Cargando…

Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease

Vertical current steering (vCS) divides current between multiple contacts, which reduces radial spread to fine-tune the electric field shape and improves neuroanatomical targeting. vCS may improve the variable responsiveness of Parkinsonian gait to conventional deep brain stimulation. We hypothesize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hui, Daphne, Murgai, Aditya A., Gilmore, Greydon, Mohideen, Shabna I., Parrent, Andrew G., Jog, Mandar S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64250-7
_version_ 1783536314700791808
author Hui, Daphne
Murgai, Aditya A.
Gilmore, Greydon
Mohideen, Shabna I.
Parrent, Andrew G.
Jog, Mandar S.
author_facet Hui, Daphne
Murgai, Aditya A.
Gilmore, Greydon
Mohideen, Shabna I.
Parrent, Andrew G.
Jog, Mandar S.
author_sort Hui, Daphne
collection PubMed
description Vertical current steering (vCS) divides current between multiple contacts, which reduces radial spread to fine-tune the electric field shape and improves neuroanatomical targeting. vCS may improve the variable responsiveness of Parkinsonian gait to conventional deep brain stimulation. We hypothesized that vCS elicits greater improvement in ambulation in Parkinson’s disease patients compared to conventional, single-contact stimulation. vCS was implemented with divisions of 70%/30% and 50%/50% and compared to single-contact stimulation with four therapeutic window amplitudes in current-controlled systems. Walking at a self-selected pace was evaluated in seven levodopa-responsive patients. Integrative measures of gait and stimulation parameters were assessed with the functional ambulation performance (FAP) score and total electrical energy delivered (TEED), respectively. A two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test assessed the effect of each stimulation condition on FAP and TEED and compared regression slopes; further, a two-tailed Spearman test identified correlations. vCS significantly lowered the TEED (P < 0.0001); however, FAP scores were not different between conditions (P = 0.786). Compared to single-contact stimulation, vCS elicited higher FAP scores with lower TEED (P = 0.031). FAP and TEED were positively correlated in vCS (P = 2.000 × 10(-5), r = 0.397) and single-contact stimulation (P = 0.034, r = 0.205). Therefore, vCS and single-contact stimulation improved ambulation similarly but vCS reduced the TEED and side-effects at higher amplitudes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7237436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72374362020-05-29 Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease Hui, Daphne Murgai, Aditya A. Gilmore, Greydon Mohideen, Shabna I. Parrent, Andrew G. Jog, Mandar S. Sci Rep Article Vertical current steering (vCS) divides current between multiple contacts, which reduces radial spread to fine-tune the electric field shape and improves neuroanatomical targeting. vCS may improve the variable responsiveness of Parkinsonian gait to conventional deep brain stimulation. We hypothesized that vCS elicits greater improvement in ambulation in Parkinson’s disease patients compared to conventional, single-contact stimulation. vCS was implemented with divisions of 70%/30% and 50%/50% and compared to single-contact stimulation with four therapeutic window amplitudes in current-controlled systems. Walking at a self-selected pace was evaluated in seven levodopa-responsive patients. Integrative measures of gait and stimulation parameters were assessed with the functional ambulation performance (FAP) score and total electrical energy delivered (TEED), respectively. A two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test assessed the effect of each stimulation condition on FAP and TEED and compared regression slopes; further, a two-tailed Spearman test identified correlations. vCS significantly lowered the TEED (P < 0.0001); however, FAP scores were not different between conditions (P = 0.786). Compared to single-contact stimulation, vCS elicited higher FAP scores with lower TEED (P = 0.031). FAP and TEED were positively correlated in vCS (P = 2.000 × 10(-5), r = 0.397) and single-contact stimulation (P = 0.034, r = 0.205). Therefore, vCS and single-contact stimulation improved ambulation similarly but vCS reduced the TEED and side-effects at higher amplitudes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7237436/ /pubmed/32427934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64250-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hui, Daphne
Murgai, Aditya A.
Gilmore, Greydon
Mohideen, Shabna I.
Parrent, Andrew G.
Jog, Mandar S.
Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease
title Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease
title_full Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease
title_short Assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in Parkinson’s disease
title_sort assessing the effect of current steering on the total electrical energy delivered and ambulation in parkinson’s disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64250-7
work_keys_str_mv AT huidaphne assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease
AT murgaiadityaa assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease
AT gilmoregreydon assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease
AT mohideenshabnai assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease
AT parrentandrewg assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease
AT jogmandars assessingtheeffectofcurrentsteeringonthetotalelectricalenergydeliveredandambulationinparkinsonsdisease