Cargando…
Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type
BACKGROUND: As the quality and quantity of patient-centered care may be perceived differently by recipients and independent observers, assessment of humanization of pediatric care remains an elusive issue. Herein we aim to analyze differences between the degrees of verified existing vs. perceived hu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00824-5 |
_version_ | 1783536564646707200 |
---|---|
author | Mandato, C. Siano, M. A. De Anseris, A. G. E. Tripodi, M. Massa, G. De Rosa, R. Buffoli, M. Lamanna, A. Siani, P. Vajro, P. |
author_facet | Mandato, C. Siano, M. A. De Anseris, A. G. E. Tripodi, M. Massa, G. De Rosa, R. Buffoli, M. Lamanna, A. Siani, P. Vajro, P. |
author_sort | Mandato, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the quality and quantity of patient-centered care may be perceived differently by recipients and independent observers, assessment of humanization of pediatric care remains an elusive issue. Herein we aim to analyze differences between the degrees of verified existing vs. perceived humanization issues of a pediatric ward. Furthermore, we examine whether there is concurrence between the degrees of humanization perceived by users (parents/visitors) vs. staff members. METHODS: The study was conducted in the pediatric wards of seven medical centers of the Campania region (Italy) categorized as general (n = 4), children’s (n = 1), and university (n = 2) hospitals. The degree of existing humanization was assessed by a multidisciplinary focus group for each hospital through a pediatric care-oriented checklist specifically developed to individuate the most critical areas (i.e., those with scores < 2.5). The degree of perceived humanization was assessed through four indicators: well-being, social aspects, safety and security, and health promotion. RESULTS: The focus groups showed that critical areas common to all centers were mainly concerned with welfare, mediation, translation, and interpretation services. Specific critical issues were care and organizational processes oriented to the respect and specificity of the person and care of the relationship with the patient. Perceived humanization questionnaires revealed a lack of recreational facilities and mediation and translation services. As for specific features investigated by both tools, it was found that mediation and interpretation services were lacking in all facilities while patient perceptions and observer ratings for space, comfort, and orientation concurred only in the general hospital evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Future humanization interventions to ensure child- and family-friendly hospital care call for careful preliminary assessments, tailored to each pediatric ward category, which should consider possible differences between perceived and verified characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7238599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72385992020-05-29 Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type Mandato, C. Siano, M. A. De Anseris, A. G. E. Tripodi, M. Massa, G. De Rosa, R. Buffoli, M. Lamanna, A. Siani, P. Vajro, P. Ital J Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: As the quality and quantity of patient-centered care may be perceived differently by recipients and independent observers, assessment of humanization of pediatric care remains an elusive issue. Herein we aim to analyze differences between the degrees of verified existing vs. perceived humanization issues of a pediatric ward. Furthermore, we examine whether there is concurrence between the degrees of humanization perceived by users (parents/visitors) vs. staff members. METHODS: The study was conducted in the pediatric wards of seven medical centers of the Campania region (Italy) categorized as general (n = 4), children’s (n = 1), and university (n = 2) hospitals. The degree of existing humanization was assessed by a multidisciplinary focus group for each hospital through a pediatric care-oriented checklist specifically developed to individuate the most critical areas (i.e., those with scores < 2.5). The degree of perceived humanization was assessed through four indicators: well-being, social aspects, safety and security, and health promotion. RESULTS: The focus groups showed that critical areas common to all centers were mainly concerned with welfare, mediation, translation, and interpretation services. Specific critical issues were care and organizational processes oriented to the respect and specificity of the person and care of the relationship with the patient. Perceived humanization questionnaires revealed a lack of recreational facilities and mediation and translation services. As for specific features investigated by both tools, it was found that mediation and interpretation services were lacking in all facilities while patient perceptions and observer ratings for space, comfort, and orientation concurred only in the general hospital evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Future humanization interventions to ensure child- and family-friendly hospital care call for careful preliminary assessments, tailored to each pediatric ward category, which should consider possible differences between perceived and verified characteristics. BioMed Central 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7238599/ /pubmed/32430001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00824-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mandato, C. Siano, M. A. De Anseris, A. G. E. Tripodi, M. Massa, G. De Rosa, R. Buffoli, M. Lamanna, A. Siani, P. Vajro, P. Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type |
title | Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type |
title_full | Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type |
title_fullStr | Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type |
title_full_unstemmed | Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type |
title_short | Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type |
title_sort | humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00824-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mandatoc humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT sianoma humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT deanserisage humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT tripodim humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT massag humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT derosar humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT buffolim humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT lamannaa humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT sianip humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype AT vajrop humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype |