Cargando…

The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report

Introduction: Despite increasing awareness of the negative impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation, its precise influence in different subgroups of liver transplant recipients has not been analyzed in detail. This study aimed to identify liver transplant recipients with an unfavo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lozanovski, Vladimir J., Döhler, Bernd, Weiss, Karl Heinz, Mehrabi, Arianeb, Süsal, Caner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477362
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00892
_version_ 1783535964841312256
author Lozanovski, Vladimir J.
Döhler, Bernd
Weiss, Karl Heinz
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Süsal, Caner
author_facet Lozanovski, Vladimir J.
Döhler, Bernd
Weiss, Karl Heinz
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Süsal, Caner
author_sort Lozanovski, Vladimir J.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Despite increasing awareness of the negative impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation, its precise influence in different subgroups of liver transplant recipients has not been analyzed in detail. This study aimed to identify liver transplant recipients with an unfavorable outcome due to prolonged cold ischemia. Methods: 40,288 adult liver transplantations, performed between 1998 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. Results: Prolonged CIT significantly reduced graft and patient survival only during the first post-transplant year. On average, each hour added to the cold ischemia was associated with a 3.4% increase in the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 1.034, P < 0.001). The impact of CIT was strongest in patients with hepatitis C-related (HCV) cirrhosis with a 24% higher risk of graft loss already at 8–9 h (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05–1.47, P = 0.011) and 64% higher risk at ≥14 h (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.30–2.09, P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and alcoholic cirrhosis tolerated longer ischemia times up to <10 and <12 h, respectively, without significant impact on graft survival (P = 0.47 and 0.42). In HCC patients with model of end-stage liver disease scores (MELD) <20, graft survival was not significantly impaired in the cases of CIT up to 13 h. Conclusion: The negative influence of CIT on liver transplant outcome depends on the underlying disease, patients with HCV-related cirrhosis being at the highest risk of graft loss due to prolonged cold ischemia. Grafts with longer cold preservation times should preferentially be allocated to recipients with alcoholic cirrhosis and HCC patients with MELD <20, in whom the effect of cold ischemia is less pronounced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7235423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72354232020-05-29 The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report Lozanovski, Vladimir J. Döhler, Bernd Weiss, Karl Heinz Mehrabi, Arianeb Süsal, Caner Front Immunol Immunology Introduction: Despite increasing awareness of the negative impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation, its precise influence in different subgroups of liver transplant recipients has not been analyzed in detail. This study aimed to identify liver transplant recipients with an unfavorable outcome due to prolonged cold ischemia. Methods: 40,288 adult liver transplantations, performed between 1998 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. Results: Prolonged CIT significantly reduced graft and patient survival only during the first post-transplant year. On average, each hour added to the cold ischemia was associated with a 3.4% increase in the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 1.034, P < 0.001). The impact of CIT was strongest in patients with hepatitis C-related (HCV) cirrhosis with a 24% higher risk of graft loss already at 8–9 h (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05–1.47, P = 0.011) and 64% higher risk at ≥14 h (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.30–2.09, P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and alcoholic cirrhosis tolerated longer ischemia times up to <10 and <12 h, respectively, without significant impact on graft survival (P = 0.47 and 0.42). In HCC patients with model of end-stage liver disease scores (MELD) <20, graft survival was not significantly impaired in the cases of CIT up to 13 h. Conclusion: The negative influence of CIT on liver transplant outcome depends on the underlying disease, patients with HCV-related cirrhosis being at the highest risk of graft loss due to prolonged cold ischemia. Grafts with longer cold preservation times should preferentially be allocated to recipients with alcoholic cirrhosis and HCC patients with MELD <20, in whom the effect of cold ischemia is less pronounced. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7235423/ /pubmed/32477362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00892 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lozanovski, Döhler, Weiss, Mehrabi and Süsal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Lozanovski, Vladimir J.
Döhler, Bernd
Weiss, Karl Heinz
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Süsal, Caner
The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report
title The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report
title_full The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report
title_fullStr The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report
title_full_unstemmed The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report
title_short The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report
title_sort differential influence of cold ischemia time on outcome after liver transplantation for different indications—who is at risk? a collaborative transplant study report
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477362
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00892
work_keys_str_mv AT lozanovskivladimirj thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT dohlerbernd thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT weisskarlheinz thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT mehrabiarianeb thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT susalcaner thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT lozanovskivladimirj differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT dohlerbernd differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT weisskarlheinz differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT mehrabiarianeb differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport
AT susalcaner differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport