Cargando…
Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research
This narrative review aimed to elucidate which robot-related characteristics predict relationship formation between typically-developing children and social robots in terms of closeness and trust. Moreover, we wanted to know to what extent relationship formation can be explained by children’s experi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32454901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00569-0 |
_version_ | 1783535895153999872 |
---|---|
author | van Straten, Caroline L. Peter, Jochen Kühne, Rinaldo |
author_facet | van Straten, Caroline L. Peter, Jochen Kühne, Rinaldo |
author_sort | van Straten, Caroline L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This narrative review aimed to elucidate which robot-related characteristics predict relationship formation between typically-developing children and social robots in terms of closeness and trust. Moreover, we wanted to know to what extent relationship formation can be explained by children’s experiential and cognitive states during interaction with a robot. We reviewed 86 journal articles and conference proceedings published between 2000 and 2017. In terms of predictors, robots’ responsiveness and role, as well as strategic and emotional interaction between robot and child, increased closeness between the child and the robot. Findings about whether robot features predict children’s trust in robots were inconsistent. In terms of children’s experiential and cognitive states during interaction with a robot, robot characteristics and interaction styles were associated with two experiential states: engagement and enjoyment/liking. The literature hardly addressed the impact of experiential and cognitive states on closeness and trust. Comparisons of children’s interactions with robots, adults, and objects showed that robots are perceived as neither animate nor inanimate, and that they are entities with whom children will likely form social relationships. Younger children experienced more enjoyment, were less sensitive to a robot’s interaction style, and were more prone to anthropomorphic tendencies and effects than older children. Tailoring a robot’s sex to that of a child mainly appealed to boys. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12369-019-00569-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7235061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72350612020-05-20 Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research van Straten, Caroline L. Peter, Jochen Kühne, Rinaldo Int J Soc Robot Article This narrative review aimed to elucidate which robot-related characteristics predict relationship formation between typically-developing children and social robots in terms of closeness and trust. Moreover, we wanted to know to what extent relationship formation can be explained by children’s experiential and cognitive states during interaction with a robot. We reviewed 86 journal articles and conference proceedings published between 2000 and 2017. In terms of predictors, robots’ responsiveness and role, as well as strategic and emotional interaction between robot and child, increased closeness between the child and the robot. Findings about whether robot features predict children’s trust in robots were inconsistent. In terms of children’s experiential and cognitive states during interaction with a robot, robot characteristics and interaction styles were associated with two experiential states: engagement and enjoyment/liking. The literature hardly addressed the impact of experiential and cognitive states on closeness and trust. Comparisons of children’s interactions with robots, adults, and objects showed that robots are perceived as neither animate nor inanimate, and that they are entities with whom children will likely form social relationships. Younger children experienced more enjoyment, were less sensitive to a robot’s interaction style, and were more prone to anthropomorphic tendencies and effects than older children. Tailoring a robot’s sex to that of a child mainly appealed to boys. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12369-019-00569-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2019-07-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7235061/ /pubmed/32454901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00569-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article van Straten, Caroline L. Peter, Jochen Kühne, Rinaldo Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research |
title | Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research |
title_full | Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research |
title_fullStr | Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research |
title_short | Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research |
title_sort | child–robot relationship formation: a narrative review of empirical research |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32454901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00569-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanstratencarolinel childrobotrelationshipformationanarrativereviewofempiricalresearch AT peterjochen childrobotrelationshipformationanarrativereviewofempiricalresearch AT kuhnerinaldo childrobotrelationshipformationanarrativereviewofempiricalresearch |