Cargando…
Prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy
PURPOSE: To assess whether treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) with photodynamic therapy (PDT) and high-density subthreshold micropulse laser (HSML) results in choroidal vascularity index (CVI) changes that may account for the treatment effect. METHODS: Patients with cCSC we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04619-6 |
_version_ | 1783536335246589952 |
---|---|
author | van Rijssen, Thomas J. Singh, Sumit Randhir van Dijk, Elon H. C. Rasheed, Mohammed A. Vupparaboina, Kiran Kumar Boon, Camiel J. F. Chhablani, Jay |
author_facet | van Rijssen, Thomas J. Singh, Sumit Randhir van Dijk, Elon H. C. Rasheed, Mohammed A. Vupparaboina, Kiran Kumar Boon, Camiel J. F. Chhablani, Jay |
author_sort | van Rijssen, Thomas J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess whether treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) with photodynamic therapy (PDT) and high-density subthreshold micropulse laser (HSML) results in choroidal vascularity index (CVI) changes that may account for the treatment effect. METHODS: Patients with cCSC were prospectively included and analyzed. Patients received either half-dose PDT or HSML treatment. CVI of the affected and unaffected eye was obtained before treatment, 6 to 8 weeks after treatment, and 7 to 8 months after treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, 29 eyes (29 patients) were included both in the PDT and in the HSML group. The mean (± standard deviation) CVI change in the HSML group between before PDT and 6 to 8 weeks after PDT was − 0.009 ± 0.032 (p = 0.127), whereas this was 0.0025 ± 0.037 (p = 0.723) between the visit before PDT and final visit. The patients in the PDT group had a CVI change of − 0.0025 ± 0.037 (p = 0.723) between the visit before PDT and first visit after PDT, and a mean CVI change of − 0.013 ± 0.038 (p = 0.080) between the visit before PDT and final visit. There was no significant correlation between CVI and BCVA at the measured time points, in both the HSML group (p = 0.885), and in the PDT group (p = 0.904). Moreover, no significant changes in CVI occurred in the unaffected eye at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: PDT and HSML do not significantly affect CVI, and therefore a CVI change may not be primarily responsible for the treatment effect. The positive treatment effect of both interventions may rely on other mechanisms, such as an effect on choriocapillaris and/or retinal pigment epithelium function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7237528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72375282020-05-27 Prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy van Rijssen, Thomas J. Singh, Sumit Randhir van Dijk, Elon H. C. Rasheed, Mohammed A. Vupparaboina, Kiran Kumar Boon, Camiel J. F. Chhablani, Jay Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Retinal Disorders PURPOSE: To assess whether treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) with photodynamic therapy (PDT) and high-density subthreshold micropulse laser (HSML) results in choroidal vascularity index (CVI) changes that may account for the treatment effect. METHODS: Patients with cCSC were prospectively included and analyzed. Patients received either half-dose PDT or HSML treatment. CVI of the affected and unaffected eye was obtained before treatment, 6 to 8 weeks after treatment, and 7 to 8 months after treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, 29 eyes (29 patients) were included both in the PDT and in the HSML group. The mean (± standard deviation) CVI change in the HSML group between before PDT and 6 to 8 weeks after PDT was − 0.009 ± 0.032 (p = 0.127), whereas this was 0.0025 ± 0.037 (p = 0.723) between the visit before PDT and final visit. The patients in the PDT group had a CVI change of − 0.0025 ± 0.037 (p = 0.723) between the visit before PDT and first visit after PDT, and a mean CVI change of − 0.013 ± 0.038 (p = 0.080) between the visit before PDT and final visit. There was no significant correlation between CVI and BCVA at the measured time points, in both the HSML group (p = 0.885), and in the PDT group (p = 0.904). Moreover, no significant changes in CVI occurred in the unaffected eye at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: PDT and HSML do not significantly affect CVI, and therefore a CVI change may not be primarily responsible for the treatment effect. The positive treatment effect of both interventions may rely on other mechanisms, such as an effect on choriocapillaris and/or retinal pigment epithelium function. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7237528/ /pubmed/32170365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04619-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Retinal Disorders van Rijssen, Thomas J. Singh, Sumit Randhir van Dijk, Elon H. C. Rasheed, Mohammed A. Vupparaboina, Kiran Kumar Boon, Camiel J. F. Chhablani, Jay Prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy |
title | Prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy |
title_full | Prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy |
title_fullStr | Prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy |
title_short | Prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy |
title_sort | prospective evaluation of changes in choroidal vascularity index after half-dose photodynamic therapy versus micropulse laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy |
topic | Retinal Disorders |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04619-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanrijssenthomasj prospectiveevaluationofchangesinchoroidalvascularityindexafterhalfdosephotodynamictherapyversusmicropulselasertreatmentinchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy AT singhsumitrandhir prospectiveevaluationofchangesinchoroidalvascularityindexafterhalfdosephotodynamictherapyversusmicropulselasertreatmentinchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy AT vandijkelonhc prospectiveevaluationofchangesinchoroidalvascularityindexafterhalfdosephotodynamictherapyversusmicropulselasertreatmentinchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy AT rasheedmohammeda prospectiveevaluationofchangesinchoroidalvascularityindexafterhalfdosephotodynamictherapyversusmicropulselasertreatmentinchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy AT vupparaboinakirankumar prospectiveevaluationofchangesinchoroidalvascularityindexafterhalfdosephotodynamictherapyversusmicropulselasertreatmentinchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy AT booncamieljf prospectiveevaluationofchangesinchoroidalvascularityindexafterhalfdosephotodynamictherapyversusmicropulselasertreatmentinchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy AT chhablanijay prospectiveevaluationofchangesinchoroidalvascularityindexafterhalfdosephotodynamictherapyversusmicropulselasertreatmentinchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy |