Cargando…

Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?

CONTEXT: Chest radiographs have been used worldwide as a screening tool before employment and training, by various healthcare and other government and nongovernment institutions. Many studies done in the past have demonstrated a relatively low yield for tuberculosis detection and therefore, the auth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasper, A, Gibikote, S, Kirupakaran, H, Christopher, DJ, Mathews, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32270779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_462_19
_version_ 1783536682123919360
author Jasper, A
Gibikote, S
Kirupakaran, H
Christopher, DJ
Mathews, P
author_facet Jasper, A
Gibikote, S
Kirupakaran, H
Christopher, DJ
Mathews, P
author_sort Jasper, A
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Chest radiographs have been used worldwide as a screening tool before employment and training, by various healthcare and other government and nongovernment institutions. Many studies done in the past have demonstrated a relatively low yield for tuberculosis detection and therefore, the authors have questioned this practice. AIMS: To compare the value of the preadmission/employment chest radiograph in two groups, namely, those who have been previously exposed to a healthcare setting (post-exposure group) and those who have not been exposed (pre-exposure group) and to determine if there is a significant difference in tuberculosis detection between these two groups. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective review of the reports of the chest radiographs of all candidates appearing for admission to various undergraduate and postgraduate courses in our institute between 2014 and 2017 was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The various abnormalities detected were recorded and the findings in the two groups were compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test was used to compare between two group proportions. RESULTS: Thirty out of 4333 (0.69%) candidates in the pre-exposure group and 53 out of 3379 (1.57%) candidates in the post-exposure group showed abnormalities on chest radiographs involving the lung parenchyma, mediastinum, heart, or pleura. In the pre-exposure group, six (0.14%) were found to have underlying cardiac disease and one (0.02%) had tuberculosis. Among the six candidates in the post-exposure group who underwent further investigations in our institute, five (0.15%) were diagnosed to have tuberculosis. Although there was no statistically significant difference in tuberculosis detection between the groups (P = 0.051), there is a trend towards higher detection of tuberculosis in the post-exposure group. CONCLUSIONS: In a country where the prevalence of tuberculosis is high, the pre-employment chest radiograph may still have a role in detecting tuberculosis in the post-exposure group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7239409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72394092020-05-29 Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country? Jasper, A Gibikote, S Kirupakaran, H Christopher, DJ Mathews, P J Postgrad Med Original Article CONTEXT: Chest radiographs have been used worldwide as a screening tool before employment and training, by various healthcare and other government and nongovernment institutions. Many studies done in the past have demonstrated a relatively low yield for tuberculosis detection and therefore, the authors have questioned this practice. AIMS: To compare the value of the preadmission/employment chest radiograph in two groups, namely, those who have been previously exposed to a healthcare setting (post-exposure group) and those who have not been exposed (pre-exposure group) and to determine if there is a significant difference in tuberculosis detection between these two groups. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective review of the reports of the chest radiographs of all candidates appearing for admission to various undergraduate and postgraduate courses in our institute between 2014 and 2017 was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The various abnormalities detected were recorded and the findings in the two groups were compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test was used to compare between two group proportions. RESULTS: Thirty out of 4333 (0.69%) candidates in the pre-exposure group and 53 out of 3379 (1.57%) candidates in the post-exposure group showed abnormalities on chest radiographs involving the lung parenchyma, mediastinum, heart, or pleura. In the pre-exposure group, six (0.14%) were found to have underlying cardiac disease and one (0.02%) had tuberculosis. Among the six candidates in the post-exposure group who underwent further investigations in our institute, five (0.15%) were diagnosed to have tuberculosis. Although there was no statistically significant difference in tuberculosis detection between the groups (P = 0.051), there is a trend towards higher detection of tuberculosis in the post-exposure group. CONCLUSIONS: In a country where the prevalence of tuberculosis is high, the pre-employment chest radiograph may still have a role in detecting tuberculosis in the post-exposure group. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7239409/ /pubmed/32270779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_462_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Postgraduate Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jasper, A
Gibikote, S
Kirupakaran, H
Christopher, DJ
Mathews, P
Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?
title Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?
title_full Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?
title_fullStr Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?
title_full_unstemmed Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?
title_short Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?
title_sort is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32270779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_462_19
work_keys_str_mv AT jaspera isroutinepreentrychestradiographnecessaryinahightuberculosisprevalencecountry
AT gibikotes isroutinepreentrychestradiographnecessaryinahightuberculosisprevalencecountry
AT kirupakaranh isroutinepreentrychestradiographnecessaryinahightuberculosisprevalencecountry
AT christopherdj isroutinepreentrychestradiographnecessaryinahightuberculosisprevalencecountry
AT mathewsp isroutinepreentrychestradiographnecessaryinahightuberculosisprevalencecountry