Cargando…
Rethinking the Optimal Duration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have revolutionized the management and prognosis of fit patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, the publication of 5-year survival rates has cemented the role of ICPIs in NSCLC. An ongoing challenge is to determine the optimal treatme...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32574277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00862 |
_version_ | 1783536635622719488 |
---|---|
author | Friedlaender, Alex Kim, Chul Addeo, Alfredo |
author_facet | Friedlaender, Alex Kim, Chul Addeo, Alfredo |
author_sort | Friedlaender, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have revolutionized the management and prognosis of fit patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, the publication of 5-year survival rates has cemented the role of ICPIs in NSCLC. An ongoing challenge is to determine the optimal treatment duration to find the balance between efficacy, toxicity and cost. From the onset of ICPI trials, different durations were used, ranging from treatment until progression or toxicity, to fixed durations of 2 years. Subsequently, exploratory analyses from a 1-year fixed duration trial failed to change practice. There are, to date, no adequately powered prospective trials addressing this important question. With today's severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) pandemic, more than ever, the question resurfaces with added factors tilting the already shaky therapeutic balance. Here, we will discuss current data regarding ICPI treatment duration and incorporate this into the context of the ongoing pandemic. We conclude with a discussion of pragmatic approaches, should physicians be unable to continue standard therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7239024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72390242020-05-29 Rethinking the Optimal Duration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic Friedlaender, Alex Kim, Chul Addeo, Alfredo Front Oncol Oncology Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have revolutionized the management and prognosis of fit patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, the publication of 5-year survival rates has cemented the role of ICPIs in NSCLC. An ongoing challenge is to determine the optimal treatment duration to find the balance between efficacy, toxicity and cost. From the onset of ICPI trials, different durations were used, ranging from treatment until progression or toxicity, to fixed durations of 2 years. Subsequently, exploratory analyses from a 1-year fixed duration trial failed to change practice. There are, to date, no adequately powered prospective trials addressing this important question. With today's severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) pandemic, more than ever, the question resurfaces with added factors tilting the already shaky therapeutic balance. Here, we will discuss current data regarding ICPI treatment duration and incorporate this into the context of the ongoing pandemic. We conclude with a discussion of pragmatic approaches, should physicians be unable to continue standard therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7239024/ /pubmed/32574277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00862 Text en Copyright © 2020 Friedlaender, Kim and Addeo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Friedlaender, Alex Kim, Chul Addeo, Alfredo Rethinking the Optimal Duration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | Rethinking the Optimal Duration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Rethinking the Optimal Duration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Rethinking the Optimal Duration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking the Optimal Duration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Rethinking the Optimal Duration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | rethinking the optimal duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer throughout the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32574277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friedlaenderalex rethinkingtheoptimaldurationofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinnonsmallcelllungcancerthroughoutthecovid19pandemic AT kimchul rethinkingtheoptimaldurationofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinnonsmallcelllungcancerthroughoutthecovid19pandemic AT addeoalfredo rethinkingtheoptimaldurationofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinnonsmallcelllungcancerthroughoutthecovid19pandemic |