Cargando…

T142. SELF-OTHER DISTINCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: ABNORMALITIES IN THE PREDICTION OF THE SENSORY CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S OWN ACTIONS

BACKGROUND: Core symptoms of schizophrenia include disturbances in the distinction between the self and the external world. It has been suggested that self-other distinction is governed by predictive processing: Copies of an action’s motor command are used to generate forward models that predict upc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uhlmann, Lukas, Pazen, Mareike, van Kemenade, Bianca M, Kircher, Tilo, Straube, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234578/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.702
_version_ 1783535796248117248
author Uhlmann, Lukas
Pazen, Mareike
van Kemenade, Bianca M
Kircher, Tilo
Straube, Benjamin
author_facet Uhlmann, Lukas
Pazen, Mareike
van Kemenade, Bianca M
Kircher, Tilo
Straube, Benjamin
author_sort Uhlmann, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Core symptoms of schizophrenia include disturbances in the distinction between the self and the external world. It has been suggested that self-other distinction is governed by predictive processing: Copies of an action’s motor command are used to generate forward models that predict upcoming sensory input. These predictions are compared with actual sensory input, thereby enabling the brain to discard the processing of sensory input arising from one’s own actions. This is reflected in a decreased perception of and reduced BOLD signal for actively versus passively generated sensory input (suppression effect). Here, we investigated whether BOLD suppression effects for the processing of action feedback involving active and passive hand movements differ between patients with schizophrenia and healthy control participants. Since the identity of one’s body also contributes to self-other distinction, we additionally investigated if differences in BOLD suppression effects between patients and healthy controls are further modulated by whether participants see their own or someone else’s hand moving in accordance with their action. METHODS: 17 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 13 healthy controls (matched for age, sex, and educational degree) performed active and passive hand movements while lying in the MRI scanner. During movement execution (active and passive), participants saw either a real-time video of their current movement (“self”) or someone else’s hand moving in accordance with their action (“other”). This manipulation allowed disentangling the effects of movement characteristics (e.g., who is triggering the movement) from visual identity characteristics (whose hand is moving), which both contribute to self-other distinction. Variable delays were inserted between the movement and the images (“self” and “other”), which had to be detected by the participants. RESULTS: Preliminary results of behavioral performance showed an interaction between group (patients vs. healthy controls) and action execution (active vs. passive): Healthy controls detected less delays in the active condition than in the passive condition, whereas this difference was reduced in patients. In line with this, active vs. passive trials revealed larger BOLD suppression effects in healthy controls than in patients with schizophrenia in multiple brain areas (e.g., lingual gyrus, middle and superior occipital gyrus, posterior parietal cortex, cerebellum). Finally, an interaction effect was found in the thalamus, such that in healthy controls, but not in patients with schizophrenia, this area showed a BOLD suppression effect for active vs. passive movements specific for feedback of one’s own hand. DISCUSSION: Weaker behavioral and neural suppression effects in patients with schizophrenia (compared to healthy controls) show that actively generated sensory input is not as effectively discarded from further processing, suggesting that efference copy-based predictive mechanisms are impaired in patients with schizophrenia. Furthermore, BOLD suppression in the thalamus was not modulated by hand identity in patients with schizophrenia, indicating that predictive processing in schizophrenia might not take the identity of the seen body part into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7234578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72345782020-05-23 T142. SELF-OTHER DISTINCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: ABNORMALITIES IN THE PREDICTION OF THE SENSORY CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S OWN ACTIONS Uhlmann, Lukas Pazen, Mareike van Kemenade, Bianca M Kircher, Tilo Straube, Benjamin Schizophr Bull Poster Session III BACKGROUND: Core symptoms of schizophrenia include disturbances in the distinction between the self and the external world. It has been suggested that self-other distinction is governed by predictive processing: Copies of an action’s motor command are used to generate forward models that predict upcoming sensory input. These predictions are compared with actual sensory input, thereby enabling the brain to discard the processing of sensory input arising from one’s own actions. This is