Cargando…
The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report
Introduction: Despite increasing awareness of the negative impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation, its precise influence in different subgroups of liver transplant recipients has not been analyzed in detail. This study aimed to identify liver transplant recipients with an unfavo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00892 |
_version_ | 1783535964841312256 |
---|---|
author | Lozanovski, Vladimir J. Döhler, Bernd Weiss, Karl Heinz Mehrabi, Arianeb Süsal, Caner |
author_facet | Lozanovski, Vladimir J. Döhler, Bernd Weiss, Karl Heinz Mehrabi, Arianeb Süsal, Caner |
author_sort | Lozanovski, Vladimir J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Despite increasing awareness of the negative impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation, its precise influence in different subgroups of liver transplant recipients has not been analyzed in detail. This study aimed to identify liver transplant recipients with an unfavorable outcome due to prolonged cold ischemia. Methods: 40,288 adult liver transplantations, performed between 1998 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. Results: Prolonged CIT significantly reduced graft and patient survival only during the first post-transplant year. On average, each hour added to the cold ischemia was associated with a 3.4% increase in the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 1.034, P < 0.001). The impact of CIT was strongest in patients with hepatitis C-related (HCV) cirrhosis with a 24% higher risk of graft loss already at 8–9 h (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05–1.47, P = 0.011) and 64% higher risk at ≥14 h (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.30–2.09, P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and alcoholic cirrhosis tolerated longer ischemia times up to <10 and <12 h, respectively, without significant impact on graft survival (P = 0.47 and 0.42). In HCC patients with model of end-stage liver disease scores (MELD) <20, graft survival was not significantly impaired in the cases of CIT up to 13 h. Conclusion: The negative influence of CIT on liver transplant outcome depends on the underlying disease, patients with HCV-related cirrhosis being at the highest risk of graft loss due to prolonged cold ischemia. Grafts with longer cold preservation times should preferentially be allocated to recipients with alcoholic cirrhosis and HCC patients with MELD <20, in whom the effect of cold ischemia is less pronounced. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7235423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72354232020-05-29 The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report Lozanovski, Vladimir J. Döhler, Bernd Weiss, Karl Heinz Mehrabi, Arianeb Süsal, Caner Front Immunol Immunology Introduction: Despite increasing awareness of the negative impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation, its precise influence in different subgroups of liver transplant recipients has not been analyzed in detail. This study aimed to identify liver transplant recipients with an unfavorable outcome due to prolonged cold ischemia. Methods: 40,288 adult liver transplantations, performed between 1998 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. Results: Prolonged CIT significantly reduced graft and patient survival only during the first post-transplant year. On average, each hour added to the cold ischemia was associated with a 3.4% increase in the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 1.034, P < 0.001). The impact of CIT was strongest in patients with hepatitis C-related (HCV) cirrhosis with a 24% higher risk of graft loss already at 8–9 h (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05–1.47, P = 0.011) and 64% higher risk at ≥14 h (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.30–2.09, P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and alcoholic cirrhosis tolerated longer ischemia times up to <10 and <12 h, respectively, without significant impact on graft survival (P = 0.47 and 0.42). In HCC patients with model of end-stage liver disease scores (MELD) <20, graft survival was not significantly impaired in the cases of CIT up to 13 h. Conclusion: The negative influence of CIT on liver transplant outcome depends on the underlying disease, patients with HCV-related cirrhosis being at the highest risk of graft loss due to prolonged cold ischemia. Grafts with longer cold preservation times should preferentially be allocated to recipients with alcoholic cirrhosis and HCC patients with MELD <20, in whom the effect of cold ischemia is less pronounced. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7235423/ /pubmed/32477362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00892 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lozanovski, Döhler, Weiss, Mehrabi and Süsal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Lozanovski, Vladimir J. Döhler, Bernd Weiss, Karl Heinz Mehrabi, Arianeb Süsal, Caner The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report |
title | The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report |
title_full | The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report |
title_fullStr | The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report |
title_full_unstemmed | The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report |
title_short | The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications—Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report |
title_sort | differential influence of cold ischemia time on outcome after liver transplantation for different indications—who is at risk? a collaborative transplant study report |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lozanovskivladimirj thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT dohlerbernd thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT weisskarlheinz thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT mehrabiarianeb thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT susalcaner thedifferentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT lozanovskivladimirj differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT dohlerbernd differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT weisskarlheinz differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT mehrabiarianeb differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport AT susalcaner differentialinfluenceofcoldischemiatimeonoutcomeafterlivertransplantationfordifferentindicationswhoisatriskacollaborativetransplantstudyreport |