Cargando…

Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the flow and filling ability of endodontic materials using different test models

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the flow and filling of several retrograde filling materials using new different test models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Glass plates were manufactured with a central cavity and 4 grooves in the horizontal and vertical directions. Grooves with the dimensions used in the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres, Fernanda Ferrari Esteves, Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria, Chavez-Andrade, Gisselle Moraima, Pinto, Jader Camilo, Berbert, Fábio Luiz Camargo Villela, Tanomaru-Filho, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32483530
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e11
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This study compared the flow and filling of several retrograde filling materials using new different test models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Glass plates were manufactured with a central cavity and 4 grooves in the horizontal and vertical directions. Grooves with the dimensions used in the previous study (1 × 1 × 2 mm; length, width, and height respectively) were compared with grooves measuring 1 × 1 × 1 and 1 × 2 × 1 mm. Biodentine, intermediate restorative material (IRM), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) were evaluated. Each material was placed in the central cavity, and then another glass plate and a metal weight were placed over the cement. The glass plate/material set was scanned using micro-computed tomography. Flow was calculated by linear measurements in the grooves. Central filling was calculated in the central cavity (mm(3)) and lateral filling was measured up to 2 mm from the central cavity. RESULTS: Biodentine presented the least flow and better filling than IRM when evaluated in the 1 × 1 × 2 model. In a comparison of the test models, MTA had the most flow in the 1 × 1 × 2 model. All materials had lower lateral filling when the 1 × 1 × 2 model was used. CONCLUSIONS: Flow and filling were affected by the size of the test models. Higher grooves and materials with greater flow resulted in lower filling capacity. The test model measuring 1 × 1 × 2 mm showed a better ability to differentiate among the materials.