Cargando…
Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study
Background and aim of the work: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming treatment of choice in glenohumeral arthropathies with massive lesion of the rotator cuff, due to a gradual extension of indications and new designs that provide better outcome. In this study we compared two different re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821285 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8983 |
_version_ | 1783535591713931264 |
---|---|
author | Beltrame, Alessandro Di Benedetto, Paolo Cicuto, Chiara Cainero, Vanni Gisonni, Renato Causero, Araldo |
author_facet | Beltrame, Alessandro Di Benedetto, Paolo Cicuto, Chiara Cainero, Vanni Gisonni, Renato Causero, Araldo |
author_sort | Beltrame, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aim of the work: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming treatment of choice in glenohumeral arthropathies with massive lesion of the rotator cuff, due to a gradual extension of indications and new designs that provide better outcome. In this study we compared two different reverse shoulder prosthesis designs, defined as Inlay (or typical Grammont type) and a relatively new model defined as Onlay (that preserves tuberosity bone stock). We analyzed clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes, as well as complications of RSA in these two groups. Methods: We performed a prospective study on a population of 42 patients undergoing Reverse Shoulder Replacement by a single expert surgeon. We consider 21 patients (group A) who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a curved onlay steam with 145° inclination (Ascend Flex group, Wright medical, Memphis, TN, USA) and 21 patients who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a traditional Inlay Grammont steam (Modular Shoulder System SMR, Systema Multiplana Randelli; Lima-LTO, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) between August 2010 and October 2018. We studied the following items: active range of motion (AROM), radiological parameters (lateralization shoulder angle LSA, Distalization Shoulder Angle DSA), functional scale (Constant-Murley Score), post-operative complications (infection, aseptical implant mobilitazion, residual pain, scapular notching, fractures, tuberosity reabsorbtion, dislocation, bleedings, nerve palsy, pulmonary embolus). Results: A significant improvement in ROM and functional score (Constant Shoulder Score) were observed in both groups. Group A (Onlay design 145°, medial tray) provides improvement in adduction, extension and external rotation compared to group B. No significant differences were found in abduction, external rotation and forward flexion. At 6 months follow-up, pain relief was detected in all patients. Although complications occur in a high percentage of patients in literature, no postoperative complications were observed in our cases series. Conclusions: Our results showed how RSA is a real solution to improve quality of life and to restore pain-free shoulder ROM in patients where cuff tear arthropathy occurs. Onlay design 145° may provides better active external rotation, extension, adduction: it is necessary to continue follow up and include more cases to prove these data. (www.actabiomedica.it) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7233693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72336932020-05-19 Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study Beltrame, Alessandro Di Benedetto, Paolo Cicuto, Chiara Cainero, Vanni Gisonni, Renato Causero, Araldo Acta Biomed Original Article Background and aim of the work: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming treatment of choice in glenohumeral arthropathies with massive lesion of the rotator cuff, due to a gradual extension of indications and new designs that provide better outcome. In this study we compared two different reverse shoulder prosthesis designs, defined as Inlay (or typical Grammont type) and a relatively new model defined as Onlay (that preserves tuberosity bone stock). We analyzed clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes, as well as complications of RSA in these two groups. Methods: We performed a prospective study on a population of 42 patients undergoing Reverse Shoulder Replacement by a single expert surgeon. We consider 21 patients (group A) who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a curved onlay steam with 145° inclination (Ascend Flex group, Wright medical, Memphis, TN, USA) and 21 patients who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a traditional Inlay Grammont steam (Modular Shoulder System SMR, Systema Multiplana Randelli; Lima-LTO, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) between August 2010 and October 2018. We studied the following items: active range of motion (AROM), radiological parameters (lateralization shoulder angle LSA, Distalization Shoulder Angle DSA), functional scale (Constant-Murley Score), post-operative complications (infection, aseptical implant mobilitazion, residual pain, scapular notching, fractures, tuberosity reabsorbtion, dislocation, bleedings, nerve palsy, pulmonary embolus). Results: A significant improvement in ROM and functional score (Constant Shoulder Score) were observed in both groups. Group A (Onlay design 145°, medial tray) provides improvement in adduction, extension and external rotation compared to group B. No significant differences were found in abduction, external rotation and forward flexion. At 6 months follow-up, pain relief was detected in all patients. Although complications occur in a high percentage of patients in literature, no postoperative complications were observed in our cases series. Conclusions: Our results showed how RSA is a real solution to improve quality of life and to restore pain-free shoulder ROM in patients where cuff tear arthropathy occurs. Onlay design 145° may provides better active external rotation, extension, adduction: it is necessary to continue follow up and include more cases to prove these data. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2019 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7233693/ /pubmed/31821285 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8983 Text en Copyright: © 2019 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Beltrame, Alessandro Di Benedetto, Paolo Cicuto, Chiara Cainero, Vanni Gisonni, Renato Causero, Araldo Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study |
title | Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study |
title_full | Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study |
title_fullStr | Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study |
title_short | Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study |
title_sort | onlay versus inlay humeral steam in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rsa): clinical and biomechanical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821285 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8983 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beltramealessandro onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy AT dibenedettopaolo onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy AT cicutochiara onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy AT cainerovanni onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy AT gisonnirenato onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy AT causeroaraldo onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy |