Cargando…

Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Genomic classifiers (GC) have been shown to improve risk stratification post prostatectomy. However, their clinical benefit has not been prospectively demonstrated. We sought to determine the impact of GC testing on postoperative management in men with prostate cancer post prostatectomy....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marascio, Joseph, Spratt, Daniel E., Zhang, Jingbin, Trabulsi, Edouard J., Le, Tiffany, Sedzorme, Worlanyo Sosu, Beeler, Whitney H., Davicioni, Elai, Dabbas, Bashar, Lin, Daniel W., Gore, John L., Bloom, Matthew, Mann, Mark, Mark, J. Ryan, Calvaresi, Anne, Godwin, James L., McCue, Peter, Hurwitz, Mark D., Kelly, W. Kevin, Lallas, Costas D., Knudsen, Karen E., Gomella, Leonard G., Dicker, Adam P., Den, Robert B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-019-0185-7
_version_ 1783536294577569792
author Marascio, Joseph
Spratt, Daniel E.
Zhang, Jingbin
Trabulsi, Edouard J.
Le, Tiffany
Sedzorme, Worlanyo Sosu
Beeler, Whitney H.
Davicioni, Elai
Dabbas, Bashar
Lin, Daniel W.
Gore, John L.
Bloom, Matthew
Mann, Mark
Mark, J. Ryan
Calvaresi, Anne
Godwin, James L.
McCue, Peter
Hurwitz, Mark D.
Kelly, W. Kevin
Lallas, Costas D.
Knudsen, Karen E.
Gomella, Leonard G.
Dicker, Adam P.
Den, Robert B.
author_facet Marascio, Joseph
Spratt, Daniel E.
Zhang, Jingbin
Trabulsi, Edouard J.
Le, Tiffany
Sedzorme, Worlanyo Sosu
Beeler, Whitney H.
Davicioni, Elai
Dabbas, Bashar
Lin, Daniel W.
Gore, John L.
Bloom, Matthew
Mann, Mark
Mark, J. Ryan
Calvaresi, Anne
Godwin, James L.
McCue, Peter
Hurwitz, Mark D.
Kelly, W. Kevin
Lallas, Costas D.
Knudsen, Karen E.
Gomella, Leonard G.
Dicker, Adam P.
Den, Robert B.
author_sort Marascio, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomic classifiers (GC) have been shown to improve risk stratification post prostatectomy. However, their clinical benefit has not been prospectively demonstrated. We sought to determine the impact of GC testing on postoperative management in men with prostate cancer post prostatectomy. METHODS: Two prospective registries of prostate cancer patients treated between 2014 and 2019 were included. All men underwent Decipher tumor testing for adverse features post prostatectomy (Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA). The clinical utility cohort, which measured the change in treatment decision-making, captured pre- and postgenomic treatment recommendations from urologists across diverse practice settings (n = 3455). The clinical benefit cohort, which examined the difference in outcome, was from a single academic institution whose tumor board predefined “best practices” based on GC results (n = 135). RESULTS: In the clinical utility cohort, providers’ recommendations pregenomic testing were primarily observation (69%). GC testing changed recommendations for 39% of patients, translating to a number needed to test of 3 to change one treatment decision. In the clinical benefit cohort, 61% of patients had genomic high-risk tumors; those who received the recommended adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) had 2-year PSA recurrence of 3 vs. 25% for those who did not (HR 0.1 [95% CI 0.0–0.6], p = 0.013). For the genomic low/intermediate-risk patients, 93% followed recommendations for observation, with similar 2-year PSA recurrence rates compared with those who received ART (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The use of GC substantially altered treatment decision-making, with a number needed to test of only 3. Implementing best practices to routinely recommend ART for genomic-high patients led to larger than expected improvements in early biochemical endpoints, without jeopardizing outcomes for genomic-low/intermediate-risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7237345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72373452020-05-27 Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy Marascio, Joseph Spratt, Daniel E. Zhang, Jingbin Trabulsi, Edouard J. Le, Tiffany Sedzorme, Worlanyo Sosu Beeler, Whitney H. Davicioni, Elai Dabbas, Bashar Lin, Daniel W. Gore, John L. Bloom, Matthew Mann, Mark Mark, J. Ryan Calvaresi, Anne Godwin, James L. McCue, Peter Hurwitz, Mark D. Kelly, W. Kevin Lallas, Costas D. Knudsen, Karen E. Gomella, Leonard G. Dicker, Adam P. Den, Robert B. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: Genomic classifiers (GC) have been shown to improve risk stratification post prostatectomy. However, their clinical benefit has not been prospectively demonstrated. We sought to determine the impact of GC testing on postoperative management in men with prostate cancer post prostatectomy. METHODS: Two prospective registries of prostate cancer patients treated between 2014 and 2019 were included. All men underwent Decipher tumor testing for adverse features post prostatectomy (Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA). The clinical utility cohort, which measured the change in treatment decision-making, captured pre- and postgenomic treatment recommendations from urologists across diverse practice settings (n = 3455). The clinical benefit cohort, which examined the difference in outcome, was from a single academic institution whose tumor board predefined “best practices” based on GC results (n = 135). RESULTS: In the clinical utility cohort, providers’ recommendations pregenomic testing were primarily observation (69%). GC testing changed recommendations for 39% of patients, translating to a number needed to test of 3 to change one treatment decision. In the clinical benefit cohort, 61% of patients had genomic high-risk tumors; those who received the recommended adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) had 2-year PSA recurrence of 3 vs. 25% for those who did not (HR 0.1 [95% CI 0.0–0.6], p = 0.013). For the genomic low/intermediate-risk patients, 93% followed recommendations for observation, with similar 2-year PSA recurrence rates compared with those who received ART (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The use of GC substantially altered treatment decision-making, with a number needed to test of only 3. Implementing best practices to routinely recommend ART for genomic-high patients led to larger than expected improvements in early biochemical endpoints, without jeopardizing outcomes for genomic-low/intermediate-risk patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-12 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7237345/ /pubmed/31719663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-019-0185-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Marascio, Joseph
Spratt, Daniel E.
Zhang, Jingbin
Trabulsi, Edouard J.
Le, Tiffany
Sedzorme, Worlanyo Sosu
Beeler, Whitney H.
Davicioni, Elai
Dabbas, Bashar
Lin, Daniel W.
Gore, John L.
Bloom, Matthew
Mann, Mark
Mark, J. Ryan
Calvaresi, Anne
Godwin, James L.
McCue, Peter
Hurwitz, Mark D.
Kelly, W. Kevin
Lallas, Costas D.
Knudsen, Karen E.
Gomella, Leonard G.
Dicker, Adam P.
Den, Robert B.
Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy
title Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy
title_full Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy
title_fullStr Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy
title_short Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy
title_sort prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of decipher testing in men following prostatectomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-019-0185-7
work_keys_str_mv AT marasciojoseph prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT sprattdaniele prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT zhangjingbin prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT trabulsiedouardj prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT letiffany prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT sedzormeworlanyososu prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT beelerwhitneyh prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT davicionielai prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT dabbasbashar prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT lindanielw prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT gorejohnl prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT bloommatthew prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT mannmark prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT markjryan prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT calvaresianne prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT godwinjamesl prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT mccuepeter prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT hurwitzmarkd prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT kellywkevin prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT lallascostasd prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT knudsenkarene prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT gomellaleonardg prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT dickeradamp prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy
AT denrobertb prospectivestudytodefinetheclinicalutilityandbenefitofdeciphertestinginmenfollowingprostatectomy