Cargando…

Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the protocol adopted during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic to maintain elective activity in a vascular surgery unit while minimising the risk of contamination to both patients and physicians, and the impact of this activity on the intensive care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pini, Rodolfo, Faggioli, Gianluca, Vacirca, Andrea, Gallitto, Enrico, Mascoli, Chiara, Attard, Luciano, Viale, Pierluigi, Gargiulo, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.024
_version_ 1783536197197365248
author Pini, Rodolfo
Faggioli, Gianluca
Vacirca, Andrea
Gallitto, Enrico
Mascoli, Chiara
Attard, Luciano
Viale, Pierluigi
Gargiulo, Mauro
author_facet Pini, Rodolfo
Faggioli, Gianluca
Vacirca, Andrea
Gallitto, Enrico
Mascoli, Chiara
Attard, Luciano
Viale, Pierluigi
Gargiulo, Mauro
author_sort Pini, Rodolfo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the protocol adopted during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic to maintain elective activity in a vascular surgery unit while minimising the risk of contamination to both patients and physicians, and the impact of this activity on the intensive care (IC) resources. METHODS: The activity of a vascular surgery unit was analysed from 8 March to 8 April 2020. Surgical activity was maintained only for acute or elective procedures obeying priority criteria. The preventive screening protocol consisted of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) for all patients and physicians with symptoms and for unprotected contact infected cases, and serological physician evaluations every 15 days. Patients treated in the acute setting were considered theoretically infected and the necessary protective devices were used. The number of patients and the possible infection of physicians were evaluated. The number and type of interventions and the need for post-operative IC during this period were compared with those in the same periods in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one interventions were performed, of which 34 (23%) were acute/emergency. The total number of interventions was similar to those performed in the same periods in 2019 and 2018: 150 (33, of which 22% acute/emergency) and 117 (29, 25% acute/emergency), respectively. IC was necessary after 6% (17% in 2019 and 20% in 2018) of elective operations and 33% (11) of acute/emergency interventions. None of the patients treated electively were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection during hospitalisation. Of the 34 patients treated in acute/emergency interventions, five (15%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. It was necessary to screen 14 (47%) vascular surgeons with NPS after contact with infected colleagues, but none for unprotected contact with patients; all were found to be negative on NPS and serological evaluation. CONCLUSION: A dedicated protocol allowed maintenance of regular elective vascular surgery activity during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no contamination of patients or physicians and minimal need for IC resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7236703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72367032020-05-19 Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Pini, Rodolfo Faggioli, Gianluca Vacirca, Andrea Gallitto, Enrico Mascoli, Chiara Attard, Luciano Viale, Pierluigi Gargiulo, Mauro Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the protocol adopted during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic to maintain elective activity in a vascular surgery unit while minimising the risk of contamination to both patients and physicians, and the impact of this activity on the intensive care (IC) resources. METHODS: The activity of a vascular surgery unit was analysed from 8 March to 8 April 2020. Surgical activity was maintained only for acute or elective procedures obeying priority criteria. The preventive screening protocol consisted of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) for all patients and physicians with symptoms and for unprotected contact infected cases, and serological physician evaluations every 15 days. Patients treated in the acute setting were considered theoretically infected and the necessary protective devices were used. The number of patients and the possible infection of physicians were evaluated. The number and type of interventions and the need for post-operative IC during this period were compared with those in the same periods in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one interventions were performed, of which 34 (23%) were acute/emergency. The total number of interventions was similar to those performed in the same periods in 2019 and 2018: 150 (33, of which 22% acute/emergency) and 117 (29, 25% acute/emergency), respectively. IC was necessary after 6% (17% in 2019 and 20% in 2018) of elective operations and 33% (11) of acute/emergency interventions. None of the patients treated electively were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection during hospitalisation. Of the 34 patients treated in acute/emergency interventions, five (15%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. It was necessary to screen 14 (47%) vascular surgeons with NPS after contact with infected colleagues, but none for unprotected contact with patients; all were found to be negative on NPS and serological evaluation. CONCLUSION: A dedicated protocol allowed maintenance of regular elective vascular surgery activity during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no contamination of patients or physicians and minimal need for IC resources. European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-07 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7236703/ /pubmed/32499169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.024 Text en © 2020 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Pini, Rodolfo
Faggioli, Gianluca
Vacirca, Andrea
Gallitto, Enrico
Mascoli, Chiara
Attard, Luciano
Viale, Pierluigi
Gargiulo, Mauro
Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
title Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
title_full Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
title_fullStr Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
title_full_unstemmed Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
title_short Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
title_sort is it possible to safely maintain a regular vascular practice during the covid-19 pandemic?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.024
work_keys_str_mv AT pinirodolfo isitpossibletosafelymaintainaregularvascularpracticeduringthecovid19pandemic
AT faggioligianluca isitpossibletosafelymaintainaregularvascularpracticeduringthecovid19pandemic
AT vacircaandrea isitpossibletosafelymaintainaregularvascularpracticeduringthecovid19pandemic
AT gallittoenrico isitpossibletosafelymaintainaregularvascularpracticeduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mascolichiara isitpossibletosafelymaintainaregularvascularpracticeduringthecovid19pandemic
AT attardluciano isitpossibletosafelymaintainaregularvascularpracticeduringthecovid19pandemic
AT vialepierluigi isitpossibletosafelymaintainaregularvascularpracticeduringthecovid19pandemic
AT gargiulomauro isitpossibletosafelymaintainaregularvascularpracticeduringthecovid19pandemic