Cargando…

Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries

Spatial conservation prioritization is used worldwide for designing marine protected areas (MPA) that achieve set conservation objectives with minimal impacts to marine users. People involved in small-scale fisheries (SSF) may incur negative and disproportionate impacts from implementing MPAs, yet l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kockel, Alessia, Ban, Natalie C., Costa, Maycira, Dearden, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32428006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233339
_version_ 1783536248668815360
author Kockel, Alessia
Ban, Natalie C.
Costa, Maycira
Dearden, Philip
author_facet Kockel, Alessia
Ban, Natalie C.
Costa, Maycira
Dearden, Philip
author_sort Kockel, Alessia
collection PubMed
description Spatial conservation prioritization is used worldwide for designing marine protected areas (MPA) that achieve set conservation objectives with minimal impacts to marine users. People involved in small-scale fisheries (SSF) may incur negative and disproportionate impacts from implementing MPAs, yet limited available data often restricts their representation in MPA planning. Using a Philippines case study, we focus here on the systematic design of a MPA network that aims to minimize and distribute costs equitably for SSF whilst achieving representation targets for biodiversity conservation. The objectives of the study are to: (1) document a participatory mapping approach for collecting SSF data for prioritization using the local knowledge of fishers; and (2) examine how the completeness and resolution of SSF data may affect prioritization outputs in terms of biodiversity representation, spatial efficiency, and distribution equity. In the data-poor region, we conducted participatory mapping workshops with fishers in 79 communities to collect data on the spatial distribution patterns of different SSF fisheries and communities, and employed remote sensing techniques to define coastal habitats, which were targeted for inclusion in MPAs. The datasets were integrated within the decision-support tool Marxan with Zones to develop three scenarios. The SSF data incorporated in each scenario varied based on their completeness (considered all fishing methods or only dominant methods) and resolution (fishing methods itemized by community or municipality). All scenarios derived MPA plans that met representation targets with similar area coverage. The outputs, however, varied in terms of distribution equity, measured by the distribution of opportunity costs (loss of fishing grounds) across different fisheries and communities. Scenarios that did not include minority fisheries or variations between communities, led to inequitable costs. These results highlight the need to incorporate detailed data on SSF at appropriate resolutions, and how this can be achieved through participatory approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7237002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72370022020-06-03 Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries Kockel, Alessia Ban, Natalie C. Costa, Maycira Dearden, Philip PLoS One Research Article Spatial conservation prioritization is used worldwide for designing marine protected areas (MPA) that achieve set conservation objectives with minimal impacts to marine users. People involved in small-scale fisheries (SSF) may incur negative and disproportionate impacts from implementing MPAs, yet limited available data often restricts their representation in MPA planning. Using a Philippines case study, we focus here on the systematic design of a MPA network that aims to minimize and distribute costs equitably for SSF whilst achieving representation targets for biodiversity conservation. The objectives of the study are to: (1) document a participatory mapping approach for collecting SSF data for prioritization using the local knowledge of fishers; and (2) examine how the completeness and resolution of SSF data may affect prioritization outputs in terms of biodiversity representation, spatial efficiency, and distribution equity. In the data-poor region, we conducted participatory mapping workshops with fishers in 79 communities to collect data on the spatial distribution patterns of different SSF fisheries and communities, and employed remote sensing techniques to define coastal habitats, which were targeted for inclusion in MPAs. The datasets were integrated within the decision-support tool Marxan with Zones to develop three scenarios. The SSF data incorporated in each scenario varied based on their completeness (considered all fishing methods or only dominant methods) and resolution (fishing methods itemized by community or municipality). All scenarios derived MPA plans that met representation targets with similar area coverage. The outputs, however, varied in terms of distribution equity, measured by the distribution of opportunity costs (loss of fishing grounds) across different fisheries and communities. Scenarios that did not include minority fisheries or variations between communities, led to inequitable costs. These results highlight the need to incorporate detailed data on SSF at appropriate resolutions, and how this can be achieved through participatory approaches. Public Library of Science 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7237002/ /pubmed/32428006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233339 Text en © 2020 Kockel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kockel, Alessia
Ban, Natalie C.
Costa, Maycira
Dearden, Philip
Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries
title Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries
title_full Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries
title_fullStr Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries
title_short Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries
title_sort addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32428006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233339
work_keys_str_mv AT kockelalessia addressingdistributionequityinspatialconservationprioritizationforsmallscalefisheries
AT bannataliec addressingdistributionequityinspatialconservationprioritizationforsmallscalefisheries
AT costamaycira addressingdistributionequityinspatialconservationprioritizationforsmallscalefisheries
AT deardenphilip addressingdistributionequityinspatialconservationprioritizationforsmallscalefisheries