Cargando…

Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Neurostimulants may improve or accelerate cognitive and functional recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ischemic stroke (IS), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but few studies have described their safety and effectiveness in the intensive care unit (ICU). The objectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leclerc, Angela M., Riker, Richard R., Brown, Caitlin S., May, Teresa, Nocella, Kristina, Cote, Jennifer, Eldridge, Ashley, Seder, David B., Gagnon, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00986-4
_version_ 1783536674187247616
author Leclerc, Angela M.
Riker, Richard R.
Brown, Caitlin S.
May, Teresa
Nocella, Kristina
Cote, Jennifer
Eldridge, Ashley
Seder, David B.
Gagnon, David J.
author_facet Leclerc, Angela M.
Riker, Richard R.
Brown, Caitlin S.
May, Teresa
Nocella, Kristina
Cote, Jennifer
Eldridge, Ashley
Seder, David B.
Gagnon, David J.
author_sort Leclerc, Angela M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Neurostimulants may improve or accelerate cognitive and functional recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ischemic stroke (IS), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but few studies have described their safety and effectiveness in the intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this study was to describe amantadine and modafinil administration practices during acute stroke care starting in the ICU and to evaluate safety and effectiveness. METHODS: Consecutive adult ICU patients treated with amantadine and/or modafinil following acute non-traumatic IS, ICH, or SAH were evaluated. Neurostimulant administration data were extracted from the electronic medication administration record, including medication (amantadine, modafinil, or both), starting dose, time from stroke to initiation, and whether the neurostimulant was continued at hospital discharge. Patients were considered responders if they met two of three criteria within 9 days of neurostimulant initiation: increase in Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score ≥ 3 points from pre-treatment baseline, improved wakefulness or participation documented in caregiver notes, or clinical improvement documented in physical or occupational therapy notes. Potential confounders of the effectiveness assessment and adverse drug effects were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were evaluable during the 3.7-year study period, including 41 (47%) with ICH, 29 (33%) with IS, and 17 (20%) with SAH. The initial neurostimulant administered was amantadine in 71 (82%) patients, modafinil in 13 (15%), or both in 3 (3%) patients. Neurostimulants were initiated a median of 7 (4.25, 12.75) days post-stroke (range 1–27 days) for somnolence (77%), not following commands (32%), lack of eye opening (28%), or low GCS (17%). The most common starting dose was 100 mg twice daily for both amantadine (86%) and modafinil (54%). Of the 79 patients included in the effectiveness evaluation, 42 (53%) were considered responders, including 34/62 (55%) receiving amantadine monotherapy and 8/24 (33%) receiving both amantadine and modafinil at the time they met the definition of a responder. No patient receiving modafinil monotherapy was considered a responder. The median time from initiation to response was 3 (2, 5) days. Responders were more frequently discharged home or to acute rehabilitation compared to non-responders (90% vs 62%, p = 0.006). Among survivors, 63/72 (88%) were prescribed a neurostimulant at hospital discharge. The most common potential adverse drug effect was sleep disruption (16%). CONCLUSIONS: Neurostimulant administration during acute stroke care may improve wakefulness. Future controlled studies with a neurostimulant administration protocol, prospective evaluation, and discretely defined response and safety criteria are needed to confirm these encouraging findings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12028-020-00986-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7239352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72393522020-05-20 Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients Leclerc, Angela M. Riker, Richard R. Brown, Caitlin S. May, Teresa Nocella, Kristina Cote, Jennifer Eldridge, Ashley Seder, David B. Gagnon, David J. Neurocrit Care Original Work BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Neurostimulants may improve or accelerate cognitive and functional recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ischemic stroke (IS), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but few studies have described their safety and effectiveness in the intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this study was to describe amantadine and modafinil administration practices during acute stroke care starting in the ICU and to evaluate safety and effectiveness. METHODS: Consecutive adult ICU patients treated with amantadine and/or modafinil following acute non-traumatic IS, ICH, or SAH were evaluated. Neurostimulant administration data were extracted from the electronic medication administration record, including medication (amantadine, modafinil, or both), starting dose, time from stroke to initiation, and whether the neurostimulant was continued at hospital discharge. Patients were considered responders if they met two of three criteria within 9 days of neurostimulant initiation: increase in Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score ≥ 3 points from pre-treatment baseline, improved wakefulness or participation documented in caregiver notes, or clinical improvement documented in physical or occupational therapy notes. Potential confounders of the effectiveness assessment and adverse drug effects were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were evaluable during the 3.7-year study period, including 41 (47%) with ICH, 29 (33%) with IS, and 17 (20%) with SAH. The initial neurostimulant administered was amantadine in 71 (82%) patients, modafinil in 13 (15%), or both in 3 (3%) patients. Neurostimulants were initiated a median of 7 (4.25, 12.75) days post-stroke (range 1–27 days) for somnolence (77%), not following commands (32%), lack of eye opening (28%), or low GCS (17%). The most common starting dose was 100 mg twice daily for both amantadine (86%) and modafinil (54%). Of the 79 patients included in the effectiveness evaluation, 42 (53%) were considered responders, including 34/62 (55%) receiving amantadine monotherapy and 8/24 (33%) receiving both amantadine and modafinil at the time they met the definition of a responder. No patient receiving modafinil monotherapy was considered a responder. The median time from initiation to response was 3 (2, 5) days. Responders were more frequently discharged home or to acute rehabilitation compared to non-responders (90% vs 62%, p = 0.006). Among survivors, 63/72 (88%) were prescribed a neurostimulant at hospital discharge. The most common potential adverse drug effect was sleep disruption (16%). CONCLUSIONS: Neurostimulant administration during acute stroke care may improve wakefulness. Future controlled studies with a neurostimulant administration protocol, prospective evaluation, and discretely defined response and safety criteria are needed to confirm these encouraging findings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12028-020-00986-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-05-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7239352/ /pubmed/32435964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00986-4 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Work
Leclerc, Angela M.
Riker, Richard R.
Brown, Caitlin S.
May, Teresa
Nocella, Kristina
Cote, Jennifer
Eldridge, Ashley
Seder, David B.
Gagnon, David J.
Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients
title Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_full Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_fullStr Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_full_unstemmed Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_short Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients
title_sort amantadine and modafinil as neurostimulants following acute stroke: a retrospective study of intensive care unit patients
topic Original Work
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00986-4
work_keys_str_mv AT leclercangelam amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients
AT rikerrichardr amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients
AT browncaitlins amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients
AT mayteresa amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients
AT nocellakristina amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients
AT cotejennifer amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients
AT eldridgeashley amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients
AT sederdavidb amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients
AT gagnondavidj amantadineandmodafinilasneurostimulantsfollowingacutestrokearetrospectivestudyofintensivecareunitpatients