Cargando…

Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study

Background and aim of the work: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming treatment of choice in glenohumeral arthropathies with massive lesion of the rotator cuff, due to a gradual extension of indications and new designs that provide better outcome. In this study we compared two different re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beltrame, Alessandro, Di Benedetto, Paolo, Cicuto, Chiara, Cainero, Vanni, Gisonni, Renato, Causero, Araldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821285
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8983
_version_ 1783535591713931264
author Beltrame, Alessandro
Di Benedetto, Paolo
Cicuto, Chiara
Cainero, Vanni
Gisonni, Renato
Causero, Araldo
author_facet Beltrame, Alessandro
Di Benedetto, Paolo
Cicuto, Chiara
Cainero, Vanni
Gisonni, Renato
Causero, Araldo
author_sort Beltrame, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description Background and aim of the work: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming treatment of choice in glenohumeral arthropathies with massive lesion of the rotator cuff, due to a gradual extension of indications and new designs that provide better outcome. In this study we compared two different reverse shoulder prosthesis designs, defined as Inlay (or typical Grammont type) and a relatively new model defined as Onlay (that preserves tuberosity bone stock). We analyzed clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes, as well as complications of RSA in these two groups. Methods: We performed a prospective study on a population of 42 patients undergoing Reverse Shoulder Replacement by a single expert surgeon. We consider 21 patients (group A) who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a curved onlay steam with 145° inclination (Ascend Flex group, Wright medical, Memphis, TN, USA) and 21 patients who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a traditional Inlay Grammont steam (Modular Shoulder System SMR, Systema Multiplana Randelli; Lima-LTO, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) between August 2010 and October 2018. We studied the following items: active range of motion (AROM), radiological parameters (lateralization shoulder angle LSA, Distalization Shoulder Angle DSA), functional scale (Constant-Murley Score), post-operative complications (infection, aseptical implant mobilitazion, residual pain, scapular notching, fractures, tuberosity reabsorbtion, dislocation, bleedings, nerve palsy, pulmonary embolus). Results: A significant improvement in ROM and functional score (Constant Shoulder Score) were observed in both groups. Group A (Onlay design 145°, medial tray) provides improvement in adduction, extension and external rotation compared to group B. No significant differences were found in abduction, external rotation and forward flexion. At 6 months follow-up, pain relief was detected in all patients. Although complications occur in a high percentage of patients in literature, no postoperative complications were observed in our cases series. Conclusions: Our results showed how RSA is a real solution to improve quality of life and to restore pain-free shoulder ROM in patients where cuff tear arthropathy occurs. Onlay design 145° may provides better active external rotation, extension, adduction: it is necessary to continue follow up and include more cases to prove these data. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7233693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72336932020-05-19 Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study Beltrame, Alessandro Di Benedetto, Paolo Cicuto, Chiara Cainero, Vanni Gisonni, Renato Causero, Araldo Acta Biomed Original Article Background and aim of the work: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming treatment of choice in glenohumeral arthropathies with massive lesion of the rotator cuff, due to a gradual extension of indications and new designs that provide better outcome. In this study we compared two different reverse shoulder prosthesis designs, defined as Inlay (or typical Grammont type) and a relatively new model defined as Onlay (that preserves tuberosity bone stock). We analyzed clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes, as well as complications of RSA in these two groups. Methods: We performed a prospective study on a population of 42 patients undergoing Reverse Shoulder Replacement by a single expert surgeon. We consider 21 patients (group A) who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a curved onlay steam with 145° inclination (Ascend Flex group, Wright medical, Memphis, TN, USA) and 21 patients who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a traditional Inlay Grammont steam (Modular Shoulder System SMR, Systema Multiplana Randelli; Lima-LTO, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) between August 2010 and October 2018. We studied the following items: active range of motion (AROM), radiological parameters (lateralization shoulder angle LSA, Distalization Shoulder Angle DSA), functional scale (Constant-Murley Score), post-operative complications (infection, aseptical implant mobilitazion, residual pain, scapular notching, fractures, tuberosity reabsorbtion, dislocation, bleedings, nerve palsy, pulmonary embolus). Results: A significant improvement in ROM and functional score (Constant Shoulder Score) were observed in both groups. Group A (Onlay design 145°, medial tray) provides improvement in adduction, extension and external rotation compared to group B. No significant differences were found in abduction, external rotation and forward flexion. At 6 months follow-up, pain relief was detected in all patients. Although complications occur in a high percentage of patients in literature, no postoperative complications were observed in our cases series. Conclusions: Our results showed how RSA is a real solution to improve quality of life and to restore pain-free shoulder ROM in patients where cuff tear arthropathy occurs. Onlay design 145° may provides better active external rotation, extension, adduction: it is necessary to continue follow up and include more cases to prove these data. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2019 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7233693/ /pubmed/31821285 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8983 Text en Copyright: © 2019 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Beltrame, Alessandro
Di Benedetto, Paolo
Cicuto, Chiara
Cainero, Vanni
Gisonni, Renato
Causero, Araldo
Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study
title Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study
title_full Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study
title_fullStr Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study
title_full_unstemmed Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study
title_short Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study
title_sort onlay versus inlay humeral steam in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rsa): clinical and biomechanical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821285
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8983
work_keys_str_mv AT beltramealessandro onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy
AT dibenedettopaolo onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy
AT cicutochiara onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy
AT cainerovanni onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy
AT gisonnirenato onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy
AT causeroaraldo onlayversusinlayhumeralsteaminreverseshoulderarthroplastyrsaclinicalandbiomechanicalstudy