Cargando…

A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment

Marketing weight is an important economic variable that impacts the productivity and profitability of finishing pig production. Marketing weight has been increasing worldwide over the past decades driven by the dilution of fixed production cost over more weight per pig and the improvement of genetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, F., Vierck, K. R., DeRouchey, J. M., O'Quinn, T. G., Tokach, M. D., Goodband, R. D., Dritz, S. S., Woodworth, J. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704624
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2016.0004
_version_ 1783535974733578240
author Wu, F.
Vierck, K. R.
DeRouchey, J. M.
O'Quinn, T. G.
Tokach, M. D.
Goodband, R. D.
Dritz, S. S.
Woodworth, J. C.
author_facet Wu, F.
Vierck, K. R.
DeRouchey, J. M.
O'Quinn, T. G.
Tokach, M. D.
Goodband, R. D.
Dritz, S. S.
Woodworth, J. C.
author_sort Wu, F.
collection PubMed
description Marketing weight is an important economic variable that impacts the productivity and profitability of finishing pig production. Marketing weight has been increasing worldwide over the past decades driven by the dilution of fixed production cost over more weight per pig and the improvement of genetic selection of lean-type pigs. This review was aimed to summarize current knowledge and assess the future research needs on producing finishing pigs with marketing weight greater than 130 kg. Based on a thorough literature review, increasing marketing weight affected overall pig growth; in particular, cumulative average daily gain (ADG) decreased by 4.0 g, average daily feed intake (ADFI) increased by 78.1 g, and gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) decreased by 0.011 for every 10 kg increase of marketing weight. Increasing marketing weight by 10 kg increased carcass yield by 0.41% units, backfat by 1.8 mm, longissimus muscle (LM) area by 1.9 cm(2), carcass length by 2.2 cm, and belly yield by 0.32% units, but decreased percentage of fat-free-lean by 0.78 units and decreased loin, shoulder, and ham yields by 0.13, 0.16, and 0.17% units, respectively. Studies that investigated the effects of marketing weight on pork quality observed decreased pH by 0.02 and 0.01 at 45 min and 24 h postmortem, respectively, and increased a* value by 0.28 per 10 kg marketing weight increase. Heavier market pigs had increased concentrations of saturated fatty acids and intramuscular fat. However, studies reported conflicting results for L* and b* values, drip loss, Warner-Bratzler shear force, and sensory properties of pigs in response to increasing marketing weight. A limited amount of research has been conducted to estimate nutrient requirements for pigs greater than 140 kg. Increased weight and size of heavy pigs can create challenges to farm and packer facilities and equipment. Discussions and recommendations are provided concerning the adjustments for floor and feeder space, barn design, ventilation, disease control, transportation, and carcass processing needed for increasing marketing weight. In conclusion, increasing marketing weight creates both opportunities and challenges to current finishing pig production, and future research is needed to provide nutritional and management guidelines and improve feed efficiency and meat quality of heavy weight market pigs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7235466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72354662020-07-22 A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment Wu, F. Vierck, K. R. DeRouchey, J. M. O'Quinn, T. G. Tokach, M. D. Goodband, R. D. Dritz, S. S. Woodworth, J. C. Transl Anim Sci Review Article Marketing weight is an important economic variable that impacts the productivity and profitability of finishing pig production. Marketing weight has been increasing worldwide over the past decades driven by the dilution of fixed production cost over more weight per pig and the improvement of genetic selection of lean-type pigs. This review was aimed to summarize current knowledge and assess the future research needs on producing finishing pigs with marketing weight greater than 130 kg. Based on a thorough literature review, increasing marketing weight affected overall pig growth; in particular, cumulative average daily gain (ADG) decreased by 4.0 g, average daily feed intake (ADFI) increased by 78.1 g, and gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) decreased by 0.011 for every 10 kg increase of marketing weight. Increasing marketing weight by 10 kg increased carcass yield by 0.41% units, backfat by 1.8 mm, longissimus muscle (LM) area by 1.9 cm(2), carcass length by 2.2 cm, and belly yield by 0.32% units, but decreased percentage of fat-free-lean by 0.78 units and decreased loin, shoulder, and ham yields by 0.13, 0.16, and 0.17% units, respectively. Studies that investigated the effects of marketing weight on pork quality observed decreased pH by 0.02 and 0.01 at 45 min and 24 h postmortem, respectively, and increased a* value by 0.28 per 10 kg marketing weight increase. Heavier market pigs had increased concentrations of saturated fatty acids and intramuscular fat. However, studies reported conflicting results for L* and b* values, drip loss, Warner-Bratzler shear force, and sensory properties of pigs in response to increasing marketing weight. A limited amount of research has been conducted to estimate nutrient requirements for pigs greater than 140 kg. Increased weight and size of heavy pigs can create challenges to farm and packer facilities and equipment. Discussions and recommendations are provided concerning the adjustments for floor and feeder space, barn design, ventilation, disease control, transportation, and carcass processing needed for increasing marketing weight. In conclusion, increasing marketing weight creates both opportunities and challenges to current finishing pig production, and future research is needed to provide nutritional and management guidelines and improve feed efficiency and meat quality of heavy weight market pigs. Oxford University Press 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7235466/ /pubmed/32704624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2016.0004 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review Article
Wu, F.
Vierck, K. R.
DeRouchey, J. M.
O'Quinn, T. G.
Tokach, M. D.
Goodband, R. D.
Dritz, S. S.
Woodworth, J. C.
A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment
title A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment
title_full A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment
title_fullStr A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment
title_full_unstemmed A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment
title_short A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment
title_sort review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704624
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/tas2016.0004
work_keys_str_mv AT wuf areviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT vierckkr areviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT deroucheyjm areviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT oquinntg areviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT tokachmd areviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT goodbandrd areviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT dritzss areviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT woodworthjc areviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT wuf reviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT vierckkr reviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT deroucheyjm reviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT oquinntg reviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT tokachmd reviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT goodbandrd reviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT dritzss reviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment
AT woodworthjc reviewofheavyweightmarketpigsstatusofknowledgeandfutureneedsassessment