Cargando…

Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis

INTRODUCTION: This study compared surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective comparative study, 75 patients were treated with the Ilizarov technique for aseptic posttraumatic p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szelerski, Łukasz, Żarek, Sławomir, Górski, Radosław, Mochocki, Karol, Górski, Ryszard, Morasiewicz, Piotr, Małdyk, Paweł
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01697-4
_version_ 1783536097508196352
author Szelerski, Łukasz
Żarek, Sławomir
Górski, Radosław
Mochocki, Karol
Górski, Ryszard
Morasiewicz, Piotr
Małdyk, Paweł
author_facet Szelerski, Łukasz
Żarek, Sławomir
Górski, Radosław
Mochocki, Karol
Górski, Ryszard
Morasiewicz, Piotr
Małdyk, Paweł
author_sort Szelerski, Łukasz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study compared surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective comparative study, 75 patients were treated with the Ilizarov technique for aseptic posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia in the period 2000–2016. We compared them with the 51 patients from the control group, treated for tibial bone union disturbances using internal osteosynthesis methods, i.e., internal-fixation plates and intramedullary nails. The study groups were compared in terms of the rates of union, time to union, and the baseline-to-postoperative difference in lower leg deformity. RESULTS: Union rate in the Ilizarov group was 100% and the control group was 51.92% (p < 0.001). The median time to union suggests that patients from the Ilizarov group needed a shorter time to achieve bone union (203.00 days vs. 271.00 days) (p = 0.091). The effect size in the Ilizarov group was larger both in terms of reducing both limb deformity and shortening (it is worth noting, however, that the Ilizarov treatment was used in patients with higher baseline values of both these parameters). We observed no significant difference in terms of time to union between the group of patients with at least one risk factor for disturbance in fracture healing and the group with no risk factors. The following risk factors were considered: diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid therapy, smoking, alcohol dependence, and advanced lower-extremity vascular disease (p = 0.827). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated a high effectiveness of the Ilizarov method in the treatment of aseptic posttraumatic pseudarthroses of the tibia. The Ilizarov method seems to be worth considering in all cases where either the patient or the nature of injury is associated with additional risk factors and whenever there is a need for leg deformity correction or leg elongation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7236123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72361232020-05-27 Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis Szelerski, Łukasz Żarek, Sławomir Górski, Radosław Mochocki, Karol Górski, Ryszard Morasiewicz, Piotr Małdyk, Paweł J Orthop Surg Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: This study compared surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective comparative study, 75 patients were treated with the Ilizarov technique for aseptic posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia in the period 2000–2016. We compared them with the 51 patients from the control group, treated for tibial bone union disturbances using internal osteosynthesis methods, i.e., internal-fixation plates and intramedullary nails. The study groups were compared in terms of the rates of union, time to union, and the baseline-to-postoperative difference in lower leg deformity. RESULTS: Union rate in the Ilizarov group was 100% and the control group was 51.92% (p < 0.001). The median time to union suggests that patients from the Ilizarov group needed a shorter time to achieve bone union (203.00 days vs. 271.00 days) (p = 0.091). The effect size in the Ilizarov group was larger both in terms of reducing both limb deformity and shortening (it is worth noting, however, that the Ilizarov treatment was used in patients with higher baseline values of both these parameters). We observed no significant difference in terms of time to union between the group of patients with at least one risk factor for disturbance in fracture healing and the group with no risk factors. The following risk factors were considered: diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid therapy, smoking, alcohol dependence, and advanced lower-extremity vascular disease (p = 0.827). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated a high effectiveness of the Ilizarov method in the treatment of aseptic posttraumatic pseudarthroses of the tibia. The Ilizarov method seems to be worth considering in all cases where either the patient or the nature of injury is associated with additional risk factors and whenever there is a need for leg deformity correction or leg elongation. BioMed Central 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7236123/ /pubmed/32430044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01697-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Szelerski, Łukasz
Żarek, Sławomir
Górski, Radosław
Mochocki, Karol
Górski, Ryszard
Morasiewicz, Piotr
Małdyk, Paweł
Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis
title Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis
title_full Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis
title_fullStr Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis
title_short Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis
title_sort surgical treatment outcomes of the ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01697-4
work_keys_str_mv AT szelerskiłukasz surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis
AT zareksławomir surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis
AT gorskiradosław surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis
AT mochockikarol surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis
AT gorskiryszard surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis
AT morasiewiczpiotr surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis
AT małdykpaweł surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis