Cargando…

TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis

Total brain white matter lesion (WML) volume is the most widely established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome measure in studies of multiple sclerosis (MS). To estimate WML volume, there are a number of automatic segmentation methods available, yet manual delineation remains the gold standard...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valcarcel, Alessandra M., Muschelli, John, Pham, Dzung L., Martin, Melissa Lynne, Yushkevich, Paul, Brandstadter, Rachel, Patterson, Kristina R., Schindler, Matthew K., Calabresi, Peter A., Bakshi, Rohit, Shinohara, Russell T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32428847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102256
_version_ 1783536088507219968
author Valcarcel, Alessandra M.
Muschelli, John
Pham, Dzung L.
Martin, Melissa Lynne
Yushkevich, Paul
Brandstadter, Rachel
Patterson, Kristina R.
Schindler, Matthew K.
Calabresi, Peter A.
Bakshi, Rohit
Shinohara, Russell T.
author_facet Valcarcel, Alessandra M.
Muschelli, John
Pham, Dzung L.
Martin, Melissa Lynne
Yushkevich, Paul
Brandstadter, Rachel
Patterson, Kristina R.
Schindler, Matthew K.
Calabresi, Peter A.
Bakshi, Rohit
Shinohara, Russell T.
author_sort Valcarcel, Alessandra M.
collection PubMed
description Total brain white matter lesion (WML) volume is the most widely established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome measure in studies of multiple sclerosis (MS). To estimate WML volume, there are a number of automatic segmentation methods available, yet manual delineation remains the gold standard approach. Automatic approaches often yield a probability map to which a threshold is applied to create lesion segmentation masks. Unfortunately, few approaches systematically determine the threshold employed; many methods use a manually selected threshold, thus introducing human error and bias into the automated procedure. In this study, we propose and validate an automatic thresholding algorithm, Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis (TAPAS), to obtain subject-specific threshold estimates for probability map automatic segmentation of T2-weighted (T2) hyperintense WMLs. Using multimodal MRI, the proposed method applies an automatic segmentation algorithm to obtain probability maps. We obtain the true subject-specific threshold that maximizes the Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Then the subject-specific thresholds are modeled on a naive estimate of volume using a generalized additive model. Applying this model, we predict a subject-specific threshold in data not used for training. We ran a Monte Carlo-resampled split-sample cross-validation (100 validation sets) using two data sets: the first obtained from the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) on a Philips 3 Tesla (3T) scanner (n = 94) and a second collected at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) using a Siemens 3T scanner (n = 40). By means of the proposed automated technique, in the JHH data we found an average reduction in subject-level absolute error of 0.1 mL per one mL increase in manual volume. Using Bland-Altman analysis, we found that volumetric bias associated with group-level thresholding was mitigated when applying TAPAS. The BWH data showed similar absolute error estimates using group-level thresholding or TAPAS likely since Bland-Altman analyses indicated no systematic biases associated with group or TAPAS volume estimates. The current study presents the first validated fully automated method for subject-specific threshold prediction to segment brain lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7236059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72360592020-05-22 TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis Valcarcel, Alessandra M. Muschelli, John Pham, Dzung L. Martin, Melissa Lynne Yushkevich, Paul Brandstadter, Rachel Patterson, Kristina R. Schindler, Matthew K. Calabresi, Peter A. Bakshi, Rohit Shinohara, Russell T. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Total brain white matter lesion (WML) volume is the most widely established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome measure in studies of multiple sclerosis (MS). To estimate WML volume, there are a number of automatic segmentation methods available, yet manual delineation remains the gold standard approach. Automatic approaches often yield a probability map to which a threshold is applied to create lesion segmentation masks. Unfortunately, few approaches systematically determine the threshold employed; many methods use a manually selected threshold, thus introducing human error and bias into the automated procedure. In this study, we propose and validate an automatic thresholding algorithm, Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis (TAPAS), to obtain subject-specific threshold estimates for probability map automatic segmentation of T2-weighted (T2) hyperintense WMLs. Using multimodal MRI, the proposed method applies an automatic segmentation algorithm to obtain probability maps. We obtain the true subject-specific threshold that maximizes the Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Then the subject-specific thresholds are modeled on a naive estimate of volume using a generalized additive model. Applying this model, we predict a subject-specific threshold in data not used for training. We ran a Monte Carlo-resampled split-sample cross-validation (100 validation sets) using two data sets: the first obtained from the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) on a Philips 3 Tesla (3T) scanner (n = 94) and a second collected at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) using a Siemens 3T scanner (n = 40). By means of the proposed automated technique, in the JHH data we found an average reduction in subject-level absolute error of 0.1 mL per one mL increase in manual volume. Using Bland-Altman analysis, we found that volumetric bias associated with group-level thresholding was mitigated when applying TAPAS. The BWH data showed similar absolute error estimates using group-level thresholding or TAPAS likely since Bland-Altman analyses indicated no systematic biases associated with group or TAPAS volume estimates. The current study presents the first validated fully automated method for subject-specific threshold prediction to segment brain lesions. Elsevier 2020-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7236059/ /pubmed/32428847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102256 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Valcarcel, Alessandra M.
Muschelli, John
Pham, Dzung L.
Martin, Melissa Lynne
Yushkevich, Paul
Brandstadter, Rachel
Patterson, Kristina R.
Schindler, Matthew K.
Calabresi, Peter A.
Bakshi, Rohit
Shinohara, Russell T.
TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis
title TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis
title_full TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis
title_short TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort tapas: a thresholding approach for probability map automatic segmentation in multiple sclerosis
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32428847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102256
work_keys_str_mv AT valcarcelalessandram tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT muschellijohn tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT phamdzungl tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT martinmelissalynne tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT yushkevichpaul tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT brandstadterrachel tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT pattersonkristinar tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT schindlermatthewk tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT calabresipetera tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT bakshirohit tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis
AT shinohararussellt tapasathresholdingapproachforprobabilitymapautomaticsegmentationinmultiplesclerosis