Cargando…
γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not
BACKGROUND: γ-Secretase is a multiprotein protease that cleaves amyloid protein precursor (APP) and other type I transmembrane proteins. It has two catalytic subunits, presenilins 1 and 2 (PS1 and 2). In our previous report, we observed subtle differences in PS1- and PS2-mediated cleavages of select...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00622-5 |
_version_ | 1783536231320125440 |
---|---|
author | Lessard, Christian B. Rodriguez, Edgardo Ladd, Thomas B. Minter, Lisa M. Osborne, Barbara A. Miele, Lucio Golde, Todd E. Ran, Yong |
author_facet | Lessard, Christian B. Rodriguez, Edgardo Ladd, Thomas B. Minter, Lisa M. Osborne, Barbara A. Miele, Lucio Golde, Todd E. Ran, Yong |
author_sort | Lessard, Christian B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: γ-Secretase is a multiprotein protease that cleaves amyloid protein precursor (APP) and other type I transmembrane proteins. It has two catalytic subunits, presenilins 1 and 2 (PS1 and 2). In our previous report, we observed subtle differences in PS1- and PS2-mediated cleavages of select substrates and slightly different potencies of PS1 versus PS2 inhibition for select γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) on various substrates. In this study, we investigated whether γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) and inverse γ-secretase modulators (iGSMs) modulate γ-secretase processivity using multiple different substrates. We next used HEK 293T cell lines in which PSEN1 or PSEN2 was selectively knocked out to investigate processivity and response to GSMs and iGSMs. METHODS: For cell-free γ-secretase cleavage assay, recombinant substrates were incubated with CHAPSO-solubilized CHO or HEK 293T cell membrane with GSMs or iGSMs in suitable buffer. For cell-based assay, cDNA encoding substrates were transfected into HEK 293T cells. Cells were then treated with GSMs or iGSMs, and conditioned media were collected. Aβ and Aβ-like peptide production from cell-free and cell-based assay were measured by ELISA and mass spectrometry. RESULT: These studies demonstrated that GSMs are highly selective for effects on APP, whereas iGSMs have a more promiscuous effect on many substrates. Surprisingly, iGSMs actually appear to act as like GSIs on select substrates. The data with PSEN1 or PSEN2 knocked out HEK 293T reveal that PS1 has higher processivity and response to GSMs than PS2, but PS2 has higher response to iGSM. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these data indicate that GSMs are likely to have limited target-based toxicity. In addition, they show that iGSMs may act as substrate-selective GSIs providing a potential new route to identify leads for substrate-selective inhibitors of certain γ-secretase-mediated signaling events. With growing concerns that long-term β-secretase inhibitor is limited by target-based toxicities, such data supports continued development of GSMs as AD prophylactics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7236921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72369212020-05-27 γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not Lessard, Christian B. Rodriguez, Edgardo Ladd, Thomas B. Minter, Lisa M. Osborne, Barbara A. Miele, Lucio Golde, Todd E. Ran, Yong Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: γ-Secretase is a multiprotein protease that cleaves amyloid protein precursor (APP) and other type I transmembrane proteins. It has two catalytic subunits, presenilins 1 and 2 (PS1 and 2). In our previous report, we observed subtle differences in PS1- and PS2-mediated cleavages of select substrates and slightly different potencies of PS1 versus PS2 inhibition for select γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) on various substrates. In this study, we investigated whether γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) and inverse γ-secretase modulators (iGSMs) modulate γ-secretase processivity using multiple different substrates. We next used HEK 293T cell lines in which PSEN1 or PSEN2 was selectively knocked out to investigate processivity and response to GSMs and iGSMs. METHODS: For cell-free γ-secretase cleavage assay, recombinant substrates were incubated with CHAPSO-solubilized CHO or HEK 293T cell membrane with GSMs or iGSMs in suitable buffer. For cell-based assay, cDNA encoding substrates were transfected into HEK 293T cells. Cells were then treated with GSMs or iGSMs, and conditioned media were collected. Aβ and Aβ-like peptide production from cell-free and cell-based assay were measured by ELISA and mass spectrometry. RESULT: These studies demonstrated that GSMs are highly selective for effects on APP, whereas iGSMs have a more promiscuous effect on many substrates. Surprisingly, iGSMs actually appear to act as like GSIs on select substrates. The data with PSEN1 or PSEN2 knocked out HEK 293T reveal that PS1 has higher processivity and response to GSMs than PS2, but PS2 has higher response to iGSM. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these data indicate that GSMs are likely to have limited target-based toxicity. In addition, they show that iGSMs may act as substrate-selective GSIs providing a potential new route to identify leads for substrate-selective inhibitors of certain γ-secretase-mediated signaling events. With growing concerns that long-term β-secretase inhibitor is limited by target-based toxicities, such data supports continued development of GSMs as AD prophylactics. BioMed Central 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7236921/ /pubmed/32430033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00622-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lessard, Christian B. Rodriguez, Edgardo Ladd, Thomas B. Minter, Lisa M. Osborne, Barbara A. Miele, Lucio Golde, Todd E. Ran, Yong γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not |
title | γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not |
title_full | γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not |
title_fullStr | γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not |
title_full_unstemmed | γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not |
title_short | γ-Secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of APP cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not |
title_sort | γ-secretase modulators exhibit selectivity for modulation of app cleavage but inverse γ-secretase modulators do not |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00622-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lessardchristianb gsecretasemodulatorsexhibitselectivityformodulationofappcleavagebutinversegsecretasemodulatorsdonot AT rodriguezedgardo gsecretasemodulatorsexhibitselectivityformodulationofappcleavagebutinversegsecretasemodulatorsdonot AT laddthomasb gsecretasemodulatorsexhibitselectivityformodulationofappcleavagebutinversegsecretasemodulatorsdonot AT minterlisam gsecretasemodulatorsexhibitselectivityformodulationofappcleavagebutinversegsecretasemodulatorsdonot AT osbornebarbaraa gsecretasemodulatorsexhibitselectivityformodulationofappcleavagebutinversegsecretasemodulatorsdonot AT mielelucio gsecretasemodulatorsexhibitselectivityformodulationofappcleavagebutinversegsecretasemodulatorsdonot AT goldetodde gsecretasemodulatorsexhibitselectivityformodulationofappcleavagebutinversegsecretasemodulatorsdonot AT ranyong gsecretasemodulatorsexhibitselectivityformodulationofappcleavagebutinversegsecretasemodulatorsdonot |