Cargando…

Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic

Using GPS-tracked individuals, we compared foraging ecology and reproductive output of a High-Arctic zooplanktivorous seabird, the little auk Alle alle, between three years differing in environmental conditions (sea surface temperature). Despite contrasting environmental conditions, average foraging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakubas, Dariusz, Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna, Iliszko, Lech M., Kidawa, Dorota, Boehnke, Rafał, Błachowiak-Samołyk, Katarzyna, Stempniewicz, Lech
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65210-x
_version_ 1783536327139000320
author Jakubas, Dariusz
Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna
Iliszko, Lech M.
Kidawa, Dorota
Boehnke, Rafał
Błachowiak-Samołyk, Katarzyna
Stempniewicz, Lech
author_facet Jakubas, Dariusz
Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna
Iliszko, Lech M.
Kidawa, Dorota
Boehnke, Rafał
Błachowiak-Samołyk, Katarzyna
Stempniewicz, Lech
author_sort Jakubas, Dariusz
collection PubMed
description Using GPS-tracked individuals, we compared foraging ecology and reproductive output of a High-Arctic zooplanktivorous seabird, the little auk Alle alle, between three years differing in environmental conditions (sea surface temperature). Despite contrasting environmental conditions, average foraging fights distance and duration were generally similar in all studied years. Also, in all years foraging locations visited by the little auk parents during short trips (ST, for chick provisioning) were significantly closer to the colony compared to those visited during long trips (LTs, mainly for adults’ self-maintenance). Nevertheless, we also found some differences in the little auk foraging behaviour: duration of LTs was the longest in the coldest year suggesting more time for resting for adults compared to warmer years. Besides, birds foraged closer to the colony and in significantly colder water in the coldest year. Interestingly, these differences did not affect chick diet: in all the years, the energy content of food loads was similar, with the Arctic copepod, Calanus glacialis copepodite stage V being the most preferred prey item (>73% of items by number and >67% by energy content). Also chick survival was similar in all the study years. However, when examining chicks growth rate we found that their peak body mass was lower in warmer years suggesting that overall conditions in the two warm years were less favourable. While our results, demonstrate a great foraging flexibility by little auks, they also point out their vulnerability to changing environmental conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7237489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72374892020-05-29 Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic Jakubas, Dariusz Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna Iliszko, Lech M. Kidawa, Dorota Boehnke, Rafał Błachowiak-Samołyk, Katarzyna Stempniewicz, Lech Sci Rep Article Using GPS-tracked individuals, we compared foraging ecology and reproductive output of a High-Arctic zooplanktivorous seabird, the little auk Alle alle, between three years differing in environmental conditions (sea surface temperature). Despite contrasting environmental conditions, average foraging fights distance and duration were generally similar in all studied years. Also, in all years foraging locations visited by the little auk parents during short trips (ST, for chick provisioning) were significantly closer to the colony compared to those visited during long trips (LTs, mainly for adults’ self-maintenance). Nevertheless, we also found some differences in the little auk foraging behaviour: duration of LTs was the longest in the coldest year suggesting more time for resting for adults compared to warmer years. Besides, birds foraged closer to the colony and in significantly colder water in the coldest year. Interestingly, these differences did not affect chick diet: in all the years, the energy content of food loads was similar, with the Arctic copepod, Calanus glacialis copepodite stage V being the most preferred prey item (>73% of items by number and >67% by energy content). Also chick survival was similar in all the study years. However, when examining chicks growth rate we found that their peak body mass was lower in warmer years suggesting that overall conditions in the two warm years were less favourable. While our results, demonstrate a great foraging flexibility by little auks, they also point out their vulnerability to changing environmental conditions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7237489/ /pubmed/32427941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65210-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Jakubas, Dariusz
Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna
Iliszko, Lech M.
Kidawa, Dorota
Boehnke, Rafał
Błachowiak-Samołyk, Katarzyna
Stempniewicz, Lech
Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic
title Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic
title_full Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic
title_fullStr Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic
title_short Flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing Arctic
title_sort flexibility of little auks foraging in various oceanographic features in a changing arctic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32427941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65210-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jakubasdariusz flexibilityoflittleauksforaginginvariousoceanographicfeaturesinachangingarctic
AT wojczulanisjakubaskatarzyna flexibilityoflittleauksforaginginvariousoceanographicfeaturesinachangingarctic
AT iliszkolechm flexibilityoflittleauksforaginginvariousoceanographicfeaturesinachangingarctic
AT kidawadorota flexibilityoflittleauksforaginginvariousoceanographicfeaturesinachangingarctic
AT boehnkerafał flexibilityoflittleauksforaginginvariousoceanographicfeaturesinachangingarctic
AT błachowiaksamołykkatarzyna flexibilityoflittleauksforaginginvariousoceanographicfeaturesinachangingarctic
AT stempniewiczlech flexibilityoflittleauksforaginginvariousoceanographicfeaturesinachangingarctic