Cargando…

S199. HOW TO COLLECT FREE SPEECH TO SPEECH GRAPH ANALYSIS: STANDARDIZED TIME-LIMITED PROTOCOL

BACKGROUND: SpeechGraphs is a computational tool successfully applied to the differential diagnosis of psychosis based on the non-semantic structural analysis of speech graphs. This approach provides quantitative, fast, and low-cost measurements of clinical interest based on free speech, but its rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simabucuru, Gabriela, Copelli, Mauro, Ribeiro, Sidarta, Mota, Natália
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234507/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa031.265
_version_ 1783535779215048704
author Simabucuru, Gabriela
Copelli, Mauro
Ribeiro, Sidarta
Mota, Natália
author_facet Simabucuru, Gabriela
Copelli, Mauro
Ribeiro, Sidarta
Mota, Natália
author_sort Simabucuru, Gabriela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: SpeechGraphs is a computational tool successfully applied to the differential diagnosis of psychosis based on the non-semantic structural analysis of speech graphs. This approach provides quantitative, fast, and low-cost measurements of clinical interest based on free speech, but its replicability needs to understand how different ways to collect speech data can impact such measurements. Stimuli or interruption on a patient’s speech can have a direct impact, especially on SpeechGraphs analysis. We developed a standard for data collection, controlling the time in order to keep the subject talking for a minimum of 30 seconds, and only stimuli the patient’s speech with general instructions. We aim to investigate specifically the impact of considering interviewers interferences marked as paragraphs in transcriptions, and the impact of a time-limited standardized protocol to avoid this bias. METHODS: Two different speech samples from a previous study were compared: 1) using free speech (N = 60, Mota 2014) or 2) using the proposed time-limited protocol (sub-sample of N = 31, Mota 2017). For both samples, we calculated connectedness attributes (such as LSC) in two in two different transcribing conditions: with and without paragraphs. The paragraphs represented the interviewer’s stimuli, and when paragraphs were deleted, we connected the subject’s speech in a unique line. RESULTS: Interviewer’s interferences marked by line-breaks or paragraphs had an impact on connectedness results for the freely speaking protocol (LSC Schizophrenia x Non-Schizophrenia: p = 0.0051 and without paragraph, LSC Schizophrenia x Non-Schizophrenia: p = 0.7764). The standardized protocol with a time limit was sufficient to avoid this bias: we found that there are no differences in considering or not paragraphs, with reports of 30 seconds (LSC Schizophrenia x Non-Schizophrenia: p = 0.0017 and without paragraph, LSC Schizophrenia x Non-Schizophrenia: p=0.0003) DISCUSSION: The standardized data collection protocol seems to be robust in comparison to not controlled methods to collect free speech, allowing the automatization of data gathering and transcriptions, preventing methodological errors in future SpeechGraphs applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7234507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72345072020-05-23 S199. HOW TO COLLECT FREE SPEECH TO SPEECH GRAPH ANALYSIS: STANDARDIZED TIME-LIMITED PROTOCOL Simabucuru, Gabriela Copelli, Mauro Ribeiro, Sidarta Mota, Natália Schizophr Bull Poster Session I BACKGROUND: SpeechGraphs is a computational tool successfully applied to the differential diagnosis of psychosis based on the non-semantic structural analysis of speech graphs. This approach provides quantitative, fast, and low-cost measurements of clinical interest based on free speech, but its replicability needs to understand how different ways to collect speech data can impact such measurements. Stimuli or interruption on a patient’s speech can have a direct impact, especially on SpeechGraphs analysis. We developed a standard for data collection, controlling the time in order to keep the subject talking for a minimum of 30 seconds, and only stimuli the patient’s speech with general instructions. We aim to investigate specifically the impact of considering interviewers interferences marked as paragraphs in transcriptions, and the impact of a time-limited standardized protocol to avoid this bias. METHODS: Two different speech samples from a previous study were compared: 1) using free speech (N = 60, Mota 2014) or 2) using the proposed time-limited protocol (sub-sample of N = 31, Mota 2017). For both samples, we calculated connectedness attributes (such as LSC) in two in two different transcribing conditions: with and without paragraphs. The paragraphs represented the interviewer’s stimuli, and when paragraphs were deleted, we connected the subject’s speech in a unique line. RESULTS: Interviewer’s interferences marked by line-breaks or paragraphs had an impact on connectedness results for the freely speaking protocol (LSC Schizophrenia x Non-Schizophrenia: p = 0.0051 and without paragraph, LSC Schizophrenia x Non-Schizophrenia: p = 0.7764). The standardized protocol with a time limit was sufficient to avoid this bias: we found that there are no differences in considering or not paragraphs, with reports of 30 seconds (LSC Schizophrenia x Non-Schizophrenia: p = 0.0017 and without paragraph, LSC Schizophrenia x Non-Schizophrenia: p=0.0003) DISCUSSION: The standardized data collection protocol seems to be robust in comparison to not controlled methods to collect free speech, allowing the automatization of data gathering and transcriptions, preventing methodological errors in future SpeechGraphs applications. Oxford University Press 2020-05 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7234507/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa031.265 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Session I
Simabucuru, Gabriela
Copelli, Mauro
Ribeiro, Sidarta
Mota, Natália
S199. HOW TO COLLECT FREE SPEECH TO SPEECH GRAPH ANALYSIS: STANDARDIZED TIME-LIMITED PROTOCOL
title S199. HOW TO COLLECT FREE SPEECH TO SPEECH GRAPH ANALYSIS: STANDARDIZED TIME-LIMITED PROTOCOL
title_full S199. HOW TO COLLECT FREE SPEECH TO SPEECH GRAPH ANALYSIS: STANDARDIZED TIME-LIMITED PROTOCOL
title_fullStr S199. HOW TO COLLECT FREE SPEECH TO SPEECH GRAPH ANALYSIS: STANDARDIZED TIME-LIMITED PROTOCOL
title_full_unstemmed S199. HOW TO COLLECT FREE SPEECH TO SPEECH GRAPH ANALYSIS: STANDARDIZED TIME-LIMITED PROTOCOL
title_short S199. HOW TO COLLECT FREE SPEECH TO SPEECH GRAPH ANALYSIS: STANDARDIZED TIME-LIMITED PROTOCOL
title_sort s199. how to collect free speech to speech graph analysis: standardized time-limited protocol
topic Poster Session I
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234507/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa031.265
work_keys_str_mv AT simabucurugabriela s199howtocollectfreespeechtospeechgraphanalysisstandardizedtimelimitedprotocol
AT copellimauro s199howtocollectfreespeechtospeechgraphanalysisstandardizedtimelimitedprotocol
AT ribeirosidarta s199howtocollectfreespeechtospeechgraphanalysisstandardizedtimelimitedprotocol
AT motanatalia s199howtocollectfreespeechtospeechgraphanalysisstandardizedtimelimitedprotocol