Cargando…

The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology

BACKGROUND: Faecal occult blood test (FOBT) has demonstrated effectiveness in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Faecal calprotectin (FC) has proven efficient for evaluating activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its value in CRC detection is less established. Most symptomatic patients ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lué, Alberto, Hijos, Gonzalo, Sostres, Carlos, Perales, Alba, Navarro, Mercedes, Barra, Maria Victoria, Mascialino, Barbara, Andalucia, Carmen, Puente, Juan José, Lanas, Ángel, Gomollon, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820920786
_version_ 1783536008752529408
author Lué, Alberto
Hijos, Gonzalo
Sostres, Carlos
Perales, Alba
Navarro, Mercedes
Barra, Maria Victoria
Mascialino, Barbara
Andalucia, Carmen
Puente, Juan José
Lanas, Ángel
Gomollon, Fernando
author_facet Lué, Alberto
Hijos, Gonzalo
Sostres, Carlos
Perales, Alba
Navarro, Mercedes
Barra, Maria Victoria
Mascialino, Barbara
Andalucia, Carmen
Puente, Juan José
Lanas, Ángel
Gomollon, Fernando
author_sort Lué, Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Faecal occult blood test (FOBT) has demonstrated effectiveness in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Faecal calprotectin (FC) has proven efficient for evaluating activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its value in CRC detection is less established. Most symptomatic patients have benign pathologies, but still undergo colonoscopy in many settings. AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the combination of FOBT plus FC in symptomatic patients. METHODS: Patients who completed colonic investigations and returned stool samples, on which FOBT and FC were performed, were recruited prospectively. CRC, advanced adenoma, IBD and angiodysplasia were considered as relevant pathologies. RESULTS: A total of 404 patients were included, of whom 87 (21.5%) had relevant pathologies. Sensitivity and specificity were 50.6% and 69.6% for FOBT, 78.2% and 54.4% for FC. Negative predictive value (NPV) was 90.1% for FC and 86.9% for FOBT. NPV for the combination of FOBT and FC was 94.1%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.5% and 50.3%. The area under ROC (receiver operator curve) (AUC) was 0.741 for FOBT, 0.736 for FC and 0.816 for the combination. The total cost for visits and procedures was €233,016 (€577/patient). Using a combination of FOBT and FC as pre-endoscopic tool allows colonoscopies to be reduced by 39.4%, reducing total costs by 20.5%. CONCLUSION: The combination of FOBT and FC has a better diagnostic accuracy compared with each test alone. Performing both tests before colonoscopy is a less costly and more effective strategy, reducing unnecessary procedures and complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7235671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72356712020-06-09 The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology Lué, Alberto Hijos, Gonzalo Sostres, Carlos Perales, Alba Navarro, Mercedes Barra, Maria Victoria Mascialino, Barbara Andalucia, Carmen Puente, Juan José Lanas, Ángel Gomollon, Fernando Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Faecal occult blood test (FOBT) has demonstrated effectiveness in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Faecal calprotectin (FC) has proven efficient for evaluating activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its value in CRC detection is less established. Most symptomatic patients have benign pathologies, but still undergo colonoscopy in many settings. AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the combination of FOBT plus FC in symptomatic patients. METHODS: Patients who completed colonic investigations and returned stool samples, on which FOBT and FC were performed, were recruited prospectively. CRC, advanced adenoma, IBD and angiodysplasia were considered as relevant pathologies. RESULTS: A total of 404 patients were included, of whom 87 (21.5%) had relevant pathologies. Sensitivity and specificity were 50.6% and 69.6% for FOBT, 78.2% and 54.4% for FC. Negative predictive value (NPV) was 90.1% for FC and 86.9% for FOBT. NPV for the combination of FOBT and FC was 94.1%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.5% and 50.3%. The area under ROC (receiver operator curve) (AUC) was 0.741 for FOBT, 0.736 for FC and 0.816 for the combination. The total cost for visits and procedures was €233,016 (€577/patient). Using a combination of FOBT and FC as pre-endoscopic tool allows colonoscopies to be reduced by 39.4%, reducing total costs by 20.5%. CONCLUSION: The combination of FOBT and FC has a better diagnostic accuracy compared with each test alone. Performing both tests before colonoscopy is a less costly and more effective strategy, reducing unnecessary procedures and complications. SAGE Publications 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7235671/ /pubmed/32523623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820920786 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lué, Alberto
Hijos, Gonzalo
Sostres, Carlos
Perales, Alba
Navarro, Mercedes
Barra, Maria Victoria
Mascialino, Barbara
Andalucia, Carmen
Puente, Juan José
Lanas, Ángel
Gomollon, Fernando
The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology
title The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology
title_full The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology
title_fullStr The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology
title_full_unstemmed The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology
title_short The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology
title_sort combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820920786
work_keys_str_mv AT luealberto thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT hijosgonzalo thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT sostrescarlos thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT peralesalba thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT navarromercedes thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT barramariavictoria thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT mascialinobarbara thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT andaluciacarmen thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT puentejuanjose thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT lanasangel thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT gomollonfernando thecombinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT luealberto combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT hijosgonzalo combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT sostrescarlos combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT peralesalba combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT navarromercedes combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT barramariavictoria combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT mascialinobarbara combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT andaluciacarmen combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT puentejuanjose combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT lanasangel combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology
AT gomollonfernando combinationofquantitativefaecaloccultbloodtestandfaecalcalprotectinisacosteffectivestrategytoavoidcolonoscopiesinsymptomaticpatientswithoutrelevantpathology