Cargando…

RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION

BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures heavily rely on radiographic measurements. Therefore, it is important to establish reliability of these parameters to assist with standardizing classification and subsequent treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To improve upon and sub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellis, Henry B., Zynda, Aaron J., Cruz, Aristides, Sachleben, Brant, Sargent, Catherine, Green, Daniel, Warnick, Drew, Schmale, Gregory, Jagodzinski, Jason, Rhodes, Jason, Mistovich, Justin, Fabricant, Peter D., McKay, Scott, Yen, Yi-Meng, Ganley, Theodore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238781/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00192
_version_ 1783536596375568384
author Ellis, Henry B.
Zynda, Aaron J.
Cruz, Aristides
Sachleben, Brant
Sargent, Catherine
Green, Daniel
Warnick, Drew
Schmale, Gregory
Jagodzinski, Jason
Rhodes, Jason
Mistovich, Justin
Fabricant, Peter D.
McKay, Scott
Yen, Yi-Meng
Ganley, Theodore
author_facet Ellis, Henry B.
Zynda, Aaron J.
Cruz, Aristides
Sachleben, Brant
Sargent, Catherine
Green, Daniel
Warnick, Drew
Schmale, Gregory
Jagodzinski, Jason
Rhodes, Jason
Mistovich, Justin
Fabricant, Peter D.
McKay, Scott
Yen, Yi-Meng
Ganley, Theodore
author_sort Ellis, Henry B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures heavily rely on radiographic measurements. Therefore, it is important to establish reliability of these parameters to assist with standardizing classification and subsequent treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To improve upon and subsequently validate a proposed measurement system following a live, in-person case review, re-training, and implementation of a new classification of tibial spine fractures. METHODS: Following unacceptable classification reliability amongst the tibial spine research interest group when using the original Meyers & McKeever (M&M) classification, a one-hour, live, in-person case review (n=10) of tibial spine fractures with collective agreement on measurements and classification was performed. Based on discussion, a modification of the original M&M classification was developed to specifically define verbiage that lead to unacceptable variance in the original reliability testing. These included a quantitative definition of posterior hinge and the presence of comminution (Figure 1). New reference guidelines were provided to each reviewer demonstrating specific measurements and modified M&M classification prior to subsequent case review along with a new set of randomized, de-identified images. Forty subjects were included, determined as a precedent based on previous reliability studies. Data were analyzed using kappa and ICC for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, data from 6 surgeon raters were included on a total of 40 cases. Amongst these raters, all variables demonstrated poor interobserver reliability: maximal posterior displacement (ICC=0.23, 95% CI=0.11-0.38), modified M&M classification (Cohen’s Kappa=0.25), amount of comminution (Cohen’s Kappa=0.27), and recommended treatment (Cohen’s Kappa=0.19). CONCLUSION: Reliability of radiographic measurements and a modified classification for tibial spine fractures remains unacceptable even amongst a group of surgeon experts. A new classification schema may be needed to help reliably guide treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7238781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72387812020-06-01 RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION Ellis, Henry B. Zynda, Aaron J. Cruz, Aristides Sachleben, Brant Sargent, Catherine Green, Daniel Warnick, Drew Schmale, Gregory Jagodzinski, Jason Rhodes, Jason Mistovich, Justin Fabricant, Peter D. McKay, Scott Yen, Yi-Meng Ganley, Theodore Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures heavily rely on radiographic measurements. Therefore, it is important to establish reliability of these parameters to assist with standardizing classification and subsequent treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To improve upon and subsequently validate a proposed measurement system following a live, in-person case review, re-training, and implementation of a new classification of tibial spine fractures. METHODS: Following unacceptable classification reliability amongst the tibial spine research interest group when using the original Meyers & McKeever (M&M) classification, a one-hour, live, in-person case review (n=10) of tibial spine fractures with collective agreement on measurements and classification was performed. Based on discussion, a modification of the original M&M classification was developed to specifically define verbiage that lead to unacceptable variance in the original reliability testing. These included a quantitative definition of posterior hinge and the presence of comminution (Figure 1). New reference guidelines were provided to each reviewer demonstrating specific measurements and modified M&M classification prior to subsequent case review along with a new set of randomized, de-identified images. Forty subjects were included, determined as a precedent based on previous reliability studies. Data were analyzed using kappa and ICC for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, data from 6 surgeon raters were included on a total of 40 cases. Amongst these raters, all variables demonstrated poor interobserver reliability: maximal posterior displacement (ICC=0.23, 95% CI=0.11-0.38), modified M&M classification (Cohen’s Kappa=0.25), amount of comminution (Cohen’s Kappa=0.27), and recommended treatment (Cohen’s Kappa=0.19). CONCLUSION: Reliability of radiographic measurements and a modified classification for tibial spine fractures remains unacceptable even amongst a group of surgeon experts. A new classification schema may be needed to help reliably guide treatment decisions for patients with tibial spine fractures. SAGE Publications 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7238781/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00192 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Ellis, Henry B.
Zynda, Aaron J.
Cruz, Aristides
Sachleben, Brant
Sargent, Catherine
Green, Daniel
Warnick, Drew
Schmale, Gregory
Jagodzinski, Jason
Rhodes, Jason
Mistovich, Justin
Fabricant, Peter D.
McKay, Scott
Yen, Yi-Meng
Ganley, Theodore
RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION
title RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION
title_full RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION
title_fullStr RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION
title_full_unstemmed RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION
title_short RE-TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF TIBIAL SPINE MEASUREMENTS AND CLASSIFICATION
title_sort re-training is ineffective in improving reliability of tibial spine measurements and classification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238781/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00192
work_keys_str_mv AT ellishenryb retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT zyndaaaronj retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT cruzaristides retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT sachlebenbrant retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT sargentcatherine retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT greendaniel retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT warnickdrew retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT schmalegregory retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT jagodzinskijason retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT rhodesjason retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT mistovichjustin retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT fabricantpeterd retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT mckayscott retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT yenyimeng retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification
AT ganleytheodore retrainingisineffectiveinimprovingreliabilityoftibialspinemeasurementsandclassification