Cargando…
Identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the Group Priority Sort technique
BACKGROUND: Patient engagement strategies in health service delivery have become more common in recent years. However, many healthcare organizations are challenged in identifying the best methods to engage patients in health information technology (IT) initiatives. Engaging with important stakeholde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00203-8 |
_version_ | 1783536133510004736 |
---|---|
author | Lo, Brian Zhang, Timothy Leung, Kevin Mehta, Rohan Kuziemsky, Craig Booth, Richard G. Chyjek, Anna Rossetti, Sarah Collins McLean, Drew Borycki, Elizabeth McLay, David Noble, Justin Carter, Shawn Strudwick, Gillian |
author_facet | Lo, Brian Zhang, Timothy Leung, Kevin Mehta, Rohan Kuziemsky, Craig Booth, Richard G. Chyjek, Anna Rossetti, Sarah Collins McLean, Drew Borycki, Elizabeth McLay, David Noble, Justin Carter, Shawn Strudwick, Gillian |
author_sort | Lo, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient engagement strategies in health service delivery have become more common in recent years. However, many healthcare organizations are challenged in identifying the best methods to engage patients in health information technology (IT) initiatives. Engaging with important stakeholders to identify effective opportunities can inform the development of a resource that addresses this issue and supports organizations in their endeavors. The purpose of this paper is to share our experience and lessons learned from applying a novel consensus-building technique in order to identify key elements for effective patient engagement in health IT initiatives. This will be done through a case study approach. METHODS: Patients, family members of patients, health professionals, researchers, students, vendor representatives and individuals who work in health IT roles in health organizations were engaged through a one-day symposium in Toronto, Canada in September, 2018. During the symposium, the Group Priority Sort technique was used to obtain structured feedback from symposium attendees in the context of small group discussions. Descriptive statistics and a content analysis were undertaken to analyze the data collected through the Group Priority Sort as well as participant feedback following the symposium. RESULTS: A total of 37 participants attended the symposium from a variety of settings and organizations. Using the Group Priority Sort technique, 30 topics were classified by priority to be included in a future resource. Participant feedback pertaining to the symposium and research methods was largely positive. Several areas of improvement, such as clarity of items, were identified from this case study. CONCLUSIONS: The Group Priority Sort technique was an efficient method for obtaining valuable suggestions from a diverse group of stakeholders, including patients and family members. The specific priorities and feedback obtained from the symposium will be incorporated into a resource for healthcare organizations to aid them in engaging patients in health IT initiatives. Additionally, five important considerations were identified when conducting future work with the Group Priority Sort technique and are outlined in this paper. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7236324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72363242020-05-29 Identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the Group Priority Sort technique Lo, Brian Zhang, Timothy Leung, Kevin Mehta, Rohan Kuziemsky, Craig Booth, Richard G. Chyjek, Anna Rossetti, Sarah Collins McLean, Drew Borycki, Elizabeth McLay, David Noble, Justin Carter, Shawn Strudwick, Gillian Res Involv Engagem Methodology BACKGROUND: Patient engagement strategies in health service delivery have become more common in recent years. However, many healthcare organizations are challenged in identifying the best methods to engage patients in health information technology (IT) initiatives. Engaging with important stakeholders to identify effective opportunities can inform the development of a resource that addresses this issue and supports organizations in their endeavors. The purpose of this paper is to share our experience and lessons learned from applying a novel consensus-building technique in order to identify key elements for effective patient engagement in health IT initiatives. This will be done through a case study approach. METHODS: Patients, family members of patients, health professionals, researchers, students, vendor representatives and individuals who work in health IT roles in health organizations were engaged through a one-day symposium in Toronto, Canada in September, 2018. During the symposium, the Group Priority Sort technique was used to obtain structured feedback from symposium attendees in the context of small group discussions. Descriptive statistics and a content analysis were undertaken to analyze the data collected through the Group Priority Sort as well as participant feedback following the symposium. RESULTS: A total of 37 participants attended the symposium from a variety of settings and organizations. Using the Group Priority Sort technique, 30 topics were classified by priority to be included in a future resource. Participant feedback pertaining to the symposium and research methods was largely positive. Several areas of improvement, such as clarity of items, were identified from this case study. CONCLUSIONS: The Group Priority Sort technique was an efficient method for obtaining valuable suggestions from a diverse group of stakeholders, including patients and family members. The specific priorities and feedback obtained from the symposium will be incorporated into a resource for healthcare organizations to aid them in engaging patients in health IT initiatives. Additionally, five important considerations were identified when conducting future work with the Group Priority Sort technique and are outlined in this paper. BioMed Central 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7236324/ /pubmed/32477591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00203-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Lo, Brian Zhang, Timothy Leung, Kevin Mehta, Rohan Kuziemsky, Craig Booth, Richard G. Chyjek, Anna Rossetti, Sarah Collins McLean, Drew Borycki, Elizabeth McLay, David Noble, Justin Carter, Shawn Strudwick, Gillian Identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the Group Priority Sort technique |
title | Identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the Group Priority Sort technique |
title_full | Identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the Group Priority Sort technique |
title_fullStr | Identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the Group Priority Sort technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the Group Priority Sort technique |
title_short | Identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the Group Priority Sort technique |
title_sort | identifying best approaches for engaging patients and family members in health informatics initiatives: a case study of the group priority sort technique |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00203-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lobrian identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT zhangtimothy identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT leungkevin identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT mehtarohan identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT kuziemskycraig identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT boothrichardg identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT chyjekanna identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT rossettisarahcollins identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT mcleandrew identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT boryckielizabeth identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT mclaydavid identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT noblejustin identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT cartershawn identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique AT strudwickgillian identifyingbestapproachesforengagingpatientsandfamilymembersinhealthinformaticsinitiativesacasestudyofthegroupprioritysorttechnique |