Cargando…

Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis

To evaluate recent developments regarding the epidemiological situation of pseudorabies virus (PRV) infections in wild boar populations in Germany, nationwide serological monitoring was conducted between 2010 and 2015. During this period, a total of 108,748 sera from wild boars were tested for the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denzin, Nicolai, Conraths, Franz J., Mettenleiter, Thomas C., Freuling, Conrad M., Müller, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040276
_version_ 1783536459999870976
author Denzin, Nicolai
Conraths, Franz J.
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Freuling, Conrad M.
Müller, Thomas
author_facet Denzin, Nicolai
Conraths, Franz J.
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Freuling, Conrad M.
Müller, Thomas
author_sort Denzin, Nicolai
collection PubMed
description To evaluate recent developments regarding the epidemiological situation of pseudorabies virus (PRV) infections in wild boar populations in Germany, nationwide serological monitoring was conducted between 2010 and 2015. During this period, a total of 108,748 sera from wild boars were tested for the presence of PRV-specific antibodies using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The overall PRV seroprevalence was estimated at 12.09% for Germany. A significant increase in seroprevalence was observed in recent years indicating both a further spatial spread and strong disease dynamics. For spatiotemporal analysis, data from 1985 to 2009 from previous studies were incorporated. The analysis revealed that PRV infections in wild boar were endemic in all German federal states; the affected area covers at least 48.5% of the German territory. There were marked differences in seroprevalence at district levels as well as in the relative risk (RR) of infection of wild boar throughout Germany. We identified several smaller clusters and one large region, where the RR was two to four times higher as compared to the remaining areas under investigation. Based on the present monitoring intensity and outcome, we provide recommendations with respect to future monitoring efforts concerning PRV infections in wild boar in Germany.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7238075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72380752020-05-28 Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis Denzin, Nicolai Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Freuling, Conrad M. Müller, Thomas Pathogens Article To evaluate recent developments regarding the epidemiological situation of pseudorabies virus (PRV) infections in wild boar populations in Germany, nationwide serological monitoring was conducted between 2010 and 2015. During this period, a total of 108,748 sera from wild boars were tested for the presence of PRV-specific antibodies using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The overall PRV seroprevalence was estimated at 12.09% for Germany. A significant increase in seroprevalence was observed in recent years indicating both a further spatial spread and strong disease dynamics. For spatiotemporal analysis, data from 1985 to 2009 from previous studies were incorporated. The analysis revealed that PRV infections in wild boar were endemic in all German federal states; the affected area covers at least 48.5% of the German territory. There were marked differences in seroprevalence at district levels as well as in the relative risk (RR) of infection of wild boar throughout Germany. We identified several smaller clusters and one large region, where the RR was two to four times higher as compared to the remaining areas under investigation. Based on the present monitoring intensity and outcome, we provide recommendations with respect to future monitoring efforts concerning PRV infections in wild boar in Germany. MDPI 2020-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7238075/ /pubmed/32290098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040276 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Denzin, Nicolai
Conraths, Franz J.
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Freuling, Conrad M.
Müller, Thomas
Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis
title Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis
title_full Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis
title_fullStr Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis
title_short Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis
title_sort monitoring of pseudorabies in wild boar of germany—a spatiotemporal analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040276
work_keys_str_mv AT denzinnicolai monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis
AT conrathsfranzj monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis
AT mettenleiterthomasc monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis
AT freulingconradm monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis
AT mullerthomas monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis