Cargando…

T119. NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS FOR EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS ANTIPSYCHOTIC NAïVE PATIENTS

BACKGROUND: Negative symptoms are associated with a range of poor clinical and real-life functioning outcomes in people with schizophrenia. The division of negative symptoms into two separate factors, named “expressive deficits” and “social amotivation” could enable more accurate analysis and the de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haguiara, Bernardo, Koga Tonsig, Gabriela, Kagan, Simão, Cavalcante, Daniel, Noto, Cristiano, Bressan, Rodrigo, Gadelha, Ary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234629/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.679
_version_ 1783535808499679232
author Haguiara, Bernardo
Koga Tonsig, Gabriela
Kagan, Simão
Cavalcante, Daniel
Noto, Cristiano
Bressan, Rodrigo
Gadelha, Ary
author_facet Haguiara, Bernardo
Koga Tonsig, Gabriela
Kagan, Simão
Cavalcante, Daniel
Noto, Cristiano
Bressan, Rodrigo
Gadelha, Ary
author_sort Haguiara, Bernardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Negative symptoms are associated with a range of poor clinical and real-life functioning outcomes in people with schizophrenia. The division of negative symptoms into two separate factors, named “expressive deficits” and “social amotivation” could enable more accurate analysis and the development of new therapeutic tools. We aim to investigate whether the different symptoms that make up the negative dimension at baseline differently predict treatment response in first episode psychosis (FEP) antipsychotic naïve patients. METHODS: Patients with FEP (n=80), without previous use of antipsychotics, were recruited at an emergency service in São Paulo, Brazil, between 2014 and 2019. Individuals were assessed at admission and after 10 weeks of follow-up. Patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and schizophreniform disorder were included. The diagnosis was confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID-I). Patients were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at the baseline and after 10 weeks of treatment. The “expressive deficits” factor was defined as the sum of the six following items of the PANSS: N1 (blunted affect), N3 (poor rapport), N6 (lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation), G5 (mannerisms and posturing), G7 (motor retardation), G13 (disturbance of volition). The “social amotivation” factor was defined as the sum of N2 (emotional withdrawal), N4 (passive/apathetic social withdrawal) and G16 (active social avoidance). To evaluate treatment response, we used the difference between the PANSS score at baseline and after ten weeks of follow-up (delta-PANSS). We performed three linear regressions, one using the “expressive deficits” factor, one using the “social amotivation” factor and another using the total negative symptom score at baseline. RESULTS: The mean age was 26.01 years old (SD ± 7.2), and the majority was male (58.75%). “Expressive deficits” (p=0.005, R-squared=0.084, F-test=8.28, β=8.24, df=78), “social amotivation” (p=0.009, R-squared=0,072, F-test=7.14, β=5.59, df=78); and negative symptoms (p=0.002, R-squared=0.105, F-test=10.23, β=9.08, df=78) at baseline behaved similarly in relation to delta-PANSS. All measures of negative symptoms are highly correlated to PANSS total at both time points. DISCUSSION: The results were different from our initial hypothesis of worse outcome for patients with higher expressive negative symptoms. We found that negative symptoms overall and both subdomains are highly correlated to PANSS total in acute phase in early stages, what can explain the association to better outcomes with antipsychotic treatment. Longer follow-up can help us to investigate whether differences between the subdomains of negative symptoms can be observed in more stable patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7234629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72346292020-05-23 T119. NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS FOR EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS ANTIPSYCHOTIC NAïVE PATIENTS Haguiara, Bernardo Koga Tonsig, Gabriela Kagan, Simão Cavalcante, Daniel Noto, Cristiano Bressan, Rodrigo Gadelha, Ary Schizophr Bull Poster Session III BACKGROUND: Negative symptoms are associated with a range of poor clinical and real-life functioning outcomes in people with schizophrenia. The division of negative symptoms into two separate factors, named “expressive deficits” and “social amotivation” could enable more accurate analysis and the development of new therapeutic tools. We aim to investigate whether the different symptoms that make up the negative dimension at baseline differently predict treatment response in first episode psychosis (FEP) antipsychotic naïve patients. METHODS: Patients with FEP (n=80), without previous use of antipsychotics, were recruited at an emergency service in São Paulo, Brazil, between 2014 and 2019. Individuals were assessed at admission and after 10 weeks of follow-up. Patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and schizophreniform disorder were included. The diagnosis was confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID-I). Patients were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at the baseline and after 10 weeks of treatment. The “expressive deficits” factor was defined as the sum of the six following items of the PANSS: N1 (blunted affect), N3 (poor rapport), N6 (lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation), G5 (mannerisms and posturing), G7 (motor retardation), G13 (disturbance of volition). The “social amotivation” factor was defined as the sum of N2 (emotional withdrawal), N4 (passive/apathetic social withdrawal) and G16 (active social avoidance). To evaluate treatment response, we used the difference between the PANSS score at baseline and after ten weeks of follow-up (delta-PANSS). We performed three linear regressions, one using the “expressive deficits” factor, one using the “social amotivation” factor and another using the total negative symptom score at baseline. RESULTS: The mean age was 26.01 years old (SD ± 7.2), and the majority was male (58.75%). “Expressive deficits” (p=0.005, R-squared=0.084, F-test=8.28, β=8.24, df=78), “social amotivation” (p=0.009, R-squared=0,072, F-test=7.14, β=5.59, df=78); and negative symptoms (p=0.002, R-squared=0.105, F-test=10.23, β=9.08, df=78) at baseline behaved similarly in relation to delta-PANSS. All measures of negative symptoms are highly correlated to PANSS total at both time points. DISCUSSION: The results were different from our initial hypothesis of worse outcome for patients with higher expressive negative symptoms. We found that negative symptoms overall and both subdomains are highly correlated to PANSS total in acute phase in early stages, what can explain the association to better outcomes with antipsychotic treatment. Longer follow-up can help us to investigate whether differences between the subdomains of negative symptoms can be observed in more stable patients. Oxford University Press 2020-05 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7234629/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.679 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Session III
Haguiara, Bernardo
Koga Tonsig, Gabriela
Kagan, Simão
Cavalcante, Daniel
Noto, Cristiano
Bressan, Rodrigo
Gadelha, Ary
T119. NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS FOR EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS ANTIPSYCHOTIC NAïVE PATIENTS
title T119. NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS FOR EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS ANTIPSYCHOTIC NAïVE PATIENTS
title_full T119. NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS FOR EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS ANTIPSYCHOTIC NAïVE PATIENTS
title_fullStr T119. NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS FOR EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS ANTIPSYCHOTIC NAïVE PATIENTS
title_full_unstemmed T119. NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS FOR EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS ANTIPSYCHOTIC NAïVE PATIENTS
title_short T119. NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOLITIVE AND EXPRESSIVE NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS FOR EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE IN FIRST EPISODE OF PSYCHOSIS ANTIPSYCHOTIC NAïVE PATIENTS
title_sort t119. no difference between volitive and expressive negative symptoms for early treatment response in first episode of psychosis antipsychotic naïve patients
topic Poster Session III
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234629/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.679
work_keys_str_mv AT haguiarabernardo t119nodifferencebetweenvolitiveandexpressivenegativesymptomsforearlytreatmentresponseinfirstepisodeofpsychosisantipsychoticnaivepatients
AT kogatonsiggabriela t119nodifferencebetweenvolitiveandexpressivenegativesymptomsforearlytreatmentresponseinfirstepisodeofpsychosisantipsychoticnaivepatients
AT kagansimao t119nodifferencebetweenvolitiveandexpressivenegativesymptomsforearlytreatmentresponseinfirstepisodeofpsychosisantipsychoticnaivepatients
AT cavalcantedaniel t119nodifferencebetweenvolitiveandexpressivenegativesymptomsforearlytreatmentresponseinfirstepisodeofpsychosisantipsychoticnaivepatients
AT notocristiano t119nodifferencebetweenvolitiveandexpressivenegativesymptomsforearlytreatmentresponseinfirstepisodeofpsychosisantipsychoticnaivepatients
AT bressanrodrigo t119nodifferencebetweenvolitiveandexpressivenegativesymptomsforearlytreatmentresponseinfirstepisodeofpsychosisantipsychoticnaivepatients
AT gadelhaary t119nodifferencebetweenvolitiveandexpressivenegativesymptomsforearlytreatmentresponseinfirstepisodeofpsychosisantipsychoticnaivepatients