Cargando…

Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II–III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q-codeletion are oncogenetic alterations with a positive prognostic value for diffuse gliomas, especially grade II and III. Some studies have suggested differences in biological behavior as reflected by radiological characteristics. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Lent, Djuno I, van Baarsen, Kirsten M, Snijders, Tom J, Robe, Pierre A J T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa044
_version_ 1783536147140444160
author van Lent, Djuno I
van Baarsen, Kirsten M
Snijders, Tom J
Robe, Pierre A J T
author_facet van Lent, Djuno I
van Baarsen, Kirsten M
Snijders, Tom J
Robe, Pierre A J T
author_sort van Lent, Djuno I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q-codeletion are oncogenetic alterations with a positive prognostic value for diffuse gliomas, especially grade II and III. Some studies have suggested differences in biological behavior as reflected by radiological characteristics. In this paper, the literature regarding radiological characteristics in grade II and III glioma subtypes was systematically evaluated and a meta-analysis was performed. METHODS: Studies that addressed the relationship between conventional radiological characteristics and IDH mutations and/or 1p/19q-codeletions in newly diagnosed, grade II and III gliomas of adult patients were included. The “3-group analysis” compared radiological characteristics between the WHO 2016 glioma subtypes (IDH-mutant astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma), and the “2-group analysis” compared radiological characteristics between 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas and 1p/19q-intact gliomas. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (3-group analysis: 670 cases, 2-group analysis: 1042 cases) were included. IDH-mutated astrocytomas showed more often sharp borders and less frequently contrast enhancement compared to IDH-wildtype astrocytomas. 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas had less frequently sharp borders, but showed a heterogeneous aspect, calcification, cysts, and edema more frequently. For the 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas, a sensitivity of 96% was found for heterogeneity and a specificity of 88.1% for calcification. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in conventional radiological characteristics exist between the WHO 2016 glioma subtypes, which may reflect differences in biological behavior. However, the diagnostic value of the independent radiological characteristics is insufficient to reliably predict the molecular genetic subtype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7236393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72363932020-07-07 Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II–III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis van Lent, Djuno I van Baarsen, Kirsten M Snijders, Tom J Robe, Pierre A J T Neurooncol Adv Review BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q-codeletion are oncogenetic alterations with a positive prognostic value for diffuse gliomas, especially grade II and III. Some studies have suggested differences in biological behavior as reflected by radiological characteristics. In this paper, the literature regarding radiological characteristics in grade II and III glioma subtypes was systematically evaluated and a meta-analysis was performed. METHODS: Studies that addressed the relationship between conventional radiological characteristics and IDH mutations and/or 1p/19q-codeletions in newly diagnosed, grade II and III gliomas of adult patients were included. The “3-group analysis” compared radiological characteristics between the WHO 2016 glioma subtypes (IDH-mutant astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma), and the “2-group analysis” compared radiological characteristics between 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas and 1p/19q-intact gliomas. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (3-group analysis: 670 cases, 2-group analysis: 1042 cases) were included. IDH-mutated astrocytomas showed more often sharp borders and less frequently contrast enhancement compared to IDH-wildtype astrocytomas. 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas had less frequently sharp borders, but showed a heterogeneous aspect, calcification, cysts, and edema more frequently. For the 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas, a sensitivity of 96% was found for heterogeneity and a specificity of 88.1% for calcification. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in conventional radiological characteristics exist between the WHO 2016 glioma subtypes, which may reflect differences in biological behavior. However, the diagnostic value of the independent radiological characteristics is insufficient to reliably predict the molecular genetic subtype. Oxford University Press 2020-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7236393/ /pubmed/32642698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa044 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Review
van Lent, Djuno I
van Baarsen, Kirsten M
Snijders, Tom J
Robe, Pierre A J T
Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II–III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II–III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II–III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II–III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II–III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II–III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort radiological differences between subtypes of who 2016 grade ii–iii gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa044
work_keys_str_mv AT vanlentdjunoi radiologicaldifferencesbetweensubtypesofwho2016gradeiiiiigliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanbaarsenkirstenm radiologicaldifferencesbetweensubtypesofwho2016gradeiiiiigliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT snijderstomj radiologicaldifferencesbetweensubtypesofwho2016gradeiiiiigliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robepierreajt radiologicaldifferencesbetweensubtypesofwho2016gradeiiiiigliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis