Cargando…
Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction
The resistive reserve ratio (RRR) expresses the ratio between basal and hyperemic microvascular resistance. RRR measures the vasodilatory capacity of the microcirculation. We compared RRR, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) for predicting microvascular obstru...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008505 |
_version_ | 1783536252688007168 |
---|---|
author | Maznyczka, Annette M. Oldroyd, Keith G. Greenwood, John P. McCartney, Peter J. Cotton, James Lindsay, Mitchell McEntegart, Margaret Rocchiccioli, J. Paul Good, Richard Robertson, Keith Eteiba, Hany Watkins, Stuart Shaukat, Aadil Petrie, Colin J. Murphy, Aengus Petrie, Mark C. Berry, Colin |
author_facet | Maznyczka, Annette M. Oldroyd, Keith G. Greenwood, John P. McCartney, Peter J. Cotton, James Lindsay, Mitchell McEntegart, Margaret Rocchiccioli, J. Paul Good, Richard Robertson, Keith Eteiba, Hany Watkins, Stuart Shaukat, Aadil Petrie, Colin J. Murphy, Aengus Petrie, Mark C. Berry, Colin |
author_sort | Maznyczka, Annette M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The resistive reserve ratio (RRR) expresses the ratio between basal and hyperemic microvascular resistance. RRR measures the vasodilatory capacity of the microcirculation. We compared RRR, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) for predicting microvascular obstruction (MVO), myocardial hemorrhage, infarct size, and clinical outcomes, after ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: In the T-TIME trial (Trial of Low-Dose Adjunctive Alteplase During Primary PCI), 440 patients with acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction from 11 UK hospitals were prospectively enrolled. In a subset of 144 patients, IMR, CFR, and RRR were measured post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention. MVO extent (% left ventricular mass) was determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 2 to 7 days. Infarct size was determined at 3 months. One-year major adverse cardiac events, heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause death/heart failure hospitalizations were assessed. RESULTS: In these 144 patients (mean age, 59±11 years, 80% male), median IMR was 29.5 (interquartile range: 17.0–55.0), CFR was 1.4 (1.1–2.0), and RRR was 1.7 (1.3–2.3). MVO occurred in 41% of patients. IMR>40 was multivariably associated with more MVO (coefficient, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.05–1.02]; P=0.031), myocardial hemorrhage presence (odds ratio [OR], 3.20 [95% CI, 1.25–8.24]; P=0.016), and infarct size (coefficient, 5.05 [95% CI, 0.84–9.26]; P=0.019), independently of CFR≤2.0, RRR≤1.7, myocardial perfusion grade≤1, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count. RRR was multivariably associated with MVO extent (coefficient, −0.60 [95% CI, −0.97 to −0.23]; P=0.002), myocardial hemorrhage presence (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15–0.75]; P=0.008), and infarct size (coefficient, −3.41 [95% CI, −6.76 to −0.06]; P=0.046). IMR>40 was associated with heart failure hospitalization (OR, 5.34 [95% CI, 1.80–15.81] P=0.002), major adverse cardiac events (OR, 4.46 [95% CI, 1.70–11.70] P=0.002), and all-cause death/heart failure hospitalization (OR, 4.08 [95% CI, 1.55–10.79] P=0.005). RRR was associated with heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.19–0.99] P=0.047). CFR was not associated with infarct characteristics or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In acute ST-segment–elevationl infarction, IMR and RRR, but not CFR, were associated with MVO, myocardial hemorrhage, infarct size, and clinical outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02257294. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7237023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72370232020-06-15 Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction Maznyczka, Annette M. Oldroyd, Keith G. Greenwood, John P. McCartney, Peter J. Cotton, James Lindsay, Mitchell McEntegart, Margaret Rocchiccioli, J. Paul Good, Richard Robertson, Keith Eteiba, Hany Watkins, Stuart Shaukat, Aadil Petrie, Colin J. Murphy, Aengus Petrie, Mark C. Berry, Colin Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles The resistive reserve ratio (RRR) expresses the ratio between basal and hyperemic microvascular resistance. RRR measures the vasodilatory capacity of the microcirculation. We compared RRR, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) for predicting microvascular obstruction (MVO), myocardial hemorrhage, infarct size, and clinical outcomes, after ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: In the T-TIME trial (Trial of Low-Dose Adjunctive Alteplase During Primary PCI), 440 patients with acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction from 11 UK hospitals were prospectively enrolled. In a subset of 144 patients, IMR, CFR, and RRR were measured post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention. MVO extent (% left ventricular mass) was determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 2 to 7 days. Infarct size was determined at 3 months. One-year major adverse cardiac events, heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause death/heart failure hospitalizations were assessed. RESULTS: In these 144 patients (mean age, 59±11 years, 80% male), median IMR was 29.5 (interquartile range: 17.0–55.0), CFR was 1.4 (1.1–2.0), and RRR was 1.7 (1.3–2.3). MVO occurred in 41% of patients. IMR>40 was multivariably associated with more MVO (coefficient, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.05–1.02]; P=0.031), myocardial hemorrhage presence (odds ratio [OR], 3.20 [95% CI, 1.25–8.24]; P=0.016), and infarct size (coefficient, 5.05 [95% CI, 0.84–9.26]; P=0.019), independently of CFR≤2.0, RRR≤1.7, myocardial perfusion grade≤1, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count. RRR was multivariably associated with MVO extent (coefficient, −0.60 [95% CI, −0.97 to −0.23]; P=0.002), myocardial hemorrhage presence (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15–0.75]; P=0.008), and infarct size (coefficient, −3.41 [95% CI, −6.76 to −0.06]; P=0.046). IMR>40 was associated with heart failure hospitalization (OR, 5.34 [95% CI, 1.80–15.81] P=0.002), major adverse cardiac events (OR, 4.46 [95% CI, 1.70–11.70] P=0.002), and all-cause death/heart failure hospitalization (OR, 4.08 [95% CI, 1.55–10.79] P=0.005). RRR was associated with heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.19–0.99] P=0.047). CFR was not associated with infarct characteristics or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In acute ST-segment–elevationl infarction, IMR and RRR, but not CFR, were associated with MVO, myocardial hemorrhage, infarct size, and clinical outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02257294. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-05 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7237023/ /pubmed/32408817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008505 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Maznyczka, Annette M. Oldroyd, Keith G. Greenwood, John P. McCartney, Peter J. Cotton, James Lindsay, Mitchell McEntegart, Margaret Rocchiccioli, J. Paul Good, Richard Robertson, Keith Eteiba, Hany Watkins, Stuart Shaukat, Aadil Petrie, Colin J. Murphy, Aengus Petrie, Mark C. Berry, Colin Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title | Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_full | Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_fullStr | Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_short | Comparative Significance of Invasive Measures of Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_sort | comparative significance of invasive measures of microvascular injury in acute myocardial infarction |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maznyczkaannettem comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT oldroydkeithg comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT greenwoodjohnp comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT mccartneypeterj comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT cottonjames comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT lindsaymitchell comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT mcentegartmargaret comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT rocchicciolijpaul comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT goodrichard comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT robertsonkeith comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT eteibahany comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT watkinsstuart comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT shaukataadil comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT petriecolinj comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT murphyaengus comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT petriemarkc comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction AT berrycolin comparativesignificanceofinvasivemeasuresofmicrovascularinjuryinacutemyocardialinfarction |