Cargando…
RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION
BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures heavily rely on radiographic measurements. Therefore, it is important to establish reliability of these parameters to assist with standardizing classification and subsequent treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To improve upon and sub...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238781/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00192 |
_version_ | 1783536596375568384 |
---|---|
author | Ellis, Henry B. Zynda, Aaron J. Cruz, Aristides Sachleben, Brant Sargent, Catherine Green, Daniel Warnick, Drew Schmale, Gregory Jagodzinski, Jason Rhodes, Jason Mistovich, Justin Fabricant, Peter D. McKay, Scott Yen, Yi-Meng Ganley, Theodore |
author_facet | Ellis, Henry B. Zynda, Aaron J. Cruz, Aristides Sachleben, Brant Sargent, Catherine Green, Daniel Warnick, Drew Schmale, Gregory Jagodzinski, Jason Rhodes, Jason Mistovich, Justin Fabricant, Peter D. McKay, Scott Yen, Yi-Meng Ganley, Theodore |
author_sort | Ellis, Henry B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures heavily rely on radiographic measurements. Therefore, it is important to establish reliability of these parameters to assist with standardizing classification and subsequent treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To improve upon and subsequently validate a proposed measurement system following a live, in-person case review, re-training, and implementation of a new classification of tibial spine fractures. METHODS: Following unacceptable classification reliability amongst the tibial spine research interest group when using the original Meyers & McKeever (M&M) classification, a one-hour, live, in-person case review (n=10) of tibial spine fractures with collective agreement on measurements and classification was performed. Based on discussion, a modification of the original M&M classification was developed to specifically define verbiage that lead to unacceptable variance in the original reliability testing. These included a quantitative definition of posterior hinge and the presence of comminution (Figure 1). New reference guidelines were provided to each reviewer demonstrating specific measurements and modified M&M classification prior to subsequent case review along with a new set of randomized, de-identified images. Forty subjects were included, determined as a precedent based on previous reliability studies. Data were analyzed using kappa and ICC for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, data from 6 surgeon raters were included on a total of 40 cases. Amongst these raters, all variables demonstrated poor interobserver reliability: maximal posterior displacement (ICC=0.23, 95% CI=0.11-0.38), modified M&M classification (Cohen’s Kappa=0.25), amount of comminution (Cohen’s Kappa=0.27), and recommended treatment (Cohen’s Kappa=0.19). CONCLUSION: Reliability of radiographic measurements and a modified classification for tibial spine fractures remains unacceptable even amongst a group of surgeon experts. A new classification schema may be needed to help reliably guide treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7238781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72387812020-06-01 RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION Ellis, Henry B. Zynda, Aaron J. Cruz, Aristides Sachleben, Brant Sargent, Catherine Green, Daniel Warnick, Drew Schmale, Gregory Jagodzinski, Jason Rhodes, Jason Mistovich, Justin Fabricant, Peter D. McKay, Scott Yen, Yi-Meng Ganley, Theodore Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures heavily rely on radiographic measurements. Therefore, it is important to establish reliability of these parameters to assist with standardizing classification and subsequent treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To improve upon and subsequently validate a proposed measurement system following a live, in-person case review, re-training, and implementation of a new classification of tibial spine fractures. METHODS: Following unacceptable classification reliability amongst the tibial spine research interest group when using the original Meyers & McKeever (M&M) classification, a one-hour, live, in-person case review (n=10) of tibial spine fractures with collective agreement on measurements and classification was performed. Based on discussion, a modification of the original M&M classification was developed to specifically define verbiage that lead to unacceptable variance in the original reliability testing. These included a quantitative definition of posterior hinge and the presence of comminution (Figure 1). New reference guidelines were provided to each reviewer demonstrating specific measurements and modified M&M classification prior to subsequent case review along with a new set of randomized, de-identified images. Forty subjects were included, determined as a precedent based on previous reliability studies. Data were analyzed using kappa and ICC for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, data from 6 surgeon raters were included on a total of 40 cases. Amongst these raters, all variables demonstrated poor interobserver reliability: maximal posterior displacement (ICC=0.23, 95% CI=0.11-0.38), modified M&M classification (Cohen’s Kappa=0.25), amount of comminution (Cohen’s Kappa=0.27), and recommended treatment (Cohen’s Kappa=0.19). CONCLUSION: Reliability of radiographic measurements and a modified classification for tibial spine fractures remains unacceptable even amongst a group of surgeon experts. A new classification schema may be needed to help reliably guide treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures. SAGE Publications 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7238781/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00192 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions. |
spellingShingle | Article Ellis, Henry B. Zynda, Aaron J. Cruz, Aristides Sachleben, Brant Sargent, Catherine Green, Daniel Warnick, Drew Schmale, Gregory Jagodzinski, Jason Rhodes, Jason Mistovich, Justin Fabricant, Peter D. McKay, Scott Yen, Yi-Meng Ganley, Theodore RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION |
title | RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION |
title_full | RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION |
title_fullStr | RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION |
title_full_unstemmed | RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION |
title_short | RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION |
title_sort | re-training is ineffective in improving reliability of tibial spine measurements and classification |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238781/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellishenryb retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT zyndaaaronj retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT cruzaristides retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT sachlebenbrant retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT sargentcatherine retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT greendaniel retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT warnickdrew retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT schmalegregory retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT jagodzinskijason retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT rhodesjason retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT mistovichjustin retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT fabricantpeterd retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT mckayscott retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT yenyimeng retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification AT ganleytheodore retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification |