Cargando…
Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical performance of a self-adhering flowable resin composite compared to a conventional flowable resin composite used with an etch&rinse adhesive system in minimally invasive Class I cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523153 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc54/1/2 |
_version_ | 1783535489764032512 |
---|---|
author | Oz, Fatma Dilsad Ergin, Esra Cakir, Filiz Yalcin Gurgan, Sevil |
author_facet | Oz, Fatma Dilsad Ergin, Esra Cakir, Filiz Yalcin Gurgan, Sevil |
author_sort | Oz, Fatma Dilsad |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical performance of a self-adhering flowable resin composite compared to a conventional flowable resin composite used with an etch&rinse adhesive system in minimally invasive Class I cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients received at least one pair of Class I restorations (n=65). After class I cavities had been prepared, they were randomly restored either with a self-adhering flowable resin composite (VertiseFlow/Kerr-VR) [Group-1 (n=33)], or with a flowable resin composite (Luxaflow/DMG-LX) in combination with an etch&rinse adhesive (Teco/DMG) [Group-2 (n=32)] according to the manufacturers' instructions. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and yearly during 5 years according to the FDI criteria by two evaluators. A statistical analysis was carried out using the Pearson Chi-Square test and the Cochran Q-test followed by the Mc Nemar's test (p=0.05). RESULTS: After 5 years a total of 47 restorations were evaluated with a recall rate of 68%. At 4-year, 3 (11.5%) VR and 2 LX (7.6%) restorations exhibited a cumulative retention loss. Seventeen (73.9%) VR and 14 LX (58.3%) restorations exhibited clinically acceptable (2) scores for marginal adaptation. At 5-year evaluations VR and LX showed similar results regarding all evaluated criteria (p > 0.05). The cumulative retention loss rates of VR and LX were 15.3% and 7.6%, respectively. None of the restorations demonstrated a recurrence of caries and post operative sensitivity. Both materials showed significant changes at 4 and 5 years regarding marginal staining when compared to baseline (p<0.001). Furthermore, significant changes were observed for VR and LX at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years for marginal adaptation according to baseline (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of both materials for the restoration of Class-I cavities demonstrated clinically acceptable performance at the end of 5-year. The self-adhering flowable composite exhibited a clinical performance similar to the conventional flowable applied with an etch&rinse adhesive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7233123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72331232020-06-09 Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Oz, Fatma Dilsad Ergin, Esra Cakir, Filiz Yalcin Gurgan, Sevil Acta Stomatol Croat Original Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical performance of a self-adhering flowable resin composite compared to a conventional flowable resin composite used with an etch&rinse adhesive system in minimally invasive Class I cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients received at least one pair of Class I restorations (n=65). After class I cavities had been prepared, they were randomly restored either with a self-adhering flowable resin composite (VertiseFlow/Kerr-VR) [Group-1 (n=33)], or with a flowable resin composite (Luxaflow/DMG-LX) in combination with an etch&rinse adhesive (Teco/DMG) [Group-2 (n=32)] according to the manufacturers' instructions. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and yearly during 5 years according to the FDI criteria by two evaluators. A statistical analysis was carried out using the Pearson Chi-Square test and the Cochran Q-test followed by the Mc Nemar's test (p=0.05). RESULTS: After 5 years a total of 47 restorations were evaluated with a recall rate of 68%. At 4-year, 3 (11.5%) VR and 2 LX (7.6%) restorations exhibited a cumulative retention loss. Seventeen (73.9%) VR and 14 LX (58.3%) restorations exhibited clinically acceptable (2) scores for marginal adaptation. At 5-year evaluations VR and LX showed similar results regarding all evaluated criteria (p > 0.05). The cumulative retention loss rates of VR and LX were 15.3% and 7.6%, respectively. None of the restorations demonstrated a recurrence of caries and post operative sensitivity. Both materials showed significant changes at 4 and 5 years regarding marginal staining when compared to baseline (p<0.001). Furthermore, significant changes were observed for VR and LX at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years for marginal adaptation according to baseline (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of both materials for the restoration of Class-I cavities demonstrated clinically acceptable performance at the end of 5-year. The self-adhering flowable composite exhibited a clinical performance similar to the conventional flowable applied with an etch&rinse adhesive. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7233123/ /pubmed/32523153 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc54/1/2 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Papers Oz, Fatma Dilsad Ergin, Esra Cakir, Filiz Yalcin Gurgan, Sevil Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial |
title | Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full | Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_short | Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable resin composite in minimally invasive class i cavities: 5-year results of a double blind randomized, controlled clinical trial |
topic | Original Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523153 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc54/1/2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozfatmadilsad clinicalevaluationofaselfadheringflowableresincompositeinminimallyinvasiveclassicavities5yearresultsofadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT erginesra clinicalevaluationofaselfadheringflowableresincompositeinminimallyinvasiveclassicavities5yearresultsofadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT cakirfilizyalcin clinicalevaluationofaselfadheringflowableresincompositeinminimallyinvasiveclassicavities5yearresultsofadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT gurgansevil clinicalevaluationofaselfadheringflowableresincompositeinminimallyinvasiveclassicavities5yearresultsofadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |