Cargando…
Umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim
The umbilicus is a unique physiologic scar of human life resulting from the healing process of the cut umbilical cord at birth. Its absence leads to an unnatural abdominal appearance, and an abnormally shaped or misplaced umbilicus may draw undue attention to the central abdomen. Loss of the umbilic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910176 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i4.7539 |
_version_ | 1783535610750828544 |
---|---|
author | Gardani, Marco Palli, Dante Simonacci, Francesco Grieco, Michele Pio Bertozzi, Nicolò Raposio, Edoardo |
author_facet | Gardani, Marco Palli, Dante Simonacci, Francesco Grieco, Michele Pio Bertozzi, Nicolò Raposio, Edoardo |
author_sort | Gardani, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | The umbilicus is a unique physiologic scar of human life resulting from the healing process of the cut umbilical cord at birth. Its absence leads to an unnatural abdominal appearance, and an abnormally shaped or misplaced umbilicus may draw undue attention to the central abdomen. Loss of the umbilicus can be an embarrassing deformity; this occurs when older techniques of umbilical hernia or incisional hernia repair are employed and after abdominoplasty, urachal cyst repair, omphalocele repair, gastroschisis repair, some tumor excisions, and mobilization of bipedicled or bilateral TRAM/DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Umbilicoplasty, in which the umbilicus remains anchored to the deep abdominal fascia but is transposed through a newly-formed aperture in the upper abdominal skin flap, is performed in abdominoplasty either for abdominal flap harvest or purely for aesthetics. On the other hand, umbiliconeoplasty describes the de novo creation of an umbilicus that is absent for either congenital or acquired reasons. The optimal umbilical reconstruction should be reliable, reproducible, aesthetically appropriate, and associated with low morbidity. Ideally, it is also single-staged, except in the case of an infected wound, in which case a delayed primary approach may be prudent. (www.actabiomedica.it) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7233773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72337732020-05-19 Umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim Gardani, Marco Palli, Dante Simonacci, Francesco Grieco, Michele Pio Bertozzi, Nicolò Raposio, Edoardo Acta Biomed Update The umbilicus is a unique physiologic scar of human life resulting from the healing process of the cut umbilical cord at birth. Its absence leads to an unnatural abdominal appearance, and an abnormally shaped or misplaced umbilicus may draw undue attention to the central abdomen. Loss of the umbilicus can be an embarrassing deformity; this occurs when older techniques of umbilical hernia or incisional hernia repair are employed and after abdominoplasty, urachal cyst repair, omphalocele repair, gastroschisis repair, some tumor excisions, and mobilization of bipedicled or bilateral TRAM/DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Umbilicoplasty, in which the umbilicus remains anchored to the deep abdominal fascia but is transposed through a newly-formed aperture in the upper abdominal skin flap, is performed in abdominoplasty either for abdominal flap harvest or purely for aesthetics. On the other hand, umbiliconeoplasty describes the de novo creation of an umbilicus that is absent for either congenital or acquired reasons. The optimal umbilical reconstruction should be reliable, reproducible, aesthetically appropriate, and associated with low morbidity. Ideally, it is also single-staged, except in the case of an infected wound, in which case a delayed primary approach may be prudent. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2019 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7233773/ /pubmed/31910176 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i4.7539 Text en Copyright: © 2019 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Update Gardani, Marco Palli, Dante Simonacci, Francesco Grieco, Michele Pio Bertozzi, Nicolò Raposio, Edoardo Umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim |
title | Umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim |
title_full | Umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim |
title_fullStr | Umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim |
title_full_unstemmed | Umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim |
title_short | Umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim |
title_sort | umbilical reconstruction: different techniques, a single aim |
topic | Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910176 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i4.7539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gardanimarco umbilicalreconstructiondifferenttechniquesasingleaim AT pallidante umbilicalreconstructiondifferenttechniquesasingleaim AT simonaccifrancesco umbilicalreconstructiondifferenttechniquesasingleaim AT griecomichelepio umbilicalreconstructiondifferenttechniquesasingleaim AT bertozzinicolo umbilicalreconstructiondifferenttechniquesasingleaim AT raposioedoardo umbilicalreconstructiondifferenttechniquesasingleaim |