Cargando…

Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data

The factors that guarantee the survival of the unicompartmental prosthesis implant seems to be linked to the accurate positioning of the components. The aim of our study is to compare the standard operative technique and the assisted navigation technique to understand if the robotic technology is ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Benedetto, Paolo, Buttironi, Michele Mario, Magnanelli, Stefano, Cainero, Vanni, Causero, Araldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821293
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8994
_version_ 1783535592421720064
author Di Benedetto, Paolo
Buttironi, Michele Mario
Magnanelli, Stefano
Cainero, Vanni
Causero, Araldo
author_facet Di Benedetto, Paolo
Buttironi, Michele Mario
Magnanelli, Stefano
Cainero, Vanni
Causero, Araldo
author_sort Di Benedetto, Paolo
collection PubMed
description The factors that guarantee the survival of the unicompartmental prosthesis implant seems to be linked to the accurate positioning of the components. The aim of our study is to compare the standard operative technique and the assisted navigation technique to understand if the robotic technology is able to obtain more accurate implants and with a better outcome. In the period between January 2016 and February 2018, in our Clinic, were performed 94 medial unicompartmental knee implants. The implantation of the medial unicompartmental prosthesis was performed in 30 cases with the standard technique and in 29 cases with the image-free robotic technique (Navio Surgical System). The objective of our study was to evaluate the anatomical and mechanical axes, the tibial slope, the coronal inclination of the femoral tibial space, the coronal angulation of the tibial and femoral component and the height of the Joint-Line. Furthermore, to evaluate the outcome we has execute international scores (IKDC and KSS Insall mod.). The advanced navigation seems to allow the implantation of the unicompartmental prosthesis more precisely, although not always with a statistically significant difference compared to the standard technique. further clinical studies are needed to analyze the medium and long-term survival rate, as well as the patient’s subjective outcome. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7233696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72336962020-05-19 Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data Di Benedetto, Paolo Buttironi, Michele Mario Magnanelli, Stefano Cainero, Vanni Causero, Araldo Acta Biomed Original Article The factors that guarantee the survival of the unicompartmental prosthesis implant seems to be linked to the accurate positioning of the components. The aim of our study is to compare the standard operative technique and the assisted navigation technique to understand if the robotic technology is able to obtain more accurate implants and with a better outcome. In the period between January 2016 and February 2018, in our Clinic, were performed 94 medial unicompartmental knee implants. The implantation of the medial unicompartmental prosthesis was performed in 30 cases with the standard technique and in 29 cases with the image-free robotic technique (Navio Surgical System). The objective of our study was to evaluate the anatomical and mechanical axes, the tibial slope, the coronal inclination of the femoral tibial space, the coronal angulation of the tibial and femoral component and the height of the Joint-Line. Furthermore, to evaluate the outcome we has execute international scores (IKDC and KSS Insall mod.). The advanced navigation seems to allow the implantation of the unicompartmental prosthesis more precisely, although not always with a statistically significant difference compared to the standard technique. further clinical studies are needed to analyze the medium and long-term survival rate, as well as the patient’s subjective outcome. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2019 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7233696/ /pubmed/31821293 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8994 Text en Copyright: © 2019 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Di Benedetto, Paolo
Buttironi, Michele Mario
Magnanelli, Stefano
Cainero, Vanni
Causero, Araldo
Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data
title Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data
title_full Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data
title_fullStr Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data
title_short Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data
title_sort comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. preliminary data
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821293
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8994
work_keys_str_mv AT dibenedettopaolo comparisonbetweenstandardtechniqueandimagefreerobotictechniqueinmedialunicompartmentalkneearthroplastypreliminarydata
AT buttironimichelemario comparisonbetweenstandardtechniqueandimagefreerobotictechniqueinmedialunicompartmentalkneearthroplastypreliminarydata
AT magnanellistefano comparisonbetweenstandardtechniqueandimagefreerobotictechniqueinmedialunicompartmentalkneearthroplastypreliminarydata
AT cainerovanni comparisonbetweenstandardtechniqueandimagefreerobotictechniqueinmedialunicompartmentalkneearthroplastypreliminarydata
AT causeroaraldo comparisonbetweenstandardtechniqueandimagefreerobotictechniqueinmedialunicompartmentalkneearthroplastypreliminarydata