Cargando…
Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis
To evaluate recent developments regarding the epidemiological situation of pseudorabies virus (PRV) infections in wild boar populations in Germany, nationwide serological monitoring was conducted between 2010 and 2015. During this period, a total of 108,748 sera from wild boars were tested for the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040276 |
_version_ | 1783536459999870976 |
---|---|
author | Denzin, Nicolai Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Freuling, Conrad M. Müller, Thomas |
author_facet | Denzin, Nicolai Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Freuling, Conrad M. Müller, Thomas |
author_sort | Denzin, Nicolai |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate recent developments regarding the epidemiological situation of pseudorabies virus (PRV) infections in wild boar populations in Germany, nationwide serological monitoring was conducted between 2010 and 2015. During this period, a total of 108,748 sera from wild boars were tested for the presence of PRV-specific antibodies using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The overall PRV seroprevalence was estimated at 12.09% for Germany. A significant increase in seroprevalence was observed in recent years indicating both a further spatial spread and strong disease dynamics. For spatiotemporal analysis, data from 1985 to 2009 from previous studies were incorporated. The analysis revealed that PRV infections in wild boar were endemic in all German federal states; the affected area covers at least 48.5% of the German territory. There were marked differences in seroprevalence at district levels as well as in the relative risk (RR) of infection of wild boar throughout Germany. We identified several smaller clusters and one large region, where the RR was two to four times higher as compared to the remaining areas under investigation. Based on the present monitoring intensity and outcome, we provide recommendations with respect to future monitoring efforts concerning PRV infections in wild boar in Germany. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7238075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72380752020-05-28 Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis Denzin, Nicolai Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Freuling, Conrad M. Müller, Thomas Pathogens Article To evaluate recent developments regarding the epidemiological situation of pseudorabies virus (PRV) infections in wild boar populations in Germany, nationwide serological monitoring was conducted between 2010 and 2015. During this period, a total of 108,748 sera from wild boars were tested for the presence of PRV-specific antibodies using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The overall PRV seroprevalence was estimated at 12.09% for Germany. A significant increase in seroprevalence was observed in recent years indicating both a further spatial spread and strong disease dynamics. For spatiotemporal analysis, data from 1985 to 2009 from previous studies were incorporated. The analysis revealed that PRV infections in wild boar were endemic in all German federal states; the affected area covers at least 48.5% of the German territory. There were marked differences in seroprevalence at district levels as well as in the relative risk (RR) of infection of wild boar throughout Germany. We identified several smaller clusters and one large region, where the RR was two to four times higher as compared to the remaining areas under investigation. Based on the present monitoring intensity and outcome, we provide recommendations with respect to future monitoring efforts concerning PRV infections in wild boar in Germany. MDPI 2020-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7238075/ /pubmed/32290098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040276 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Denzin, Nicolai Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Freuling, Conrad M. Müller, Thomas Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis |
title | Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis |
title_full | Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis |
title_fullStr | Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis |
title_short | Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany—A Spatiotemporal Analysis |
title_sort | monitoring of pseudorabies in wild boar of germany—a spatiotemporal analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denzinnicolai monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis AT conrathsfranzj monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis AT mettenleiterthomasc monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis AT freulingconradm monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis AT mullerthomas monitoringofpseudorabiesinwildboarofgermanyaspatiotemporalanalysis |