Cargando…

A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual

BACKGROUND: Patient participation in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal. A challenge to capturing physicians’ insights about trials has been low response to surveys. We conducted a study using varying combinations of mail and email to recruit a nationally representative sample of medical, surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Caitlin C., Craddock Lee, Simon J., Geiger, Ann M., Cox, John V., Ahn, Chul, Nair, Rasmi, Gerber, David E., Halm, Ethan A., McCallister, Katharine, Skinner, Celette Sugg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x
_version_ 1783536136707112960
author Murphy, Caitlin C.
Craddock Lee, Simon J.
Geiger, Ann M.
Cox, John V.
Ahn, Chul
Nair, Rasmi
Gerber, David E.
Halm, Ethan A.
McCallister, Katharine
Skinner, Celette Sugg
author_facet Murphy, Caitlin C.
Craddock Lee, Simon J.
Geiger, Ann M.
Cox, John V.
Ahn, Chul
Nair, Rasmi
Gerber, David E.
Halm, Ethan A.
McCallister, Katharine
Skinner, Celette Sugg
author_sort Murphy, Caitlin C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient participation in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal. A challenge to capturing physicians’ insights about trials has been low response to surveys. We conducted a study using varying combinations of mail and email to recruit a nationally representative sample of medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists to complete a survey on trial accrual. METHODS: We randomly assigned eligible physicians identified from the American Medical Association MasterFile (n = 13,251) to mail- or email-based recruitment strategies. Mail-based recruitment included a survey packet with: (1) cover letter describing the survey and inviting participation; (2) paper copy of the survey and postage-paid return envelope; and (3) a web link for completing the survey online. Email-based recruitment included an e-mail describing the survey and inviting participation, along with the web link to the survey, and a reminder postcard 2 weeks later. RESULTS: Response was higher for mail-based (11.8, 95% CI 11.0–12.6%) vs. email-based (4.5, 95% CI 4.0–5.0%) recruitment. In email-based recruitment, only one-quarter of recipients opened the email, and even fewer clicked on the link to complete the survey. Most physicians in mail-based recruitment responded after the first invitation (362 of 770 responders, 47.0%). A higher proportion of responders vs. non-responders were young (ages 25–44 years), men, and radiation or surgical (vs. medical) oncologists. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians assigned to mail-based recruitment actually completed the survey online via the link provided in the cover letter, and those in email-based recruitment did not respond until they received a reminder postcard by mail. Providing the option to return a paper survey or complete it online may have further increased participation in the mail-based group, and future studies should examine how combinations of delivery mode and return options affect physicians’ response to surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7236338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72363382020-05-29 A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual Murphy, Caitlin C. Craddock Lee, Simon J. Geiger, Ann M. Cox, John V. Ahn, Chul Nair, Rasmi Gerber, David E. Halm, Ethan A. McCallister, Katharine Skinner, Celette Sugg BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient participation in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal. A challenge to capturing physicians’ insights about trials has been low response to surveys. We conducted a study using varying combinations of mail and email to recruit a nationally representative sample of medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists to complete a survey on trial accrual. METHODS: We randomly assigned eligible physicians identified from the American Medical Association MasterFile (n = 13,251) to mail- or email-based recruitment strategies. Mail-based recruitment included a survey packet with: (1) cover letter describing the survey and inviting participation; (2) paper copy of the survey and postage-paid return envelope; and (3) a web link for completing the survey online. Email-based recruitment included an e-mail describing the survey and inviting participation, along with the web link to the survey, and a reminder postcard 2 weeks later. RESULTS: Response was higher for mail-based (11.8, 95% CI 11.0–12.6%) vs. email-based (4.5, 95% CI 4.0–5.0%) recruitment. In email-based recruitment, only one-quarter of recipients opened the email, and even fewer clicked on the link to complete the survey. Most physicians in mail-based recruitment responded after the first invitation (362 of 770 responders, 47.0%). A higher proportion of responders vs. non-responders were young (ages 25–44 years), men, and radiation or surgical (vs. medical) oncologists. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians assigned to mail-based recruitment actually completed the survey online via the link provided in the cover letter, and those in email-based recruitment did not respond until they received a reminder postcard by mail. Providing the option to return a paper survey or complete it online may have further increased participation in the mail-based group, and future studies should examine how combinations of delivery mode and return options affect physicians’ response to surveys. BioMed Central 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7236338/ /pubmed/32429848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murphy, Caitlin C.
Craddock Lee, Simon J.
Geiger, Ann M.
Cox, John V.
Ahn, Chul
Nair, Rasmi
Gerber, David E.
Halm, Ethan A.
McCallister, Katharine
Skinner, Celette Sugg
A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual
title A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual
title_full A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual
title_fullStr A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual
title_full_unstemmed A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual
title_short A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual
title_sort randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x
work_keys_str_mv AT murphycaitlinc arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT craddockleesimonj arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT geigerannm arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT coxjohnv arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT ahnchul arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT nairrasmi arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT gerberdavide arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT halmethana arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT mccallisterkatharine arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT skinnercelettesugg arandomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT murphycaitlinc randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT craddockleesimonj randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT geigerannm randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT coxjohnv randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT ahnchul randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT nairrasmi randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT gerberdavide randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT halmethana randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT mccallisterkatharine randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual
AT skinnercelettesugg randomizedtrialofmailandemailrecruitmentstrategiesforaphysiciansurveyonclinicaltrialaccrual