barajas, Rolando White, Hope A. Guswiler, Olivia D. Secor, Stephen M. Rowe, Ashlee H. Rowe, Matthew P. |
author_sort | Niermann, Crystal N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pain, though unpleasant, is adaptive in calling an animal’s attention to potential tissue damage. A long list of animals representing diverse taxa possess venom-mediated, pain-inducing bites or stings that work by co-opting the pain-sensing pathways of potential enemies. Typically, such venoms include toxins that cause tissue damage or disrupt neuronal activity, rendering painful stings honest indicators of harm. But could pain alone be sufficient for deterring a hungry predator? Some venomologists have argued “no”; predators, in the absence of injury, would “see through” the bluff of a painful but otherwise benign sting or bite. Because most algogenic venoms are also toxic (although not vice versa), it has been difficult to disentangle the relative contributions of each component to predator deterrence. Southern grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus) are voracious predators of arthropods, feeding on a diversity of scorpion species whose stings vary in painfulness, including painful Arizona bark scorpions (Centruroides sculpturatus) and essentially painless stripe-tailed scorpions (Paravaejovis spinigerus). Moreover, southern grasshopper mice have evolved resistance to the lethal toxins in bark scorpion venom, rendering a sting from these scorpions painful but harmless. Results from a series of laboratory experiments demonstrate that painful stings matter. Grasshopper mice preferred to prey on stripe-tailed scorpions rather than bark scorpions when both species could sting; the preference disappeared when each species had their stingers blocked. A painful sting therefore appears necessary for a scorpion to deter a hungry grasshopper mouse, but it may not always be sufficient: after first attacking and consuming a painless stripe-tailed scorpion, many grasshopper mice went on to attack, kill, and eat a bark scorpion even when the scorpion was capable of stinging. Defensive venoms that result in tissue damage or neurological dysfunction may, thus, be required to condition greater aversion than venoms causing pain alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7232307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72323072020-05-22 Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence? Niermann, Crystal N. Tate, Travis G. Suto, Amber L. Barajas, Rolando White, Hope A. Guswiler, Olivia D. Secor, Stephen M. Rowe, Ashlee H. Rowe, Matthew P. Toxins (Basel) Article Pain, though unpleasant, is adaptive in calling an animal’s attention to potential tissue damage. A long list of animals representing diverse taxa possess venom-mediated, pain-inducing bites or stings that work by co-opting the pain-sensing pathways of potential enemies. Typically, such venoms include toxins that cause tissue damage or disrupt neuronal activity, rendering painful stings honest indicators of harm. But could pain alone be sufficient for deterring a hungry predator? Some venomologists have argued “no”; predators, in the absence of injury, would “see through” the bluff of a painful but otherwise benign sting or bite. Because most algogenic venoms are also toxic (although not vice versa), it has been difficult to disentangle the relative contributions of each component to predator deterrence. Southern grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus) are voracious predators of arthropods, feeding on a diversity of scorpion species whose stings vary in painfulness, including painful Arizona bark scorpions (Centruroides sculpturatus) and essentially painless stripe-tailed scorpions (Paravaejovis spinigerus). Moreover, southern grasshopper mice have evolved resistance to the lethal toxins in bark scorpion venom, rendering a sting from these scorpions painful but harmless. Results from a series of laboratory experiments demonstrate that painful stings matter. Grasshopper mice preferred to prey on stripe-tailed scorpions rather than bark scorpions when both species could sting; the preference disappeared when each species had their stingers blocked. A painful sting therefore appears necessary for a scorpion to deter a hungry grasshopper mouse, but it may not always be sufficient: after first attacking and consuming a painless stripe-tailed scorpion, many grasshopper mice went on to attack, kill, and eat a bark scorpion even when the scorpion was capable of stinging. Defensive venoms that result in tissue damage or neurological dysfunction may, thus, be required to condition greater aversion than venoms causing pain alone. MDPI 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7232307/ /pubmed/32316477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12040260 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Niermann, Crystal N. Tate, Travis G. Suto, Amber L. Barajas, Rolando White, Hope A. Guswiler, Olivia D. Secor, Stephen M. Rowe, Ashlee H. Rowe, Matthew P. Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence? |
title | Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence? |
title_full | Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence? |
title_fullStr | Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence? |
title_full_unstemmed | Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence? |
title_short | Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence? |
title_sort | defensive venoms: is pain sufficient for predator deterrence? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12040260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niermanncrystaln defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence AT tatetravisg defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence AT sutoamberl defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence AT barajasrolando defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence AT whitehopea defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence AT guswileroliviad defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence AT secorstephenm defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence AT roweashleeh defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence AT rowematthewp defensivevenomsispainsufficientforpredatordeterrence |