Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples

Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRTPCR) has been the main method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. De-identified results from upper and lower respiratory samples submitted to a reference laboratory demonstrated a positivity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleiboeker, Steven, Cowden, Scott, Grantham, James, Nutt, Jamie, Tyler, Aaron, Berg, Amy, Altrich, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104439
_version_ 1783535987330121728
author Kleiboeker, Steven
Cowden, Scott
Grantham, James
Nutt, Jamie
Tyler, Aaron
Berg, Amy
Altrich, Michelle
author_facet Kleiboeker, Steven
Cowden, Scott
Grantham, James
Nutt, Jamie
Tyler, Aaron
Berg, Amy
Altrich, Michelle
author_sort Kleiboeker, Steven
collection PubMed
description Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRTPCR) has been the main method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. De-identified results from upper and lower respiratory samples submitted to a reference laboratory demonstrated a positivity rate of 14.9 % (4428 of 29,713 samples tested). Distribution of results by birth year cohort and specimen type suggested general consistency in mean, median and peak values but higher positivity rates in individuals born from 1964 to 1974. Female patients had a significantly lower positivity rate (P < 0.0001), although similar load mean and median values, compared to males. Overall, 15.3 % (676 of 4428 positive results) of positive results had viral loads greater than 8 log10 copies/mL, with occasional samples exceeding 10 log10 copies/mL. These results support quantitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in patient testing and efforts to control viral transmission
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7235577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72355772020-05-19 SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples Kleiboeker, Steven Cowden, Scott Grantham, James Nutt, Jamie Tyler, Aaron Berg, Amy Altrich, Michelle J Clin Virol Article Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRTPCR) has been the main method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. De-identified results from upper and lower respiratory samples submitted to a reference laboratory demonstrated a positivity rate of 14.9 % (4428 of 29,713 samples tested). Distribution of results by birth year cohort and specimen type suggested general consistency in mean, median and peak values but higher positivity rates in individuals born from 1964 to 1974. Female patients had a significantly lower positivity rate (P < 0.0001), although similar load mean and median values, compared to males. Overall, 15.3 % (676 of 4428 positive results) of positive results had viral loads greater than 8 log10 copies/mL, with occasional samples exceeding 10 log10 copies/mL. These results support quantitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in patient testing and efforts to control viral transmission Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-08 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7235577/ /pubmed/32674034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104439 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Kleiboeker, Steven
Cowden, Scott
Grantham, James
Nutt, Jamie
Tyler, Aaron
Berg, Amy
Altrich, Michelle
SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples
title SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples
title_full SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples
title_short SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples
title_sort sars-cov-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104439
work_keys_str_mv AT kleiboekersteven sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples
AT cowdenscott sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples
AT granthamjames sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples
AT nuttjamie sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples
AT tyleraaron sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples
AT bergamy sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples
AT altrichmichelle sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples