Cargando…
Anthology of Dirofilariasis in Russia (1915–2017)
Dirofilariasis is a helminths vector-borne disease caused by two species of Dirofolaria—D. repens and D. immitis. The former is overwhelmingly associated with human dirofilariasis. The vector of the worm are mosquitoes of the family Culicidae (largely Culex, Aedes and Anopheles). The definitive host...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040275 |
_version_ | 1783536497878630400 |
---|---|
author | Kondrashin, Anatoly V. Morozova, Lola F. Stepanova, Ekaterina V. Turbabina, Natalia A. Maksimova, Maria S. Morozov, Evgeny N. |
author_facet | Kondrashin, Anatoly V. Morozova, Lola F. Stepanova, Ekaterina V. Turbabina, Natalia A. Maksimova, Maria S. Morozov, Evgeny N. |
author_sort | Kondrashin, Anatoly V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dirofilariasis is a helminths vector-borne disease caused by two species of Dirofolaria—D. repens and D. immitis. The former is overwhelmingly associated with human dirofilariasis. The vector of the worm are mosquitoes of the family Culicidae (largely Culex, Aedes and Anopheles). The definitive hosts of Dirofilaria are dogs and to a lesser extent cats. Humans are an accidental host. A total of 1200 human cases caused by Dirofilaria were registered in the territory of the ex-USSR during the period 1915–2016. Zonal differences have been seen in the prevalence of infected dogs and mosquitoes. Studies undertaken in the southern part of the Russian Federation (RF) revealed the prevalence of Dirofilaria in dogs to be 20.8% with wild variations of larva density. Studies carried out in the central part of the RF found that the prevalence of parasites in dogs was 4.1%. Aedes mosquitoes were infected less than Culex and Anopheles mosquitoes. The latter were infected by D. repens more often than Culex and Aedes. Zonal differences were also traced in regard to Dirofilaria prevalence in humans, thus allowing identification of three zones of risk of infection (low, moderate, and stable), reflected in a series of constructed maps. Although Dirofilariasis was known on the territory of Russia from 1915, only sporadic cases of the disease were reported occasionally. Its number was showed an increasing trend only during the 1980s–1990s, reaching the level of hundreds of cases. The majority of cases were confined to the southern parts of Russia with geographic coordinates of 43°–45° on the northern latitude. Comparison of the timing of the global trend of climate warming during the 1990s with the temporal pattern of Dirofilaria on the territory of Russia during the same period demonstrated a close association between two phenomena. With the continuous process of global climate warming, the incidence of dirofilariasis both in man and dogs goes unabated exemplified by the territorial expansion of the disease northwards and eastwards attaining the latitude of 56°–57° on the northern latitude in the European and Asian parts of Russia. It appears that within the period of the last 20–25 years, the population at risk has doubled. Under these circumstances, dirofilariases in Russia should be considered as an emerging public health problem necessitating the establishment of a comprehensive epidemiological monitoring system with strong entomological and veterinary components. Based on the results obtained, an appropriate control intervention could be developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7238230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72382302020-05-28 Anthology of Dirofilariasis in Russia (1915–2017) Kondrashin, Anatoly V. Morozova, Lola F. Stepanova, Ekaterina V. Turbabina, Natalia A. Maksimova, Maria S. Morozov, Evgeny N. Pathogens Review Dirofilariasis is a helminths vector-borne disease caused by two species of Dirofolaria—D. repens and D. immitis. The former is overwhelmingly associated with human dirofilariasis. The vector of the worm are mosquitoes of the family Culicidae (largely Culex, Aedes and Anopheles). The definitive hosts of Dirofilaria are dogs and to a lesser extent cats. Humans are an accidental host. A total of 1200 human cases caused by Dirofilaria were registered in the territory of the ex-USSR during the period 1915–2016. Zonal differences have been seen in the prevalence of infected dogs and mosquitoes. Studies undertaken in the southern part of the Russian Federation (RF) revealed the prevalence of Dirofilaria in dogs to be 20.8% with wild variations of larva density. Studies carried out in the central part of the RF found that the prevalence of parasites in dogs was 4.1%. Aedes mosquitoes were infected less than Culex and Anopheles mosquitoes. The latter were infected by D. repens more often than Culex and Aedes. Zonal differences were also traced in regard to Dirofilaria prevalence in humans, thus allowing identification of three zones of risk of infection (low, moderate, and stable), reflected in a series of constructed maps. Although Dirofilariasis was known on the territory of Russia from 1915, only sporadic cases of the disease were reported occasionally. Its number was showed an increasing trend only during the 1980s–1990s, reaching the level of hundreds of cases. The majority of cases were confined to the southern parts of Russia with geographic coordinates of 43°–45° on the northern latitude. Comparison of the timing of the global trend of climate warming during the 1990s with the temporal pattern of Dirofilaria on the territory of Russia during the same period demonstrated a close association between two phenomena. With the continuous process of global climate warming, the incidence of dirofilariasis both in man and dogs goes unabated exemplified by the territorial expansion of the disease northwards and eastwards attaining the latitude of 56°–57° on the northern latitude in the European and Asian parts of Russia. It appears that within the period of the last 20–25 years, the population at risk has doubled. Under these circumstances, dirofilariases in Russia should be considered as an emerging public health problem necessitating the establishment of a comprehensive epidemiological monitoring system with strong entomological and veterinary components. Based on the results obtained, an appropriate control intervention could be developed. MDPI 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7238230/ /pubmed/32283873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040275 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kondrashin, Anatoly V. Morozova, Lola F. Stepanova, Ekaterina V. Turbabina, Natalia A. Maksimova, Maria S. Morozov, Evgeny N. Anthology of Dirofilariasis in Russia (1915–2017) |
title | Anthology of Dirofilariasis in Russia (1915–2017) |
title_full | Anthology of Dirofilariasis in Russia (1915–2017) |
title_fullStr | Anthology of Dirofilariasis in Russia (1915–2017) |
title_full_unstemmed | Anthology of Dirofilariasis in Russia (1915–2017) |
title_short | Anthology of Dirofilariasis in Russia (1915–2017) |
title_sort | anthology of dirofilariasis in russia (1915–2017) |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kondrashinanatolyv anthologyofdirofilariasisinrussia19152017 AT morozovalolaf anthologyofdirofilariasisinrussia19152017 AT stepanovaekaterinav anthologyofdirofilariasisinrussia19152017 AT turbabinanataliaa anthologyofdirofilariasisinrussia19152017 AT maksimovamarias anthologyofdirofilariasisinrussia19152017 AT morozovevgenyn anthologyofdirofilariasisinrussia19152017 |