Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Patellar instability remains a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Recurrent patellar instability is traditionally treated with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a suture anchor or bone tunnel technique. Although the use of transosseous sutures was rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Mao, Zhang, Hangzhou, Liang, Qingwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120917112
_version_ 1783536602850525184
author Ye, Mao
Zhang, Hangzhou
Liang, Qingwei
author_facet Ye, Mao
Zhang, Hangzhou
Liang, Qingwei
author_sort Ye, Mao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patellar instability remains a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Recurrent patellar instability is traditionally treated with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a suture anchor or bone tunnel technique. Although the use of transosseous sutures was recently described for MPFL reconstruction, relevant clinical data have not been reported. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare a new transosseous suture fixation technique with the suture anchor technique for MPFL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that reconstruction with transosseous sutures would show similar clinical results to reconstruction with suture anchors. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: There were 65 patients with recurrent lateral patellar dislocations from January 2014 to December 2016 who were included in this prospective nonrandomized controlled trial. In total, 31 patients underwent MPFL reconstruction with suture anchors at the patella site (suture anchor group), while the other 34 patients underwent MPFL reconstruction with transosseous sutures (transosseous suture group). The main outcome variable (patellar redislocation) was recorded at follow-up (range, 25-60 months). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Kujala score, range of motion, congruence angle, patellar tilt, redislocation rate, and complications were collected preoperatively and/or postoperatively. RESULTS: No recurrent dislocations or other complications were observed in any of the patients. No significant differences were found at follow-up between the suture anchor and transosseous suture groups for subjective IKDC score, Kujala score, congruence angle, patellar tilt, redislocation rate, or range of motion. CONCLUSION: This short-term study showed that after MPFL reconstruction (suture anchors or transosseous sutures), patellar stability could be restored. With the numbers available, no significant differences in outcome scores were observed between patients in the transosseous suture and suture anchor groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7238809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72388092020-06-01 Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial Ye, Mao Zhang, Hangzhou Liang, Qingwei Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Patellar instability remains a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Recurrent patellar instability is traditionally treated with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a suture anchor or bone tunnel technique. Although the use of transosseous sutures was recently described for MPFL reconstruction, relevant clinical data have not been reported. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare a new transosseous suture fixation technique with the suture anchor technique for MPFL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that reconstruction with transosseous sutures would show similar clinical results to reconstruction with suture anchors. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: There were 65 patients with recurrent lateral patellar dislocations from January 2014 to December 2016 who were included in this prospective nonrandomized controlled trial. In total, 31 patients underwent MPFL reconstruction with suture anchors at the patella site (suture anchor group), while the other 34 patients underwent MPFL reconstruction with transosseous sutures (transosseous suture group). The main outcome variable (patellar redislocation) was recorded at follow-up (range, 25-60 months). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Kujala score, range of motion, congruence angle, patellar tilt, redislocation rate, and complications were collected preoperatively and/or postoperatively. RESULTS: No recurrent dislocations or other complications were observed in any of the patients. No significant differences were found at follow-up between the suture anchor and transosseous suture groups for subjective IKDC score, Kujala score, congruence angle, patellar tilt, redislocation rate, or range of motion. CONCLUSION: This short-term study showed that after MPFL reconstruction (suture anchors or transosseous sutures), patellar stability could be restored. With the numbers available, no significant differences in outcome scores were observed between patients in the transosseous suture and suture anchor groups. SAGE Publications 2020-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7238809/ /pubmed/32490023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120917112 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Ye, Mao
Zhang, Hangzhou
Liang, Qingwei
Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
title Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
title_full Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
title_short Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
title_sort clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using transosseous sutures versus suture anchors: a prospective nonrandomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120917112
work_keys_str_mv AT yemao clinicaloutcomesaftermedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionusingtransosseoussuturesversussutureanchorsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhanghangzhou clinicaloutcomesaftermedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionusingtransosseoussuturesversussutureanchorsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liangqingwei clinicaloutcomesaftermedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionusingtransosseoussuturesversussutureanchorsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial