Cargando…
Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of chronic kidney disease (CKD) guidelines. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and guideline-related websites were searched from 2008 to 2019. The CKD guidelines were included. Two reviewers used the RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guideline...
Autores principales: | Zhao, Yang, Li, Yanyan, Li, Junwei, Song, Weijuan, Zhao, Jun, Xu, Yan, Zhai, Yongxia, Xu, Shuaimin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622320922017 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review
por: Wang, Can, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Using the RIGHT statement to evaluate the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines in traditional Chinese medicine
por: Yun, Xia, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
por: O'Donoghue, K. J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Reporting quality of European and Croatian health practice guidelines according to the RIGHT reporting checklist
por: Tokalić, Ružica, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Guideline-based quality indicators—a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines
por: Becker, Monika, et al.
Publicado: (2019)