Cargando…

Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type

BACKGROUND: As the quality and quantity of patient-centered care may be perceived differently by recipients and independent observers, assessment of humanization of pediatric care remains an elusive issue. Herein we aim to analyze differences between the degrees of verified existing vs. perceived hu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandato, C., Siano, M. A., De Anseris, A. G. E., Tripodi, M., Massa, G., De Rosa, R., Buffoli, M., Lamanna, A., Siani, P., Vajro, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00824-5
_version_ 1783536564646707200
author Mandato, C.
Siano, M. A.
De Anseris, A. G. E.
Tripodi, M.
Massa, G.
De Rosa, R.
Buffoli, M.
Lamanna, A.
Siani, P.
Vajro, P.
author_facet Mandato, C.
Siano, M. A.
De Anseris, A. G. E.
Tripodi, M.
Massa, G.
De Rosa, R.
Buffoli, M.
Lamanna, A.
Siani, P.
Vajro, P.
author_sort Mandato, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As the quality and quantity of patient-centered care may be perceived differently by recipients and independent observers, assessment of humanization of pediatric care remains an elusive issue. Herein we aim to analyze differences between the degrees of verified existing vs. perceived humanization issues of a pediatric ward. Furthermore, we examine whether there is concurrence between the degrees of humanization perceived by users (parents/visitors) vs. staff members. METHODS: The study was conducted in the pediatric wards of seven medical centers of the Campania region (Italy) categorized as general (n = 4), children’s (n = 1), and university (n = 2) hospitals. The degree of existing humanization was assessed by a multidisciplinary focus group for each hospital through a pediatric care-oriented checklist specifically developed to individuate the most critical areas (i.e., those with scores < 2.5). The degree of perceived humanization was assessed through four indicators: well-being, social aspects, safety and security, and health promotion. RESULTS: The focus groups showed that critical areas common to all centers were mainly concerned with welfare, mediation, translation, and interpretation services. Specific critical issues were care and organizational processes oriented to the respect and specificity of the person and care of the relationship with the patient. Perceived humanization questionnaires revealed a lack of recreational facilities and mediation and translation services. As for specific features investigated by both tools, it was found that mediation and interpretation services were lacking in all facilities while patient perceptions and observer ratings for space, comfort, and orientation concurred only in the general hospital evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Future humanization interventions to ensure child- and family-friendly hospital care call for careful preliminary assessments, tailored to each pediatric ward category, which should consider possible differences between perceived and verified characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7238599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72385992020-05-29 Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type Mandato, C. Siano, M. A. De Anseris, A. G. E. Tripodi, M. Massa, G. De Rosa, R. Buffoli, M. Lamanna, A. Siani, P. Vajro, P. Ital J Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: As the quality and quantity of patient-centered care may be perceived differently by recipients and independent observers, assessment of humanization of pediatric care remains an elusive issue. Herein we aim to analyze differences between the degrees of verified existing vs. perceived humanization issues of a pediatric ward. Furthermore, we examine whether there is concurrence between the degrees of humanization perceived by users (parents/visitors) vs. staff members. METHODS: The study was conducted in the pediatric wards of seven medical centers of the Campania region (Italy) categorized as general (n = 4), children’s (n = 1), and university (n = 2) hospitals. The degree of existing humanization was assessed by a multidisciplinary focus group for each hospital through a pediatric care-oriented checklist specifically developed to individuate the most critical areas (i.e., those with scores < 2.5). The degree of perceived humanization was assessed through four indicators: well-being, social aspects, safety and security, and health promotion. RESULTS: The focus groups showed that critical areas common to all centers were mainly concerned with welfare, mediation, translation, and interpretation services. Specific critical issues were care and organizational processes oriented to the respect and specificity of the person and care of the relationship with the patient. Perceived humanization questionnaires revealed a lack of recreational facilities and mediation and translation services. As for specific features investigated by both tools, it was found that mediation and interpretation services were lacking in all facilities while patient perceptions and observer ratings for space, comfort, and orientation concurred only in the general hospital evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Future humanization interventions to ensure child- and family-friendly hospital care call for careful preliminary assessments, tailored to each pediatric ward category, which should consider possible differences between perceived and verified characteristics. BioMed Central 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7238599/ /pubmed/32430001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00824-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mandato, C.
Siano, M. A.
De Anseris, A. G. E.
Tripodi, M.
Massa, G.
De Rosa, R.
Buffoli, M.
Lamanna, A.
Siani, P.
Vajro, P.
Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type
title Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type
title_full Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type
title_fullStr Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type
title_full_unstemmed Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type
title_short Humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type
title_sort humanization of care in pediatric wards: differences between perceptions of users and staff according to department type
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00824-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mandatoc humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT sianoma humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT deanserisage humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT tripodim humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT massag humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT derosar humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT buffolim humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT lamannaa humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT sianip humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype
AT vajrop humanizationofcareinpediatricwardsdifferencesbetweenperceptionsofusersandstaffaccordingtodepartmenttype