Cargando…

Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population

BACKGROUND: The aim of this cross-sectional study was (1) to determine the prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis and (2) to reveal the risk indicators associated with peri-implant diseases. The second point was to investigate the role of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant health....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunpinar, Sadiye, Meraci, Bilge, Karas, Mert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00215-9
_version_ 1783536339196575744
author Gunpinar, Sadiye
Meraci, Bilge
Karas, Mert
author_facet Gunpinar, Sadiye
Meraci, Bilge
Karas, Mert
author_sort Gunpinar, Sadiye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this cross-sectional study was (1) to determine the prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis and (2) to reveal the risk indicators associated with peri-implant diseases. The second point was to investigate the role of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-two subjects who were treated with 1415 dental implants between 2011–2017 were clinically evaluated. Patients’ medical and dental history, as well as implant details, were recorded. Peri-implant examination included probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and keratinized tissue width. Furthermore, the patient (sex, age, and smoking) and implant/prosthesis-related factors (surface characteristic, time in function, design of prosthesis etc.) were evaluated. Implants were classified into three groups: healthy, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis. Uni- and multi-variate regression analyses were utilized for statistics. RESULTS: 41.1% (n = 157) and 36.9% (n = 84) of patients had mucositis and peri-implantitis, respectively. 53.6% (n = 758) of implants (95%CI 80.2–90.4) had mucositis, and 21.7% (n = 307) had peri-implantitis. Patients with a maintenance < 2/year (OR = 2.576), having periodontitis (OR = 3.342) and higher PI (OR = 3.046) had significant associations with the development of peri-implant mucositis. Significant ORs were determined for peri-implantitis with patients having maintenance < 2/year (OR = 2.048), having number of implants ≥ 4 (OR = 2.103), diagnosed with periodontitis (OR = 3.295), and higher PI (OR = 7.055). Keratinized tissue width < 2 mm (ORs = 5389/8.013), PPD (ORs = 1.570/8.338), PI (ORs = 6.726/5.205), and BoP (ORs = 3.645/4.353) independent variables were significantly associated with both peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis at implant level, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, the prevalence of mucositis and peri-implantitis was shown to be high in Turkish population. Furthermore, increased risk for peri-implantitis was identified in patients having maintenance < 2/year, presence of periodontitis, poor plaque control, and having number of implants ≥ 4. Less keratinized tissue (< 2 mm), PPD, and BoP were also risk indicators for peri-implantitis development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7237556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72375562020-05-27 Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population Gunpinar, Sadiye Meraci, Bilge Karas, Mert Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this cross-sectional study was (1) to determine the prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis and (2) to reveal the risk indicators associated with peri-implant diseases. The second point was to investigate the role of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-two subjects who were treated with 1415 dental implants between 2011–2017 were clinically evaluated. Patients’ medical and dental history, as well as implant details, were recorded. Peri-implant examination included probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and keratinized tissue width. Furthermore, the patient (sex, age, and smoking) and implant/prosthesis-related factors (surface characteristic, time in function, design of prosthesis etc.) were evaluated. Implants were classified into three groups: healthy, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis. Uni- and multi-variate regression analyses were utilized for statistics. RESULTS: 41.1% (n = 157) and 36.9% (n = 84) of patients had mucositis and peri-implantitis, respectively. 53.6% (n = 758) of implants (95%CI 80.2–90.4) had mucositis, and 21.7% (n = 307) had peri-implantitis. Patients with a maintenance < 2/year (OR = 2.576), having periodontitis (OR = 3.342) and higher PI (OR = 3.046) had significant associations with the development of peri-implant mucositis. Significant ORs were determined for peri-implantitis with patients having maintenance < 2/year (OR = 2.048), having number of implants ≥ 4 (OR = 2.103), diagnosed with periodontitis (OR = 3.295), and higher PI (OR = 7.055). Keratinized tissue width < 2 mm (ORs = 5389/8.013), PPD (ORs = 1.570/8.338), PI (ORs = 6.726/5.205), and BoP (ORs = 3.645/4.353) independent variables were significantly associated with both peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis at implant level, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, the prevalence of mucositis and peri-implantitis was shown to be high in Turkish population. Furthermore, increased risk for peri-implantitis was identified in patients having maintenance < 2/year, presence of periodontitis, poor plaque control, and having number of implants ≥ 4. Less keratinized tissue (< 2 mm), PPD, and BoP were also risk indicators for peri-implantitis development. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7237556/ /pubmed/32430762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00215-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Gunpinar, Sadiye
Meraci, Bilge
Karas, Mert
Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population
title Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population
title_full Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population
title_fullStr Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population
title_short Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population
title_sort analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in turkish population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00215-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gunpinarsadiye analysisofriskindicatorsforprevalenceofperiimplantdiseasesinturkishpopulation
AT meracibilge analysisofriskindicatorsforprevalenceofperiimplantdiseasesinturkishpopulation
AT karasmert analysisofriskindicatorsforprevalenceofperiimplantdiseasesinturkishpopulation