Cargando…

Frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with SMS

BACKGROUND: As technology is advancing, so are the possibilities for new data collection methods in research, potentially improving data quality and validity of the results. In Sweden, a system using frequent repeated data collection using text messages, SMS Track, has been used in clinical research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Axén, I., Jensen, I., Butler Forslund, E., Grahn, B., Jørgensen, V., Opava, C. H., Bodin, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01013-y
_version_ 1783536156222160896
author Axén, I.
Jensen, I.
Butler Forslund, E.
Grahn, B.
Jørgensen, V.
Opava, C. H.
Bodin, L.
author_facet Axén, I.
Jensen, I.
Butler Forslund, E.
Grahn, B.
Jørgensen, V.
Opava, C. H.
Bodin, L.
author_sort Axén, I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As technology is advancing, so are the possibilities for new data collection methods in research, potentially improving data quality and validity of the results. In Sweden, a system using frequent repeated data collection using text messages, SMS Track, has been used in clinical research for more than a decade. In this paper, compliance with repeated text message questions was examined across five different studies, i.e. if compliance was 1: associated with study-specific factors (age or gender of the subjects, the condition, its’ severity or course, i.e. improvement, relapse or steady state) and/or. 2: associated with the methodology itself (the question being asked, the frequency and number of questions, duration of data collection, initial compliance or the management of the system). METHODS: Descriptive comparisons were done across five studies. Three studies were collecting weekly responses over at least 52 weeks (“Weekly studies”) and were used to investigate the effect of age, sex and pain severity on compliance, the effect of early compliance for late compliance, and finally the early occurrence of two successive weeks with non-compliance. RESULT: Compliance was excellent across all five studies, and only influenced somewhat by age, sex and pain-level. The factor “study” remained significant in the final model thus the observed differences may be a result of the conditions studied but does not seem to be attributable to severity or development of these conditions. Number and frequency of questions did not influence compliance, nor did study duration. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance was excellent in the included studies and was not affected by population factors. However, differences in compliance were observed that cannot be easily explained and warrant further investigation. In particular, the nature of the variables or the management of the study are potential areas for further investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7236444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72364442020-05-29 Frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with SMS Axén, I. Jensen, I. Butler Forslund, E. Grahn, B. Jørgensen, V. Opava, C. H. Bodin, L. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: As technology is advancing, so are the possibilities for new data collection methods in research, potentially improving data quality and validity of the results. In Sweden, a system using frequent repeated data collection using text messages, SMS Track, has been used in clinical research for more than a decade. In this paper, compliance with repeated text message questions was examined across five different studies, i.e. if compliance was 1: associated with study-specific factors (age or gender of the subjects, the condition, its’ severity or course, i.e. improvement, relapse or steady state) and/or. 2: associated with the methodology itself (the question being asked, the frequency and number of questions, duration of data collection, initial compliance or the management of the system). METHODS: Descriptive comparisons were done across five studies. Three studies were collecting weekly responses over at least 52 weeks (“Weekly studies”) and were used to investigate the effect of age, sex and pain severity on compliance, the effect of early compliance for late compliance, and finally the early occurrence of two successive weeks with non-compliance. RESULT: Compliance was excellent across all five studies, and only influenced somewhat by age, sex and pain-level. The factor “study” remained significant in the final model thus the observed differences may be a result of the conditions studied but does not seem to be attributable to severity or development of these conditions. Number and frequency of questions did not influence compliance, nor did study duration. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance was excellent in the included studies and was not affected by population factors. However, differences in compliance were observed that cannot be easily explained and warrant further investigation. In particular, the nature of the variables or the management of the study are potential areas for further investigations. BioMed Central 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7236444/ /pubmed/32429834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01013-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Axén, I.
Jensen, I.
Butler Forslund, E.
Grahn, B.
Jørgensen, V.
Opava, C. H.
Bodin, L.
Frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with SMS
title Frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with SMS
title_full Frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with SMS
title_fullStr Frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with SMS
title_full_unstemmed Frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with SMS
title_short Frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with SMS
title_sort frequently repeated measurements -our experience of collecting data with sms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01013-y
work_keys_str_mv AT axeni frequentlyrepeatedmeasurementsourexperienceofcollectingdatawithsms
AT jenseni frequentlyrepeatedmeasurementsourexperienceofcollectingdatawithsms
AT butlerforslunde frequentlyrepeatedmeasurementsourexperienceofcollectingdatawithsms
AT grahnb frequentlyrepeatedmeasurementsourexperienceofcollectingdatawithsms
AT jørgensenv frequentlyrepeatedmeasurementsourexperienceofcollectingdatawithsms
AT opavach frequentlyrepeatedmeasurementsourexperienceofcollectingdatawithsms
AT bodinl frequentlyrepeatedmeasurementsourexperienceofcollectingdatawithsms