Cargando…
SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples
Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRTPCR) has been the main method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. De-identified results from upper and lower respiratory samples submitted to a reference laboratory demonstrated a positivity...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104439 |
_version_ | 1783535987330121728 |
---|---|
author | Kleiboeker, Steven Cowden, Scott Grantham, James Nutt, Jamie Tyler, Aaron Berg, Amy Altrich, Michelle |
author_facet | Kleiboeker, Steven Cowden, Scott Grantham, James Nutt, Jamie Tyler, Aaron Berg, Amy Altrich, Michelle |
author_sort | Kleiboeker, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRTPCR) has been the main method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. De-identified results from upper and lower respiratory samples submitted to a reference laboratory demonstrated a positivity rate of 14.9 % (4428 of 29,713 samples tested). Distribution of results by birth year cohort and specimen type suggested general consistency in mean, median and peak values but higher positivity rates in individuals born from 1964 to 1974. Female patients had a significantly lower positivity rate (P < 0.0001), although similar load mean and median values, compared to males. Overall, 15.3 % (676 of 4428 positive results) of positive results had viral loads greater than 8 log10 copies/mL, with occasional samples exceeding 10 log10 copies/mL. These results support quantitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in patient testing and efforts to control viral transmission |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7235577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72355772020-05-19 SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples Kleiboeker, Steven Cowden, Scott Grantham, James Nutt, Jamie Tyler, Aaron Berg, Amy Altrich, Michelle J Clin Virol Article Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRTPCR) has been the main method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. De-identified results from upper and lower respiratory samples submitted to a reference laboratory demonstrated a positivity rate of 14.9 % (4428 of 29,713 samples tested). Distribution of results by birth year cohort and specimen type suggested general consistency in mean, median and peak values but higher positivity rates in individuals born from 1964 to 1974. Female patients had a significantly lower positivity rate (P < 0.0001), although similar load mean and median values, compared to males. Overall, 15.3 % (676 of 4428 positive results) of positive results had viral loads greater than 8 log10 copies/mL, with occasional samples exceeding 10 log10 copies/mL. These results support quantitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in patient testing and efforts to control viral transmission Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-08 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7235577/ /pubmed/32674034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104439 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Kleiboeker, Steven Cowden, Scott Grantham, James Nutt, Jamie Tyler, Aaron Berg, Amy Altrich, Michelle SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples |
title | SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples |
title_full | SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples |
title_fullStr | SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples |
title_full_unstemmed | SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples |
title_short | SARS-CoV-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples |
title_sort | sars-cov-2 viral load assessment in respiratory samples |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleiboekersteven sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples AT cowdenscott sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples AT granthamjames sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples AT nuttjamie sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples AT tyleraaron sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples AT bergamy sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples AT altrichmichelle sarscov2viralloadassessmentinrespiratorysamples |