Cargando…

Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI

This cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the patient’s perspective alongside a randomized controlled trial comparing corifollitropin alfa with follitropin beta for a single stimulation cycle. Only unit costs paid by patients are included in this analysis. The incremental cost-effectivenes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoa, Le Dang, Lan, Vuong Thi Ngoc, Loc, Nguyen Minh Tai, Vinh, Dang Quang, Tran, Quang Nhat, Tuong, Ho Manh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32455172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.002
_version_ 1783535995736555520
author Khoa, Le Dang
Lan, Vuong Thi Ngoc
Loc, Nguyen Minh Tai
Vinh, Dang Quang
Tran, Quang Nhat
Tuong, Ho Manh
author_facet Khoa, Le Dang
Lan, Vuong Thi Ngoc
Loc, Nguyen Minh Tai
Vinh, Dang Quang
Tran, Quang Nhat
Tuong, Ho Manh
author_sort Khoa, Le Dang
collection PubMed
description This cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the patient’s perspective alongside a randomized controlled trial comparing corifollitropin alfa with follitropin beta for a single stimulation cycle. Only unit costs paid by patients are included in this analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were also performed. Baseline characteristics (except for the number of follicles and frozen embryos), treatment outcomes and complications were similar in the two groups. The live birth rate was comparable between the two groups, but the mean total cost per patient was higher for the corifollitropin alfa strategy (€4293) compared with the follitropin beta strategy (€4086). Costs per live birth were €13,726 and €12,511, respectively. The difference in effect between corifollitropin alfa and collitropin beta was three fewer live births, and the difference in costs was €24,048. The probability of live birth after the first and second embryo transfers and the proportion of patients who had no more frozen embryos available after non-achievement of live birth in the first or second transfer influenced the comparative cost-effectiveness of the two strategies. PSA showed that a corifollitropin alfa strategy would be rejected in up to 27.4% of scenarios. Follitropin beta 300 IU/day was more cost-effective than corifollitropin alfa 150 μg in women aged 35–42 years weighing ≥ 50 kg undergoing in-vitro fertilzation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7235613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72356132020-05-22 Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI Khoa, Le Dang Lan, Vuong Thi Ngoc Loc, Nguyen Minh Tai Vinh, Dang Quang Tran, Quang Nhat Tuong, Ho Manh Reprod Biomed Soc Online Economics This cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the patient’s perspective alongside a randomized controlled trial comparing corifollitropin alfa with follitropin beta for a single stimulation cycle. Only unit costs paid by patients are included in this analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were also performed. Baseline characteristics (except for the number of follicles and frozen embryos), treatment outcomes and complications were similar in the two groups. The live birth rate was comparable between the two groups, but the mean total cost per patient was higher for the corifollitropin alfa strategy (€4293) compared with the follitropin beta strategy (€4086). Costs per live birth were €13,726 and €12,511, respectively. The difference in effect between corifollitropin alfa and collitropin beta was three fewer live births, and the difference in costs was €24,048. The probability of live birth after the first and second embryo transfers and the proportion of patients who had no more frozen embryos available after non-achievement of live birth in the first or second transfer influenced the comparative cost-effectiveness of the two strategies. PSA showed that a corifollitropin alfa strategy would be rejected in up to 27.4% of scenarios. Follitropin beta 300 IU/day was more cost-effective than corifollitropin alfa 150 μg in women aged 35–42 years weighing ≥ 50 kg undergoing in-vitro fertilzation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Elsevier 2020-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7235613/ /pubmed/32455172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.002 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Economics
Khoa, Le Dang
Lan, Vuong Thi Ngoc
Loc, Nguyen Minh Tai
Vinh, Dang Quang
Tran, Quang Nhat
Tuong, Ho Manh
Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI
title Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI
title_full Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI
title_fullStr Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI
title_full_unstemmed Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI
title_short Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI
title_sort corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing ivf/icsi
topic Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32455172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT khoaledang corifollitropinalfaversusfollitropinbetaaneconomicanalysisalongsidearandomizedcontrolledtrialinwomenundergoingivficsi
AT lanvuongthingoc corifollitropinalfaversusfollitropinbetaaneconomicanalysisalongsidearandomizedcontrolledtrialinwomenundergoingivficsi
AT locnguyenminhtai corifollitropinalfaversusfollitropinbetaaneconomicanalysisalongsidearandomizedcontrolledtrialinwomenundergoingivficsi
AT vinhdangquang corifollitropinalfaversusfollitropinbetaaneconomicanalysisalongsidearandomizedcontrolledtrialinwomenundergoingivficsi
AT tranquangnhat corifollitropinalfaversusfollitropinbetaaneconomicanalysisalongsidearandomizedcontrolledtrialinwomenundergoingivficsi
AT tuonghomanh corifollitropinalfaversusfollitropinbetaaneconomicanalysisalongsidearandomizedcontrolledtrialinwomenundergoingivficsi