Cargando…
The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of perioperative complications involving artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation on rates of explantation and continence as well as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria encompassed non-neurogenic, moderate-to-s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32213204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0526 |
_version_ | 1783536661506818048 |
---|---|
author | Kretschmer, Alexander Hüsch, Tanja Anding, Ralf Pottek, Tobias Rose, Achim Struss, Werner Queissert, Fabian Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne N. Brehmer, Bernhard Haferkamp, Axel Bauer, Ricarda M. |
author_facet | Kretschmer, Alexander Hüsch, Tanja Anding, Ralf Pottek, Tobias Rose, Achim Struss, Werner Queissert, Fabian Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne N. Brehmer, Bernhard Haferkamp, Axel Bauer, Ricarda M. |
author_sort | Kretschmer, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of perioperative complications involving artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation on rates of explantation and continence as well as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria encompassed non-neurogenic, moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) post radical prostatectomy and primary implantation of an AUS performed by a high-volume surgeon (>100 previous implantations). Reporting complications followed the validated Clavien-Dindo scale and Martin criteria. HRQOL was assessed by the validated IQOL score, continence by the validated ICIQ-SF score. Statistical analysis included Chi (2) test, Mann-Whitney-U test, and multivariate regression models (p <0.05). RESULTS: 105 patients from 5 centers met the inclusion criteria. After a median follow-up of 38 months, explantation rates were 27.6% with a continence rate of 48.4%. In the age-adjusted multivariate analysis, perioperative urinary tract infection was confirmed as an independent predictor of postoperative explantation rates [OR 24.28, 95% CI 2.81-209.77, p=0.004). Salvage implantation (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.02-0.67, p=0.016) and non-prostatectomy related incontinence (OR 0.104, 95% CI 0.02-0.74, p=0.023) were independent predictors for worse continence outcomes. Low visual analogue scale scores (OR 9.999, 95% CI 1,42-70.25, p=0.021) and ICIQ-SF scores, respectively (OR 0.674, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, p=0.004) were independent predictors for increased HRQOL outcomes. Perioperative complications did not significantly impact on continence and HRQOL outcomes. CONCLUSION: Findings show postoperative infections adversely affect device survival after AUS implantation. However, if explantation can be avoided, the comparative long-term functional results and HRQOL outcomes are similar between patients with or without perioperative complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7239277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72392772020-06-15 The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence Kretschmer, Alexander Hüsch, Tanja Anding, Ralf Pottek, Tobias Rose, Achim Struss, Werner Queissert, Fabian Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne N. Brehmer, Bernhard Haferkamp, Axel Bauer, Ricarda M. Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of perioperative complications involving artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation on rates of explantation and continence as well as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria encompassed non-neurogenic, moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) post radical prostatectomy and primary implantation of an AUS performed by a high-volume surgeon (>100 previous implantations). Reporting complications followed the validated Clavien-Dindo scale and Martin criteria. HRQOL was assessed by the validated IQOL score, continence by the validated ICIQ-SF score. Statistical analysis included Chi (2) test, Mann-Whitney-U test, and multivariate regression models (p <0.05). RESULTS: 105 patients from 5 centers met the inclusion criteria. After a median follow-up of 38 months, explantation rates were 27.6% with a continence rate of 48.4%. In the age-adjusted multivariate analysis, perioperative urinary tract infection was confirmed as an independent predictor of postoperative explantation rates [OR 24.28, 95% CI 2.81-209.77, p=0.004). Salvage implantation (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.02-0.67, p=0.016) and non-prostatectomy related incontinence (OR 0.104, 95% CI 0.02-0.74, p=0.023) were independent predictors for worse continence outcomes. Low visual analogue scale scores (OR 9.999, 95% CI 1,42-70.25, p=0.021) and ICIQ-SF scores, respectively (OR 0.674, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, p=0.004) were independent predictors for increased HRQOL outcomes. Perioperative complications did not significantly impact on continence and HRQOL outcomes. CONCLUSION: Findings show postoperative infections adversely affect device survival after AUS implantation. However, if explantation can be avoided, the comparative long-term functional results and HRQOL outcomes are similar between patients with or without perioperative complications. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7239277/ /pubmed/32213204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0526 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kretschmer, Alexander Hüsch, Tanja Anding, Ralf Pottek, Tobias Rose, Achim Struss, Werner Queissert, Fabian Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne N. Brehmer, Bernhard Haferkamp, Axel Bauer, Ricarda M. The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence |
title | The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence |
title_full | The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence |
title_fullStr | The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence |
title_short | The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence |
title_sort | impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32213204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kretschmeralexander theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT huschtanja theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT andingralf theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT pottektobias theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT roseachim theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT strusswerner theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT queissertfabian theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT naumanncarstenm theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT nyarangidixjoannen theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT brehmerbernhard theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT haferkampaxel theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT bauerricardam theimpactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT kretschmeralexander impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT huschtanja impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT andingralf impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT pottektobias impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT roseachim impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT strusswerner impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT queissertfabian impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT naumanncarstenm impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT nyarangidixjoannen impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT brehmerbernhard impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT haferkampaxel impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence AT bauerricardam impactofperioperativecomplicationsonfavorableoutcomesafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationforpostprostatectomyincontinence |