Cargando…

T1. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AMONG SERVICE-USERS REFERRED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP: UTILITY OF ASSESSING SYMPTOMS SEVERITY RANGE

BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis and comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) typically present with more severe forms of illness. Subthreshold posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) are also likely to cause significant distress. There is a need to enhance screening processes for distressin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penney, Danielle, El-Baalbaki, Ghassan, Lepage, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234231/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.561
_version_ 1783535717750669312
author Penney, Danielle
El-Baalbaki, Ghassan
Lepage, Martin
author_facet Penney, Danielle
El-Baalbaki, Ghassan
Lepage, Martin
author_sort Penney, Danielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis and comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) typically present with more severe forms of illness. Subthreshold posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) are also likely to cause significant distress. There is a need to enhance screening processes for distressing PTSS to encourage appropriate referral to specialized services. The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a widely used self-report to assess PTSS, though there is concern regarding its validity for use in psychosis. If people scoring in the severe PTSS range on the PCL-5 also present with clinical profiles similar to those typically meeting diagnosis for PTSD, it will justify considering a broader range of PTSS and support the use of the PCL-5 as a brief screener. A severe range will arguably capture a wider array of individuals, including those with subthreshold PTSS who also likely require trauma-focused intervention. METHODS: One hundred and two individuals with psychosis completed the PCL-5 and a battery of clinical scales as part of an intake evaluation following referral for psychological follow-up at a clinic specializing in psychosocial interventions for psychosis. Prevalence and type of DSM-5 criterion A event were explored in conjunction with PTSS severity and referral-type. Pearson correlations identified clinical variables associated with PCL-5 total scores and were subsequently entered into a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with dichotomized PTSS severity categories (low, moderate, severe). Post hoc analyses explored significant interactions. RESULTS: Of the 102 participants, 21.6% reported no prior trauma and 14.7% reported non-valid events. Sixty-five participants were included in the analysis; 6.2% of which were referred for trauma. 81.5% reported criterion A events, 10.8% reported psychosis-related events, and 7.7% did not disclose an event. PCL-5 scores were dichotomized using the 33rd and 66th percentiles, translating into low (≤ 24), moderate (25–47), and severe (≥48) groups. Delusion severity and subjective stress, anxiety, depression, social anxiety, quality of life (QoL), and wellbeing were entered into a one-way MANOVA with PTSS severity groups. Significant main effects surviving Bonferroni correction emerged for all variables except delusion severity (F(2,40) = 3.06, p = .058) and wellbeing (F(2,56) = 1.50, p =.233). Stress (F(2,62) = 7.37, p = .001) was higher in the severe (M = 13.13, SD = 5.18) versus low group (M = 7.05, SD = 4.40, p = .001). Anxiety (F(2,62) = 8.02, p = .001) was also higher in the severe (M = 12.30, SD = 5.07) compared to low group (M = 5.85, SD = 5.06, p = .000), and depression (F(2,62) = 5.37, p = .007) was additionally higher in the severe (M = 12.61, SD = 5.73) compared to low group (M = 7.20, SD = 4.97, p = .005). Finally, social anxiety (F(2,58) = 4.25, p = .026.) was higher in the severe (M = 7.76, SD = 3.58) versus low group (M = 4.68, SD = 3.68, p = .029), while QoL (F(2,58) = 3.47, p = .038) was lower in the severe (M = 49.95, SD = 10.99) compared to low group (M = 58.95, SD = 13.76, p = .037). DISCUSSION: Due to a relatively high number of invalid questionnaires (14.7%), service users should likely complete the PCL-5 in the presence of a health-care practitioner. Findings suggest inadequate referral rates for specialized services when they may indeed benefit the service-user. Severe PTSS was associated with increased symptoms of subjective anxiety, depression, stress, social anxiety, and decreased QoL, regardless of whether diagnostic criteria for PTSD was met. A severe PTSS category likely captures a broader range of individuals requiring specialized intervention and speaks to an important need to both facilitate and increase referral rate for trauma-focused therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7234231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72342312020-05-23 T1. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AMONG SERVICE-USERS REFERRED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP: UTILITY OF ASSESSING SYMPTOMS SEVERITY RANGE Penney, Danielle El-Baalbaki, Ghassan Lepage, Martin Schizophr Bull Poster Session III BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis and comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) typically present with more severe forms of illness. Subthreshold posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) are also likely to cause significant distress. There is a need to enhance screening processes for distressing PTSS to encourage appropriate referral to specialized services. The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a widely used self-report to assess PTSS, though there is concern regarding its validity for use in psychosis. If people scoring in the severe PTSS range on the PCL-5 also present with clinical profiles similar to those typically meeting diagnosis for PTSD, it will justify considering a broader range of PTSS and support the use of the PCL-5 as a brief screener. A severe range will arguably capture a wider array of individuals, including those with subthreshold PTSS who also likely require trauma-focused intervention. METHODS: One hundred and two individuals with psychosis completed the PCL-5 and a battery of clinical scales as part of an intake evaluation following referral for psychological follow-up at a clinic specializing in psychosocial interventions for psychosis. Prevalence and type of DSM-5 criterion A event were explored in conjunction with PTSS severity and referral-type. Pearson correlations identified clinical variables associated with PCL-5 total scores and were subsequently entered into a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with dichotomized PTSS severity categories (low, moderate, severe). Post hoc analyses explored significant interactions. RESULTS: Of the 102 participants, 21.6% reported no prior trauma and 14.7% reported non-valid events. Sixty-five participants were included in the analysis; 6.2% of which were referred for trauma. 81.5% reported criterion A events, 10.8% reported psychosis-related events, and 7.7% did not disclose an event. PCL-5 scores were dichotomized using the 33rd and 66th percentiles, translating into low (≤ 24), moderate (25–47), and severe (≥48) groups. Delusion severity and subjective stress, anxiety, depression, social anxiety, quality of life (QoL), and wellbeing were entered into a one-way MANOVA with PTSS severity groups. Significant main effects surviving Bonferroni correction emerged for all variables except delusion severity (F(2,40) = 3.06, p = .058) and wellbeing (F(2,56) = 1.50, p =.233). Stress (F(2,62) = 7.37, p = .001) was higher in the severe (M = 13.13, SD = 5.18) versus low group (M = 7.05, SD = 4.40, p = .001). Anxiety (F(2,62) = 8.02, p = .001) was also higher in the severe (M = 12.30, SD = 5.07) compared to low group (M = 5.85, SD = 5.06, p = .000), and depression (F(2,62) = 5.37, p = .007) was additionally higher in the severe (M = 12.61, SD = 5.73) compared to low group (M = 7.20, SD = 4.97, p = .005). Finally, social anxiety (F(2,58) = 4.25, p = .026.) was higher in the severe (M = 7.76, SD = 3.58) versus low group (M = 4.68, SD = 3.68, p = .029), while QoL (F(2,58) = 3.47, p = .038) was lower in the severe (M = 49.95, SD = 10.99) compared to low group (M = 58.95, SD = 13.76, p = .037). DISCUSSION: Due to a relatively high number of invalid questionnaires (14.7%), service users should likely complete the PCL-5 in the presence of a health-care practitioner. Findings suggest inadequate referral rates for specialized services when they may indeed benefit the service-user. Severe PTSS was associated with increased symptoms of subjective anxiety, depression, stress, social anxiety, and decreased QoL, regardless of whether diagnostic criteria for PTSD was met. A severe PTSS category likely captures a broader range of individuals requiring specialized intervention and speaks to an important need to both facilitate and increase referral rate for trauma-focused therapy. Oxford University Press 2020-05 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7234231/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.561 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Session III
Penney, Danielle
El-Baalbaki, Ghassan
Lepage, Martin
T1. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AMONG SERVICE-USERS REFERRED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP: UTILITY OF ASSESSING SYMPTOMS SEVERITY RANGE
title T1. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AMONG SERVICE-USERS REFERRED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP: UTILITY OF ASSESSING SYMPTOMS SEVERITY RANGE
title_full T1. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AMONG SERVICE-USERS REFERRED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP: UTILITY OF ASSESSING SYMPTOMS SEVERITY RANGE
title_fullStr T1. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AMONG SERVICE-USERS REFERRED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP: UTILITY OF ASSESSING SYMPTOMS SEVERITY RANGE
title_full_unstemmed T1. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AMONG SERVICE-USERS REFERRED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP: UTILITY OF ASSESSING SYMPTOMS SEVERITY RANGE
title_short T1. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AMONG SERVICE-USERS REFERRED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP: UTILITY OF ASSESSING SYMPTOMS SEVERITY RANGE
title_sort t1. clinical profile and prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptoms among service-users referred for psychological follow-up: utility of assessing symptoms severity range
topic Poster Session III
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234231/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.561
work_keys_str_mv AT penneydanielle t1clinicalprofileandprevalenceofposttraumaticstresssymptomsamongserviceusersreferredforpsychologicalfollowuputilityofassessingsymptomsseverityrange
AT elbaalbakighassan t1clinicalprofileandprevalenceofposttraumaticstresssymptomsamongserviceusersreferredforpsychologicalfollowuputilityofassessingsymptomsseverityrange
AT lepagemartin t1clinicalprofileandprevalenceofposttraumaticstresssymptomsamongserviceusersreferredforpsychologicalfollowuputilityofassessingsymptomsseverityrange