Cargando…
Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease
Vertical current steering (vCS) divides current between multiple contacts, which reduces radial spread to fine-tune the electric field shape and improves neuroanatomical targeting. vCS may improve the variable responsiveness of Parkinsonian gait to conventional deep brain stimulation. We hypothesize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64250-7 |
_version_ | 1783536314700791808 |
---|---|
author | Hui, Daphne Murgai, Aditya A. Gilmore, Greydon Mohideen, Shabna I. Parrent, Andrew G. Jog, Mandar S. |
author_facet | Hui, Daphne Murgai, Aditya A. Gilmore, Greydon Mohideen, Shabna I. Parrent, Andrew G. Jog, Mandar S. |
author_sort | Hui, Daphne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vertical current steering (vCS) divides current between multiple contacts, which reduces radial spread to fine-tune the electric field shape and improves neuroanatomical targeting. vCS may improve the variable responsiveness of Parkinsonian gait to conventional deep brain stimulation. We hypothesized that vCS elicits greater improvement in ambulation in Parkinson’s disease patients compared to conventional, single-contact stimulation. vCS was implemented with divisions of 70%/30% and 50%/50% and compared to single-contact stimulation with four therapeutic window amplitudes in current-controlled systems. Walking at a self-selected pace was evaluated in seven levodopa-responsive patients. Integrative measures of gait and stimulation parameters were assessed with the functional ambulation performance (FAP) score and total electrical energy delivered (TEED), respectively. A two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test assessed the effect of each stimulation condition on FAP and TEED and compared regression slopes; further, a two-tailed Spearman test identified correlations. vCS significantly lowered the TEED (P < 0.0001); however, FAP scores were not different between conditions (P = 0.786). Compared to single-contact stimulation, vCS elicited higher FAP scores with lower TEED (P = 0.031). FAP and TEED were positively correlated in vCS (P = 2.000 × 10(-5), r = 0.397) and single-contact stimulation (P = 0.034, r = 0.205). Therefore, vCS and single-contact stimulation improved ambulation similarly but vCS reduced the TEED and side-effects at higher amplitudes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7237436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72374362020-05-29 Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease Hui, Daphne Murgai, Aditya A. Gilmore, Greydon Mohideen, Shabna I. Parrent, Andrew G. Jog, Mandar S. Sci Rep Article Vertical current steering (vCS) divides current between multiple contacts, which reduces radial spread to fine-tune the electric field shape and improves neuroanatomical targeting. vCS may improve the variable responsiveness of Parkinsonian gait to conventional deep brain stimulation. We hypothesized that vCS elicits greater improvement in ambulation in Parkinson’s disease patients compared to conventional, single-contact stimulation. vCS was implemented with divisions of 70%/30% and 50%/50% and compared to single-contact stimulation with four therapeutic window amplitudes in current-controlled systems. Walking at a self-selected pace was evaluated in seven levodopa-responsive patients. Integrative measures of gait and stimulation parameters were assessed with the functional ambulation performance (FAP) score and total electrical energy delivered (TEED), respectively. A two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test assessed the effect of each stimulation condition on FAP and TEED and compared regression slopes; further, a two-tailed Spearman test identified correlations. vCS significantly lowered the TEED (P < 0.0001); however, FAP scores were not different between conditions (P = 0.786). Compared to single-contact stimulation, vCS elicited higher FAP scores with lower TEED (P = 0.031). FAP and TEED were positively correlated in vCS (P = 2.000 × 10(-5), r = 0.397) and single-contact stimulation (P = 0.034, r = 0.205). Therefore, vCS and single-contact stimulation improved ambulation similarly but vCS reduced the TEED and side-effects at higher amplitudes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7237436/ /pubmed/32427934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64250-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hui, Daphne Murgai, Aditya A. Gilmore, Greydon Mohideen, Shabna I. Parrent, Andrew G. Jog, Mandar S. Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease |
title | Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease |
title_full | Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease |
title_fullStr | Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease |
title_short | Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease |
title_sort | assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in parkinson’s disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64250-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huidaphne assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease AT murgaiadityaa assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease AT gilmoregreydon assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease AT mohideenshabnai assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease AT parrentandrewg assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease AT jogmandars assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease |