Cargando…

Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements

Pharmacogenomic drug labels in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) provide an instrument for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. We compared pharmacogenomic guidance by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG), the US...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shekhani, Rawan, Steinacher, Linda, Swen, Jesse J., Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31715018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1720
_version_ 1783535465778905088
author Shekhani, Rawan
Steinacher, Linda
Swen, Jesse J.
Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus
author_facet Shekhani, Rawan
Steinacher, Linda
Swen, Jesse J.
Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus
author_sort Shekhani, Rawan
collection PubMed
description Pharmacogenomic drug labels in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) provide an instrument for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. We compared pharmacogenomic guidance by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and by the European agencies the European Medicines Agency (EMA), College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen Medicines Evaluation Board (CBG‐MEB), and Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (FIDMD), collectively assigned as EMA/FIDMD+MEB shortened as EMA/FM. Of 54 drugs with an actionable gene–drug interaction in the CPIC and DPWG guidelines, only 50% had actionable pharmacogenomic information in the SmPCs and the agencies were in agreement in only 18% of the cases. We further compared 450 additional drugs, lacking CPIC or DPWG guidance, and found 126 actionable gene–drug labels by the FDA and/or the EMA/FM. Based on these 126 drugs in addition to the 54 above, the consensus of actionable pharmacogenomic labeling between the FDA and the EMA/FM was only 54%. In conclusion, guidelines provided by CPIC/DPWG are only partly implemented into the SmPCs and the implementation of pharmacogenomic drug labels into the clinics would strongly gain from a higher extent of consensus between agencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7232863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72328632020-05-19 Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements Shekhani, Rawan Steinacher, Linda Swen, Jesse J. Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus Clin Pharmacol Ther Research Pharmacogenomic drug labels in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) provide an instrument for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. We compared pharmacogenomic guidance by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and by the European agencies the European Medicines Agency (EMA), College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen Medicines Evaluation Board (CBG‐MEB), and Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (FIDMD), collectively assigned as EMA/FIDMD+MEB shortened as EMA/FM. Of 54 drugs with an actionable gene–drug interaction in the CPIC and DPWG guidelines, only 50% had actionable pharmacogenomic information in the SmPCs and the agencies were in agreement in only 18% of the cases. We further compared 450 additional drugs, lacking CPIC or DPWG guidance, and found 126 actionable gene–drug labels by the FDA and/or the EMA/FM. Based on these 126 drugs in addition to the 54 above, the consensus of actionable pharmacogenomic labeling between the FDA and the EMA/FM was only 54%. In conclusion, guidelines provided by CPIC/DPWG are only partly implemented into the SmPCs and the implementation of pharmacogenomic drug labels into the clinics would strongly gain from a higher extent of consensus between agencies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-17 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7232863/ /pubmed/31715018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1720 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Shekhani, Rawan
Steinacher, Linda
Swen, Jesse J.
Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus
Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements
title Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements
title_full Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements
title_fullStr Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements
title_short Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements
title_sort evaluation of current regulation and guidelines of pharmacogenomic drug labels: opportunities for improvements
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31715018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1720
work_keys_str_mv AT shekhanirawan evaluationofcurrentregulationandguidelinesofpharmacogenomicdruglabelsopportunitiesforimprovements
AT steinacherlinda evaluationofcurrentregulationandguidelinesofpharmacogenomicdruglabelsopportunitiesforimprovements
AT swenjessej evaluationofcurrentregulationandguidelinesofpharmacogenomicdruglabelsopportunitiesforimprovements
AT ingelmansundbergmagnus evaluationofcurrentregulationandguidelinesofpharmacogenomicdruglabelsopportunitiesforimprovements