Cargando…

Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. Colonization in Dental Units

Introduction: Dental Unit Waterlines (DUWLs) have shown to be a source of Legionella infection. We report the experience of different dental healthcare settings where a risk management plan was implemented. Materials and methods: In a Hospital Odontostomatology Clinic (HOC) and three Private Dental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuvo, Benedetta, Totaro, Michele, Cristina, Maria Luisa, Spagnolo, Anna Maria, Di Cave, David, Profeti, Sara, Baggiani, Angelo, Privitera, Gaetano, Casini, Beatrice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32326140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040305
_version_ 1783536467115507712
author Tuvo, Benedetta
Totaro, Michele
Cristina, Maria Luisa
Spagnolo, Anna Maria
Di Cave, David
Profeti, Sara
Baggiani, Angelo
Privitera, Gaetano
Casini, Beatrice
author_facet Tuvo, Benedetta
Totaro, Michele
Cristina, Maria Luisa
Spagnolo, Anna Maria
Di Cave, David
Profeti, Sara
Baggiani, Angelo
Privitera, Gaetano
Casini, Beatrice
author_sort Tuvo, Benedetta
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Dental Unit Waterlines (DUWLs) have shown to be a source of Legionella infection. We report the experience of different dental healthcare settings where a risk management plan was implemented. Materials and methods: In a Hospital Odontostomatology Clinic (HOC) and three Private Dental Clinics (PDCs) housing 13 and six dental units (DUs), respectively, an assessment checklist was applied to evaluate staff compliance with guideline recommendations. DUWLs microbial parameters were investigated before and after the application of corrective actions. Results: In the HOC a poor adherence to good practices was demonstrated, whereas protocols were carefully applied in PDCs. L. pneumophila sg 2–15 was isolated in 31% (4/13) and 33% (2/6) of DUs in HOC and PDCs, respectively, mainly from handpieces (32%, 6/19) with counts >10(2) colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/L), often associated with P. aeruginosa (68%, 13/19). The shock disinfection with 3% v/v hydrogen peroxide (HP) showed a limited effect, with a recolonization period of about 4 weeks. Legionella was eradicated only after 6% v/v HP shock disinfection and filters-installation, whilst P. aeruginosa after the third shock disinfection with a solution of 4% v/v HP and biodegradable surfactants. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the presence and persistence of microbial contamination within the DUWLs, which required strict adherence to control measures and the choice of effective disinfectants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7238104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72381042020-05-28 Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. Colonization in Dental Units Tuvo, Benedetta Totaro, Michele Cristina, Maria Luisa Spagnolo, Anna Maria Di Cave, David Profeti, Sara Baggiani, Angelo Privitera, Gaetano Casini, Beatrice Pathogens Article Introduction: Dental Unit Waterlines (DUWLs) have shown to be a source of Legionella infection. We report the experience of different dental healthcare settings where a risk management plan was implemented. Materials and methods: In a Hospital Odontostomatology Clinic (HOC) and three Private Dental Clinics (PDCs) housing 13 and six dental units (DUs), respectively, an assessment checklist was applied to evaluate staff compliance with guideline recommendations. DUWLs microbial parameters were investigated before and after the application of corrective actions. Results: In the HOC a poor adherence to good practices was demonstrated, whereas protocols were carefully applied in PDCs. L. pneumophila sg 2–15 was isolated in 31% (4/13) and 33% (2/6) of DUs in HOC and PDCs, respectively, mainly from handpieces (32%, 6/19) with counts >10(2) colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/L), often associated with P. aeruginosa (68%, 13/19). The shock disinfection with 3% v/v hydrogen peroxide (HP) showed a limited effect, with a recolonization period of about 4 weeks. Legionella was eradicated only after 6% v/v HP shock disinfection and filters-installation, whilst P. aeruginosa after the third shock disinfection with a solution of 4% v/v HP and biodegradable surfactants. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the presence and persistence of microbial contamination within the DUWLs, which required strict adherence to control measures and the choice of effective disinfectants. MDPI 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7238104/ /pubmed/32326140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040305 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tuvo, Benedetta
Totaro, Michele
Cristina, Maria Luisa
Spagnolo, Anna Maria
Di Cave, David
Profeti, Sara
Baggiani, Angelo
Privitera, Gaetano
Casini, Beatrice
Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_full Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_fullStr Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_full_unstemmed Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_short Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_sort prevention and control of legionella and pseudomonas spp. colonization in dental units
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32326140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040305
work_keys_str_mv AT tuvobenedetta preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits
AT totaromichele preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits
AT cristinamarialuisa preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits
AT spagnoloannamaria preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits
AT dicavedavid preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits
AT profetisara preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits
AT baggianiangelo preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits
AT priviteragaetano preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits
AT casinibeatrice preventionandcontroloflegionellaandpseudomonassppcolonizationindentalunits