Cargando…

How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study

BACKGROUND: Remote Patient Monitoring Systems (RPMS) based on e-health, Nurse Navigators (NNs) and patient engagement can improve patient follow-up and have a positive impact on quality of care (by limiting adverse events) and costs (by reducing readmissions). However, the extent of this impact depe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrua, Marie, Minvielle, Etienne, Fourcade, Aude, Lalloué, Benoît, Sicotte, Claude, Di Palma, Mario, Mir, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05293-4
_version_ 1783536126015832064
author Ferrua, Marie
Minvielle, Etienne
Fourcade, Aude
Lalloué, Benoît
Sicotte, Claude
Di Palma, Mario
Mir, Olivier
author_facet Ferrua, Marie
Minvielle, Etienne
Fourcade, Aude
Lalloué, Benoît
Sicotte, Claude
Di Palma, Mario
Mir, Olivier
author_sort Ferrua, Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Remote Patient Monitoring Systems (RPMS) based on e-health, Nurse Navigators (NNs) and patient engagement can improve patient follow-up and have a positive impact on quality of care (by limiting adverse events) and costs (by reducing readmissions). However, the extent of this impact depends on effective implementation which is often restricted. This is partly due to the lack of attention paid to the RPMS design phase prior to implementation. The content of the RPMS can be carefully designed at this stage and various obstacles anticipated. Our aim was to report on an RPMS design case to provide insights into the methodology required in order to manage this phase. METHODS: This study was carried out at Gustave Roussy, a comprehensive cancer centre, in France. A multidisciplinary team coordinated the CAPRI RPMS design process (2013–2015) that later produced positive outcomes. Data were collected during eight studies conducted according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework. This project was approved by the French National Data Protection Authorities. RESULTS: Based on the study results, the multidisciplinary team defined strategies for resolving obstacles prior to the implementation of CAPRI. Consequently, the final CAPRI design includes a web app with two interfaces (patient and health care professionals) and two NNs. The NNs provide regular follow-up via telephone or email to manage patients’ symptoms and toxicity, treatment compliance and care packages. Patients contact the NNs via a secure messaging system. Eighty clinical decision support tools enable NNs to prioritise and decide on the course of action to be taken. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the RPMS design process and, more generally, that of any complex intervention programme, is an important phase that requires a sound methodological basis. This study is also consistent with the notion that an RPMS is more than a technological innovation. This is indeed an organizational innovation, and principles identified during the design phase can help in the effective use of a RPMS (e.g. locating NNs if possible within the care organization; recruiting NNs with clinical and managerial skills; defining algorithms for clinical decision support tools for assessment, but also for patient decision and orientation).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7236289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72362892020-05-27 How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study Ferrua, Marie Minvielle, Etienne Fourcade, Aude Lalloué, Benoît Sicotte, Claude Di Palma, Mario Mir, Olivier BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Remote Patient Monitoring Systems (RPMS) based on e-health, Nurse Navigators (NNs) and patient engagement can improve patient follow-up and have a positive impact on quality of care (by limiting adverse events) and costs (by reducing readmissions). However, the extent of this impact depends on effective implementation which is often restricted. This is partly due to the lack of attention paid to the RPMS design phase prior to implementation. The content of the RPMS can be carefully designed at this stage and various obstacles anticipated. Our aim was to report on an RPMS design case to provide insights into the methodology required in order to manage this phase. METHODS: This study was carried out at Gustave Roussy, a comprehensive cancer centre, in France. A multidisciplinary team coordinated the CAPRI RPMS design process (2013–2015) that later produced positive outcomes. Data were collected during eight studies conducted according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework. This project was approved by the French National Data Protection Authorities. RESULTS: Based on the study results, the multidisciplinary team defined strategies for resolving obstacles prior to the implementation of CAPRI. Consequently, the final CAPRI design includes a web app with two interfaces (patient and health care professionals) and two NNs. The NNs provide regular follow-up via telephone or email to manage patients’ symptoms and toxicity, treatment compliance and care packages. Patients contact the NNs via a secure messaging system. Eighty clinical decision support tools enable NNs to prioritise and decide on the course of action to be taken. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the RPMS design process and, more generally, that of any complex intervention programme, is an important phase that requires a sound methodological basis. This study is also consistent with the notion that an RPMS is more than a technological innovation. This is indeed an organizational innovation, and principles identified during the design phase can help in the effective use of a RPMS (e.g. locating NNs if possible within the care organization; recruiting NNs with clinical and managerial skills; defining algorithms for clinical decision support tools for assessment, but also for patient decision and orientation). BioMed Central 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7236289/ /pubmed/32429987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05293-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferrua, Marie
Minvielle, Etienne
Fourcade, Aude
Lalloué, Benoît
Sicotte, Claude
Di Palma, Mario
Mir, Olivier
How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study
title How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study
title_full How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study
title_fullStr How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study
title_full_unstemmed How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study
title_short How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study
title_sort how to design a remote patient monitoring system? a french case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05293-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ferruamarie howtodesignaremotepatientmonitoringsystemafrenchcasestudy
AT minvielleetienne howtodesignaremotepatientmonitoringsystemafrenchcasestudy
AT fourcadeaude howtodesignaremotepatientmonitoringsystemafrenchcasestudy
AT lallouebenoit howtodesignaremotepatientmonitoringsystemafrenchcasestudy
AT sicotteclaude howtodesignaremotepatientmonitoringsystemafrenchcasestudy
AT dipalmamario howtodesignaremotepatientmonitoringsystemafrenchcasestudy
AT mirolivier howtodesignaremotepatientmonitoringsystemafrenchcasestudy