Cargando…
Clinical validation of urinary indole-reacted calcium oxalate crystallization index (iCOCI) test for diagnosing calcium oxalate urolithiasis
An indole-reacted calcium oxalate crystallization index (iCOCI) test was developed to quantify the total competence of urine to precipitate calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals. We conducted the prospective cohort study in accordance with the STARD guideline to evaluate the accuracy of urinary iCOCI test...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32433482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65244-1 |
Sumario: | An indole-reacted calcium oxalate crystallization index (iCOCI) test was developed to quantify the total competence of urine to precipitate calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals. We conducted the prospective cohort study in accordance with the STARD guideline to evaluate the accuracy of urinary iCOCI test (index test) for diagnosing urolithiasis. A total of 281 participants were recruited for the study. Levels of urinary iCOCI were determined in the pre-diagnostic 24-h urine samples. Positive urinary iCOCI (≥ 0.6 COM eqv., g/L) was accounted for 51% (144/281), and the rest of 49% (137/281) were negative. Non-contrast CT imaging (reference standard) was subsequently performed for the definite diagnosis of urolithiasis to divide the participants into two groups, non-stone subjects (NSS, n = 122) and stone-forming subjects (SFS, n = 159). It should be noted that only subjects who currently had urinary stone at the time of study were classified as SFS. Urinary iCOCI levels in the SFS were significantly higher than the NSS. ROC analysis revealed an area under curve (AUC) of 0.893 (95% CI: 0.855–0.932) in separating NSS from all SFS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (LH(+)) and negative likelihood ratio (LH(−)) of urinary iCOCI test for diagnosis of all urolithiasis were 87%, 80%, 84%, 84%, 83%, 4.44 and 0.16, respectively. Of 159 SFS, 38 were confirmed to have CaOx stones. Among these 38 CaOx SFS, only 2 had negative urinary iCOCI test. The AUC of urinary iCOCI test for separating CaOx SFS from NSS was markedly high (0.946, 95% CI: 0.914–0.978). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, LH(+) and LH(−) of urinary iCOCI test for diagnosing CaOx urolithiasis were 95%, 86%, 68%, 98%, 88%, 6.80 and 0.06, respectively. Conclusion, we clinically validated that an innovative non-invasive urinary iCOCI test was highly accurate to diagnose urolithiasis, especially CaOx stone. With its high sensitivity and NPV, urinary iCOCI test is clinically intended to use as a screening test for CaOx urolithiasis. LH(−) of 0.06 indicates that negative result of urinary iCOCI test is highly accurate to rule out the CaOx stone formation. It is noted that urinary iCOCI level is expressed as arbitrary unit, and it is not directly related to the actual physiological level of urinary oxalate. |
---|