reflected in a decreased perception of and reduced BOLD signal for actively versus passively generated sensory input (suppression effect). Here, we investigated whether BOLD suppression effects for the processing of action feedback involving active and passive hand movements differ between patients with schizophrenia and healthy control participants. Since the identity of one’s body also contributes to self-other distinction, we additionally investigated if differences in BOLD suppression effects between patients and healthy controls are further modulated by whether participants see their own or someone else’s hand moving in accordance with their action. METHODS: 17 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 13 healthy controls (matched for age, sex, and educational degree) performed active and passive hand movements while lying in the MRI scanner. During movement execution (active and passive), participants saw either a real-time video of their current movement (“self”) or someone else’s hand moving in accordance with their action (“other”). This manipulation allowed disentangling the effects of movement characteristics (e.g., who is triggering the movement) from visual identity characteristics (whose hand is moving), which both contribute to self-other distinction. Variable delays were inserted between the movement and the images (“self” and “other”), which had to be detected by the participants. RESULTS: Preliminary results of behavioral performance showed an interaction between group (patients vs. healthy controls) and action execution (active vs. passive): Healthy controls detected less delays in the active condition than in the passive condition, whereas this difference was reduced in patients. In line with this, active vs. passive trials revealed larger BOLD suppression effects in healthy controls than in patients with schizophrenia in multiple brain areas (e.g., lingual gyrus, middle and superior occipital gyrus, posterior parietal cortex, cerebellum). Finally, an interaction effect was found in the thalamus, such that in healthy controls, but not in patients with schizophrenia, this area showed a BOLD suppression effect for active vs. passive movements specific for feedback of one’s own hand. DISCUSSION: Weaker behavioral and neural suppression effects in patients with schizophrenia (compared to healthy controls) show that actively generated sensory input is not as effectively discarded from further processing, suggesting that efference copy-based predictive mechanisms are impaired in patients with schizophrenia. Furthermore, BOLD suppression in the thalamus was not modulated by hand identity in patients with schizophrenia, indicating that predictive processing in schizophrenia might not take the identity of the seen body part into account. Oxford University Press 2020-05 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7234578/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.702 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Session III
Uhlmann, Lukas
Pazen, Mareike
van Kemenade, Bianca M
Kircher, Tilo
Straube, Benjamin
T142. SELF-OTHER DISTINCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: ABNORMALITIES IN THE PREDICTION OF THE SENSORY CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S OWN ACTIONS
title T142. SELF-OTHER DISTINCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: ABNORMALITIES IN THE PREDICTION OF THE SENSORY CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S OWN ACTIONS
title_full T142. SELF-OTHER DISTINCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: ABNORMALITIES IN THE PREDICTION OF THE SENSORY CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S OWN ACTIONS
title_fullStr T142. SELF-OTHER DISTINCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: ABNORMALITIES IN THE PREDICTION OF THE SENSORY CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S OWN ACTIONS
title_full_unstemmed T142. SELF-OTHER DISTINCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: ABNORMALITIES IN THE PREDICTION OF THE SENSORY CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S OWN ACTIONS
title_short T142. SELF-OTHER DISTINCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: ABNORMALITIES IN THE PREDICTION OF THE SENSORY CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S OWN ACTIONS
title_sort t142. self-other distinction in schizophrenia: abnormalities in the prediction of the sensory consequences of one’s own actions
topic Poster Session III
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234578/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.702
work_keys_str_mv AT uhlmannlukas t142selfotherdistinctioninschizophreniaabnormalitiesinthepredictionofthesensoryconsequencesofonesownactions
AT pazenmareike t142selfotherdistinctioninschizophreniaabnormalitiesinthepredictionofthesensoryconsequencesofonesownactions
AT vankemenadebiancam t142selfotherdistinctioninschizophreniaabnormalitiesinthepredictionofthesensoryconsequencesofonesownactions
AT kirchertilo t142selfotherdistinctioninschizophreniaabnormalitiesinthepredictionofthesensoryconsequencesofonesownactions
AT straubebenjamin t142selfotherdistinctioninschizophreniaabnormalitiesinthepredictionofthesensoryconsequencesofonesownactions