Cargando…
Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis
INTRODUCTION: This study compared surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective comparative study, 75 patients were treated with the Ilizarov technique for aseptic posttraumatic p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01697-4 |
_version_ | 1783536097508196352 |
---|---|
author | Szelerski, Łukasz Żarek, Sławomir Górski, Radosław Mochocki, Karol Górski, Ryszard Morasiewicz, Piotr Małdyk, Paweł |
author_facet | Szelerski, Łukasz Żarek, Sławomir Górski, Radosław Mochocki, Karol Górski, Ryszard Morasiewicz, Piotr Małdyk, Paweł |
author_sort | Szelerski, Łukasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study compared surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective comparative study, 75 patients were treated with the Ilizarov technique for aseptic posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia in the period 2000–2016. We compared them with the 51 patients from the control group, treated for tibial bone union disturbances using internal osteosynthesis methods, i.e., internal-fixation plates and intramedullary nails. The study groups were compared in terms of the rates of union, time to union, and the baseline-to-postoperative difference in lower leg deformity. RESULTS: Union rate in the Ilizarov group was 100% and the control group was 51.92% (p < 0.001). The median time to union suggests that patients from the Ilizarov group needed a shorter time to achieve bone union (203.00 days vs. 271.00 days) (p = 0.091). The effect size in the Ilizarov group was larger both in terms of reducing both limb deformity and shortening (it is worth noting, however, that the Ilizarov treatment was used in patients with higher baseline values of both these parameters). We observed no significant difference in terms of time to union between the group of patients with at least one risk factor for disturbance in fracture healing and the group with no risk factors. The following risk factors were considered: diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid therapy, smoking, alcohol dependence, and advanced lower-extremity vascular disease (p = 0.827). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated a high effectiveness of the Ilizarov method in the treatment of aseptic posttraumatic pseudarthroses of the tibia. The Ilizarov method seems to be worth considering in all cases where either the patient or the nature of injury is associated with additional risk factors and whenever there is a need for leg deformity correction or leg elongation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7236123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72361232020-05-27 Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis Szelerski, Łukasz Żarek, Sławomir Górski, Radosław Mochocki, Karol Górski, Ryszard Morasiewicz, Piotr Małdyk, Paweł J Orthop Surg Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: This study compared surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective comparative study, 75 patients were treated with the Ilizarov technique for aseptic posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia in the period 2000–2016. We compared them with the 51 patients from the control group, treated for tibial bone union disturbances using internal osteosynthesis methods, i.e., internal-fixation plates and intramedullary nails. The study groups were compared in terms of the rates of union, time to union, and the baseline-to-postoperative difference in lower leg deformity. RESULTS: Union rate in the Ilizarov group was 100% and the control group was 51.92% (p < 0.001). The median time to union suggests that patients from the Ilizarov group needed a shorter time to achieve bone union (203.00 days vs. 271.00 days) (p = 0.091). The effect size in the Ilizarov group was larger both in terms of reducing both limb deformity and shortening (it is worth noting, however, that the Ilizarov treatment was used in patients with higher baseline values of both these parameters). We observed no significant difference in terms of time to union between the group of patients with at least one risk factor for disturbance in fracture healing and the group with no risk factors. The following risk factors were considered: diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid therapy, smoking, alcohol dependence, and advanced lower-extremity vascular disease (p = 0.827). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated a high effectiveness of the Ilizarov method in the treatment of aseptic posttraumatic pseudarthroses of the tibia. The Ilizarov method seems to be worth considering in all cases where either the patient or the nature of injury is associated with additional risk factors and whenever there is a need for leg deformity correction or leg elongation. BioMed Central 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7236123/ /pubmed/32430044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01697-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Szelerski, Łukasz Żarek, Sławomir Górski, Radosław Mochocki, Karol Górski, Ryszard Morasiewicz, Piotr Małdyk, Paweł Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis |
title | Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis |
title_full | Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis |
title_fullStr | Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis |
title_short | Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis |
title_sort | surgical treatment outcomes of the ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia—a retrospective comparative analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01697-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szelerskiłukasz surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis AT zareksławomir surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis AT gorskiradosław surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis AT mochockikarol surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis AT gorskiryszard surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis AT morasiewiczpiotr surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis AT małdykpaweł surgicaltreatmentoutcomesoftheilizarovandinternalosteosynthesismethodsinposttraumaticpseudarthrosisofthetibiaaretrospectivecomparativeanalysis |