Cargando…
The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). METHODS: This methodological study consisted of 69 patients hospitalized in the palliative care (PC) service of three hospitals between June 2016 and August 2016, 69 carers who under...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478138 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_51_19 |
_version_ | 1783535561033646080 |
---|---|
author | Kocatepe, Vildan Kayıkçı, Emel Emine Saygılı, Ülkü Yıldırım, Dilek Can, Gülbeyaz Örnek, Güngör |
author_facet | Kocatepe, Vildan Kayıkçı, Emel Emine Saygılı, Ülkü Yıldırım, Dilek Can, Gülbeyaz Örnek, Güngör |
author_sort | Kocatepe, Vildan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). METHODS: This methodological study consisted of 69 patients hospitalized in the palliative care (PC) service of three hospitals between June 2016 and August 2016, 69 carers who undertook continuously primary care of these patients, and 28 staff members working in the PC service and providing care to these patients. The data of the study were collected using the Personal Diagnosis Form, the POS. The scope, structure and criterion validity and internal consistency reliability of the scale were tested. Item analysis, Cronbach's alpha analysis, content validity ratio, confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity, criterion validity, patient validity, and intraclass correlation coefficient for the adaptation of outcomes of patient, carer, and staff groups were conducted. RESULTS: The content validity ratio of the scale was found to be higher than 0.80 for patient, carer, and staff questionnaires. Item-total score correlation coefficients were determined between 0.27 and 0.72 for the items in the patient questionnaire, 0.33–0.67 for the carer questionnaire, and 0.34–0.72 for the staff questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients were determined as 0.64 for the patient questionnaire, 0.73 for the carer questionnaire, and 0.68 for the staff questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the POS was determined to be a valid and reliable tool to be used for assessing the needs of PC patients in three dimensions in terms of the perspectives of patient, carer, and staff. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7233559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72335592020-05-28 The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study Kocatepe, Vildan Kayıkçı, Emel Emine Saygılı, Ülkü Yıldırım, Dilek Can, Gülbeyaz Örnek, Güngör Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Original Article OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). METHODS: This methodological study consisted of 69 patients hospitalized in the palliative care (PC) service of three hospitals between June 2016 and August 2016, 69 carers who undertook continuously primary care of these patients, and 28 staff members working in the PC service and providing care to these patients. The data of the study were collected using the Personal Diagnosis Form, the POS. The scope, structure and criterion validity and internal consistency reliability of the scale were tested. Item analysis, Cronbach's alpha analysis, content validity ratio, confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity, criterion validity, patient validity, and intraclass correlation coefficient for the adaptation of outcomes of patient, carer, and staff groups were conducted. RESULTS: The content validity ratio of the scale was found to be higher than 0.80 for patient, carer, and staff questionnaires. Item-total score correlation coefficients were determined between 0.27 and 0.72 for the items in the patient questionnaire, 0.33–0.67 for the carer questionnaire, and 0.34–0.72 for the staff questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients were determined as 0.64 for the patient questionnaire, 0.73 for the carer questionnaire, and 0.68 for the staff questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the POS was determined to be a valid and reliable tool to be used for assessing the needs of PC patients in three dimensions in terms of the perspectives of patient, carer, and staff. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7233559/ /pubmed/32478138 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_51_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Ann & Joshua Medical Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kocatepe, Vildan Kayıkçı, Emel Emine Saygılı, Ülkü Yıldırım, Dilek Can, Gülbeyaz Örnek, Güngör The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study |
title | The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study |
title_full | The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study |
title_fullStr | The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study |
title_short | The Palliative Care Outcome Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study |
title_sort | palliative care outcome scale: turkish validity and reliability study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478138 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_51_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kocatepevildan thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT kayıkcıemelemine thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT saygılıulku thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT yıldırımdilek thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT cangulbeyaz thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT ornekgungor thepalliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT kocatepevildan palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT kayıkcıemelemine palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT saygılıulku palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT yıldırımdilek palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT cangulbeyaz palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy AT ornekgungor palliativecareoutcomescaleturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudy |