Cargando…

Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls

INTRODUCTION: Although emergency medical services (EMS) standing-order protocols provide more efficient and accurate on-scene management by paramedics, online medical direction (OLMD) has not been eliminated from practice. In this modern era of OLMD, no studies exist to describe the prevalence of re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rai, Balaj, Tennyson, Joseph, Marshall, R. Trevor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32421517
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.1.44943
_version_ 1783535828685815808
author Rai, Balaj
Tennyson, Joseph
Marshall, R. Trevor
author_facet Rai, Balaj
Tennyson, Joseph
Marshall, R. Trevor
author_sort Rai, Balaj
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although emergency medical services (EMS) standing-order protocols provide more efficient and accurate on-scene management by paramedics, online medical direction (OLMD) has not been eliminated from practice. In this modern era of OLMD, no studies exist to describe the prevalence of reasons for contacting OLMD. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this study was to describe the quantity of and reasons for calls for medical direction. We also sought to determine time diverted from emergency physicians due to OLMD. Finally, we hoped to identify any areas for potential improvement or additional training opportunities for EMS providers. METHODS: This was a descriptive study with retrospective data analysis of recorded OLMD calls from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. Data were extracted by research personnel listening to audio recordings and were entered into a database for descriptive analysis. We abstracted the date and length of call, patient demographic information (age and gender), category of call (trauma, medical, cardiac, or obstetrics), reason for call, and origin of call (prehospital, interhospital, nursing home, or discharge). RESULTS: The total number of recordings analyzed was 519. Calls were divided into four categories pertaining to their nature: 353 (68.5%) medical; 70 (13.6%) trauma; 83 (16.1%) cardiac; and 9 (8%) were obstetrics related. Repeat calls regarding the same patient encounter comprised 48 (9.4%) of the calls. Patient refusal of transport was the most common reason for a call medical direction (32.3% of calls). The total time for medical direction calls for the year was 26.6 hours. The maximum number of calls in a single day was seven, with a mean of 2.04 calls per day (standard deviation [SD] ± 1.18). The mean call length was 3.06 minutes (SD ± 2.51). CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that the use of OLMD frequently involves complex decision-making such as determination of the medical decision-making capacity of patients to refuse treatment and transport, and evaluation of the appropriate level of care for interfacility transfers. Further investigation into the effect of EMS physician-driven medical direction on both the quality and time required for OLMD could allow for better identification of areas of potential improvement and training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7234714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72347142020-05-21 Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls Rai, Balaj Tennyson, Joseph Marshall, R. Trevor West J Emerg Med Emergency Medical Services INTRODUCTION: Although emergency medical services (EMS) standing-order protocols provide more efficient and accurate on-scene management by paramedics, online medical direction (OLMD) has not been eliminated from practice. In this modern era of OLMD, no studies exist to describe the prevalence of reasons for contacting OLMD. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this study was to describe the quantity of and reasons for calls for medical direction. We also sought to determine time diverted from emergency physicians due to OLMD. Finally, we hoped to identify any areas for potential improvement or additional training opportunities for EMS providers. METHODS: This was a descriptive study with retrospective data analysis of recorded OLMD calls from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. Data were extracted by research personnel listening to audio recordings and were entered into a database for descriptive analysis. We abstracted the date and length of call, patient demographic information (age and gender), category of call (trauma, medical, cardiac, or obstetrics), reason for call, and origin of call (prehospital, interhospital, nursing home, or discharge). RESULTS: The total number of recordings analyzed was 519. Calls were divided into four categories pertaining to their nature: 353 (68.5%) medical; 70 (13.6%) trauma; 83 (16.1%) cardiac; and 9 (8%) were obstetrics related. Repeat calls regarding the same patient encounter comprised 48 (9.4%) of the calls. Patient refusal of transport was the most common reason for a call medical direction (32.3% of calls). The total time for medical direction calls for the year was 26.6 hours. The maximum number of calls in a single day was seven, with a mean of 2.04 calls per day (standard deviation [SD] ± 1.18). The mean call length was 3.06 minutes (SD ± 2.51). CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that the use of OLMD frequently involves complex decision-making such as determination of the medical decision-making capacity of patients to refuse treatment and transport, and evaluation of the appropriate level of care for interfacility transfers. Further investigation into the effect of EMS physician-driven medical direction on both the quality and time required for OLMD could allow for better identification of areas of potential improvement and training. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020-05 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7234714/ /pubmed/32421517 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.1.44943 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Rai et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medical Services
Rai, Balaj
Tennyson, Joseph
Marshall, R. Trevor
Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls
title Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls
title_full Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls
title_fullStr Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls
title_short Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls
title_sort retrospective analysis of emergency medical services (ems) physician medical control calls
topic Emergency Medical Services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32421517
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.1.44943
work_keys_str_mv AT raibalaj retrospectiveanalysisofemergencymedicalservicesemsphysicianmedicalcontrolcalls
AT tennysonjoseph retrospectiveanalysisofemergencymedicalservicesemsphysicianmedicalcontrolcalls
AT marshallrtrevor retrospectiveanalysisofemergencymedicalservicesemsphysicianmedicalcontrolcalls