Cargando…

The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study

OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). METHODS: This methodological study consisted of 69 patients hospitalized in the palliative care (PC) service of three hospitals between June 2016 and August 2016, 69 carers who under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kocatepe, Vildan, Kayıkçı, Emel Emine, Saygılı, Ülkü, Yıldırım, Dilek, Can, Gülbeyaz, Örnek, Güngör
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478138
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_51_19
_version_ 1783535561033646080
author Kocatepe, Vildan
Kayıkçı, Emel Emine
Saygılı, Ülkü
Yıldırım, Dilek
Can, Gülbeyaz
Örnek, Güngör
author_facet Kocatepe, Vildan
Kayıkçı, Emel Emine
Saygılı, Ülkü
Yıldırım, Dilek
Can, Gülbeyaz
Örnek, Güngör
author_sort Kocatepe, Vildan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). METHODS: This methodological study consisted of 69 patients hospitalized in the palliative care (PC) service of three hospitals between June 2016 and August 2016, 69 carers who undertook continuously primary care of these patients, and 28 staff members working in the PC service and providing care to these patients. The data of the study were collected using the Personal Diagnosis Form, the POS. The scope, structure and criterion validity and internal consistency reliability of the scale were tested. Item analysis, Cronbach's alpha analysis, content validity ratio, confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity, criterion validity, patient validity, and intraclass correlation coefficient for the adaptation of outcomes of patient, carer, and staff groups were conducted. RESULTS: The content validity ratio of the scale was found to be higher than 0.80 for patient, carer, and staff questionnaires. Item-total score correlation coefficients were determined between 0.27 and 0.72 for the items in the patient questionnaire, 0.33–0.67 for the carer questionnaire, and 0.34–0.72 for the staff questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients were determined as 0.64 for the patient questionnaire, 0.73 for the carer questionnaire, and 0.68 for the staff questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the POS was determined to be a valid and reliable tool to be used for assessing the needs of PC patients in three dimensions in terms of the perspectives of patient, carer, and staff.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7233559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72335592020-05-28 The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study Kocatepe, Vildan Kayıkçı, Emel Emine Saygılı, Ülkü Yıldırım, Dilek Can, Gülbeyaz Örnek, Güngör Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Original Article OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). METHODS: This methodological study consisted of 69 patients hospitalized in the palliative care (PC) service of three hospitals between June 2016 and August 2016, 69 carers who undertook continuously primary care of these patients, and 28 staff members working in the PC service and providing care to these patients. The data of the study were collected using the Personal Diagnosis Form, the POS. The scope, structure and criterion validity and internal consistency reliability of the scale were tested. Item analysis, Cronbach's alpha analysis, content validity ratio, confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity, criterion validity, patient validity, and intraclass correlation coefficient for the adaptation of outcomes of patient, carer, and staff groups were conducted. RESULTS: The content validity ratio of the scale was found to be higher than 0.80 for patient, carer, and staff questionnaires. Item-total score correlation coefficients were determined between 0.27 and 0.72 for the items in the patient questionnaire, 0.33–0.67 for the carer questionnaire, and 0.34–0.72 for the staff questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients were determined as 0.64 for the patient questionnaire, 0.73 for the carer questionnaire, and 0.68 for the staff questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the POS was determined to be a valid and reliable tool to be used for assessing the needs of PC patients in three dimensions in terms of the perspectives of patient, carer, and staff. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7233559/ /pubmed/32478138 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_51_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Ann & Joshua Medical Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kocatepe, Vildan
Kayıkçı, Emel Emine
Saygılı, Ülkü
Yıldırım, Dilek
Can, Gülbeyaz
Örnek, Güngör
The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
title The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
title_full The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
title_fullStr The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
title_full_unstemmed The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
title_short The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
title_sort palliative care outcome scale: turkish validity and reliability study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478138
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_51_19
work_keys_str_mv AT kocatepevildan thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT kayıkcıemelemine thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT saygılıulku thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT yıldırımdilek thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT cangulbeyaz thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT ornekgungor thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT kocatepevildan palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT kayıkcıemelemine palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT saygılıulku palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT yıldırımdilek palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT cangulbeyaz palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy
AT ornekgungor palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy