Cargando…

Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction

The resistive reserve ratio (RRR) expresses the ratio between basal and hyperemic microvascular resistance. RRR measures the vasodilatory capacity of the microcirculation. We compared RRR, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) for predicting microvascular obstru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maznyczka, Annette M., Oldroyd, Keith G., Greenwood, John P., McCartney, Peter J., Cotton, James, Lindsay, Mitchell, McEntegart, Margaret, Rocchiccioli, J. Paul, Good, Richard, Robertson, Keith, Eteiba, Hany, Watkins, Stuart, Shaukat, Aadil, Petrie, Colin J., Murphy, Aengus, Petrie, Mark C., Berry, Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008505
_version_ 1783536252688007168
author Maznyczka, Annette M.
Oldroyd, Keith G.
Greenwood, John P.
McCartney, Peter J.
Cotton, James
Lindsay, Mitchell
McEntegart, Margaret
Rocchiccioli, J. Paul
Good, Richard
Robertson, Keith
Eteiba, Hany
Watkins, Stuart
Shaukat, Aadil
Petrie, Colin J.
Murphy, Aengus
Petrie, Mark C.
Berry, Colin
author_facet Maznyczka, Annette M.
Oldroyd, Keith G.
Greenwood, John P.
McCartney, Peter J.
Cotton, James
Lindsay, Mitchell
McEntegart, Margaret
Rocchiccioli, J. Paul
Good, Richard
Robertson, Keith
Eteiba, Hany
Watkins, Stuart
Shaukat, Aadil
Petrie, Colin J.
Murphy, Aengus
Petrie, Mark C.
Berry, Colin
author_sort Maznyczka, Annette M.
collection PubMed
description The resistive reserve ratio (RRR) expresses the ratio between basal and hyperemic microvascular resistance. RRR measures the vasodilatory capacity of the microcirculation. We compared RRR, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) for predicting microvascular obstruction (MVO), myocardial hemorrhage, infarct size, and clinical outcomes, after ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: In the T-TIME trial (Trial of Low-Dose Adjunctive Alteplase During Primary PCI), 440 patients with acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction from 11 UK hospitals were prospectively enrolled. In a subset of 144 patients, IMR, CFR, and RRR were measured post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention. MVO extent (% left ventricular mass) was determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 2 to 7 days. Infarct size was determined at 3 months. One-year major adverse cardiac events, heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause death/heart failure hospitalizations were assessed. RESULTS: In these 144 patients (mean age, 59±11 years, 80% male), median IMR was 29.5 (interquartile range: 17.0–55.0), CFR was 1.4 (1.1–2.0), and RRR was 1.7 (1.3–2.3). MVO occurred in 41% of patients. IMR>40 was multivariably associated with more MVO (coefficient, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.05–1.02]; P=0.031), myocardial hemorrhage presence (odds ratio [OR], 3.20 [95% CI, 1.25–8.24]; P=0.016), and infarct size (coefficient, 5.05 [95% CI, 0.84–9.26]; P=0.019), independently of CFR≤2.0, RRR≤1.7, myocardial perfusion grade≤1, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count. RRR was multivariably associated with MVO extent (coefficient, −0.60 [95% CI, −0.97 to −0.23]; P=0.002), myocardial hemorrhage presence (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15–0.75]; P=0.008), and infarct size (coefficient, −3.41 [95% CI, −6.76 to −0.06]; P=0.046). IMR>40 was associated with heart failure hospitalization (OR, 5.34 [95% CI, 1.80–15.81] P=0.002), major adverse cardiac events (OR, 4.46 [95% CI, 1.70–11.70] P=0.002), and all-cause death/heart failure hospitalization (OR, 4.08 [95% CI, 1.55–10.79] P=0.005). RRR was associated with heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.19–0.99] P=0.047). CFR was not associated with infarct characteristics or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In acute ST-segment–elevationl infarction, IMR and RRR, but not CFR, were associated with MVO, myocardial hemorrhage, infarct size, and clinical outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02257294.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7237023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72370232020-06-15 Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction Maznyczka, Annette M. Oldroyd, Keith G. Greenwood, John P. McCartney, Peter J. Cotton, James Lindsay, Mitchell McEntegart, Margaret Rocchiccioli, J. Paul Good, Richard Robertson, Keith Eteiba, Hany Watkins, Stuart Shaukat, Aadil Petrie, Colin J. Murphy, Aengus Petrie, Mark C. Berry, Colin Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles The resistive reserve ratio (RRR) expresses the ratio between basal and hyperemic microvascular resistance. RRR measures the vasodilatory capacity of the microcirculation. We compared RRR, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) for predicting microvascular obstruction (MVO), myocardial hemorrhage, infarct size, and clinical outcomes, after ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: In the T-TIME trial (Trial of Low-Dose Adjunctive Alteplase During Primary PCI), 440 patients with acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction from 11 UK hospitals were prospectively enrolled. In a subset of 144 patients, IMR, CFR, and RRR were measured post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention. MVO extent (% left ventricular mass) was determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 2 to 7 days. Infarct size was determined at 3 months. One-year major adverse cardiac events, heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause death/heart failure hospitalizations were assessed. RESULTS: In these 144 patients (mean age, 59±11 years, 80% male), median IMR was 29.5 (interquartile range: 17.0–55.0), CFR was 1.4 (1.1–2.0), and RRR was 1.7 (1.3–2.3). MVO occurred in 41% of patients. IMR>40 was multivariably associated with more MVO (coefficient, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.05–1.02]; P=0.031), myocardial hemorrhage presence (odds ratio [OR], 3.20 [95% CI, 1.25–8.24]; P=0.016), and infarct size (coefficient, 5.05 [95% CI, 0.84–9.26]; P=0.019), independently of CFR≤2.0, RRR≤1.7, myocardial perfusion grade≤1, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count. RRR was multivariably associated with MVO extent (coefficient, −0.60 [95% CI, −0.97 to −0.23]; P=0.002), myocardial hemorrhage presence (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15–0.75]; P=0.008), and infarct size (coefficient, −3.41 [95% CI, −6.76 to −0.06]; P=0.046). IMR>40 was associated with heart failure hospitalization (OR, 5.34 [95% CI, 1.80–15.81] P=0.002), major adverse cardiac events (OR, 4.46 [95% CI, 1.70–11.70] P=0.002), and all-cause death/heart failure hospitalization (OR, 4.08 [95% CI, 1.55–10.79] P=0.005). RRR was associated with heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.19–0.99] P=0.047). CFR was not associated with infarct characteristics or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In acute ST-segment–elevationl infarction, IMR and RRR, but not CFR, were associated with MVO, myocardial hemorrhage, infarct size, and clinical outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02257294. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-05 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7237023/ /pubmed/32408817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008505 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Maznyczka, Annette M.
Oldroyd, Keith G.
Greenwood, John P.
McCartney, Peter J.
Cotton, James
Lindsay, Mitchell
McEntegart, Margaret
Rocchiccioli, J. Paul
Good, Richard
Robertson, Keith
Eteiba, Hany
Watkins, Stuart
Shaukat, Aadil
Petrie, Colin J.
Murphy, Aengus
Petrie, Mark C.
Berry, Colin
Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction
title Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_full Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_short Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_sort comparative significance of invasive measures of microvascular injury in acute myocardial infarction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008505
work_keys_str_mv AT maznyczkaannettem comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT oldroydkeithg comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT greenwoodjohnp comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT mccartneypeterj comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT cottonjames comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT lindsaymitchell comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT mcentegartmargaret comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT rocchicciolijpaul comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT goodrichard comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT robertsonkeith comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT eteibahany comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT watkinsstuart comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT shaukataadil comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT petriecolinj comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT murphyaengus comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT petriemarkc comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT berrycolin comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction