Cargando…
Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of chronic kidney disease (CKD) guidelines. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and guideline-related websites were searched from 2008 to 2019. The CKD guidelines were included. Two reviewers used the RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guideline...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622320922017 |
_version_ | 1783536008509259776 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Yang Li, Yanyan Li, Junwei Song, Weijuan Zhao, Jun Xu, Yan Zhai, Yongxia Xu, Shuaimin |
author_facet | Zhao, Yang Li, Yanyan Li, Junwei Song, Weijuan Zhao, Jun Xu, Yan Zhai, Yongxia Xu, Shuaimin |
author_sort | Zhao, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of chronic kidney disease (CKD) guidelines. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and guideline-related websites were searched from 2008 to 2019. The CKD guidelines were included. Two reviewers used the RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare) checklist to assess the quality of guidelines and calculate the reporting proportion of each guideline. RESULTS: We included 13 guidelines, of which 30.8% (4/13) were developed in Europe and about two-thirds (8/13) were published on their own website. The average quality of the 13 guidelines was 68.57%. The reporting proportion of the seven domains (i.e. basic information; background; evidence; recommendations; review and quality assurance; funding and declaration and management of interests; other information) were 65.39%, 81.73%, 63.08%, 69.23%, 53.85%, 63.46%, and 61.54%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CKD guidelines had moderate reporting quality in some domains, but guideline developers should increase the reporting items in basic information, guideline evidence, and recommendations. The RIGHT checklist would be a useful tool to improve the reporting quality of guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7235670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72356702020-06-09 Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis Zhao, Yang Li, Yanyan Li, Junwei Song, Weijuan Zhao, Jun Xu, Yan Zhai, Yongxia Xu, Shuaimin Ther Adv Chronic Dis Systematic Review AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of chronic kidney disease (CKD) guidelines. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and guideline-related websites were searched from 2008 to 2019. The CKD guidelines were included. Two reviewers used the RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare) checklist to assess the quality of guidelines and calculate the reporting proportion of each guideline. RESULTS: We included 13 guidelines, of which 30.8% (4/13) were developed in Europe and about two-thirds (8/13) were published on their own website. The average quality of the 13 guidelines was 68.57%. The reporting proportion of the seven domains (i.e. basic information; background; evidence; recommendations; review and quality assurance; funding and declaration and management of interests; other information) were 65.39%, 81.73%, 63.08%, 69.23%, 53.85%, 63.46%, and 61.54%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CKD guidelines had moderate reporting quality in some domains, but guideline developers should increase the reporting items in basic information, guideline evidence, and recommendations. The RIGHT checklist would be a useful tool to improve the reporting quality of guidelines. SAGE Publications 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7235670/ /pubmed/32523665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622320922017 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Zhao, Yang Li, Yanyan Li, Junwei Song, Weijuan Zhao, Jun Xu, Yan Zhai, Yongxia Xu, Shuaimin Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis |
title | Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis |
title_full | Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis |
title_fullStr | Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis |
title_short | Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis |
title_sort | reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the right statement: a systematic analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622320922017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoyang reportingqualityofchronickidneydiseasepracticeguidelinesaccordingtotherightstatementasystematicanalysis AT liyanyan reportingqualityofchronickidneydiseasepracticeguidelinesaccordingtotherightstatementasystematicanalysis AT lijunwei reportingqualityofchronickidneydiseasepracticeguidelinesaccordingtotherightstatementasystematicanalysis AT songweijuan reportingqualityofchronickidneydiseasepracticeguidelinesaccordingtotherightstatementasystematicanalysis AT zhaojun reportingqualityofchronickidneydiseasepracticeguidelinesaccordingtotherightstatementasystematicanalysis AT xuyan reportingqualityofchronickidneydiseasepracticeguidelinesaccordingtotherightstatementasystematicanalysis AT zhaiyongxia reportingqualityofchronickidneydiseasepracticeguidelinesaccordingtotherightstatementasystematicanalysis AT xushuaimin reportingqualityofchronickidneydiseasepracticeguidelinesaccordingtotherightstatementasystematicanalysis |