Cargando…
Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements
Pharmacogenomic drug labels in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) provide an instrument for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. We compared pharmacogenomic guidance by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG), the US...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31715018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1720 |
_version_ | 1783535465778905088 |
---|---|
author | Shekhani, Rawan Steinacher, Linda Swen, Jesse J. Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus |
author_facet | Shekhani, Rawan Steinacher, Linda Swen, Jesse J. Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus |
author_sort | Shekhani, Rawan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pharmacogenomic drug labels in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) provide an instrument for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. We compared pharmacogenomic guidance by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and by the European agencies the European Medicines Agency (EMA), College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen Medicines Evaluation Board (CBG‐MEB), and Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (FIDMD), collectively assigned as EMA/FIDMD+MEB shortened as EMA/FM. Of 54 drugs with an actionable gene–drug interaction in the CPIC and DPWG guidelines, only 50% had actionable pharmacogenomic information in the SmPCs and the agencies were in agreement in only 18% of the cases. We further compared 450 additional drugs, lacking CPIC or DPWG guidance, and found 126 actionable gene–drug labels by the FDA and/or the EMA/FM. Based on these 126 drugs in addition to the 54 above, the consensus of actionable pharmacogenomic labeling between the FDA and the EMA/FM was only 54%. In conclusion, guidelines provided by CPIC/DPWG are only partly implemented into the SmPCs and the implementation of pharmacogenomic drug labels into the clinics would strongly gain from a higher extent of consensus between agencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7232863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72328632020-05-19 Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements Shekhani, Rawan Steinacher, Linda Swen, Jesse J. Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus Clin Pharmacol Ther Research Pharmacogenomic drug labels in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) provide an instrument for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. We compared pharmacogenomic guidance by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and by the European agencies the European Medicines Agency (EMA), College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen Medicines Evaluation Board (CBG‐MEB), and Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (FIDMD), collectively assigned as EMA/FIDMD+MEB shortened as EMA/FM. Of 54 drugs with an actionable gene–drug interaction in the CPIC and DPWG guidelines, only 50% had actionable pharmacogenomic information in the SmPCs and the agencies were in agreement in only 18% of the cases. We further compared 450 additional drugs, lacking CPIC or DPWG guidance, and found 126 actionable gene–drug labels by the FDA and/or the EMA/FM. Based on these 126 drugs in addition to the 54 above, the consensus of actionable pharmacogenomic labeling between the FDA and the EMA/FM was only 54%. In conclusion, guidelines provided by CPIC/DPWG are only partly implemented into the SmPCs and the implementation of pharmacogenomic drug labels into the clinics would strongly gain from a higher extent of consensus between agencies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-17 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7232863/ /pubmed/31715018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1720 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Shekhani, Rawan Steinacher, Linda Swen, Jesse J. Ingelman‐Sundberg, Magnus Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements |
title | Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements |
title_full | Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements |
title_short | Evaluation of Current Regulation and Guidelines of Pharmacogenomic Drug Labels: Opportunities for Improvements |
title_sort | evaluation of current regulation and guidelines of pharmacogenomic drug labels: opportunities for improvements |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31715018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shekhanirawan evaluationofcurrentregulationandguidelinesofpharmacogenomicdruglabelsopportunitiesforimprovements AT steinacherlinda evaluationofcurrentregulationandguidelinesofpharmacogenomicdruglabelsopportunitiesforimprovements AT swenjessej evaluationofcurrentregulationandguidelinesofpharmacogenomicdruglabelsopportunitiesforimprovements AT ingelmansundbergmagnus evaluationofcurrentregulationandguidelinesofpharmacogenomicdruglabelsopportunitiesforimprovements |