Cargando…

Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions

BACKGROUND: Reconstructing maxillofacial defects is quite challenging for most surgeons due to the region’s complex anatomy and cosmetic and functional effects on patients. The use of pre-made alloplastic implants and autogenous grafts is often associated with resorption, infection, and displacement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alasseri, Nasser, Alasraj, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32467823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00262-7
_version_ 1783536788700135424
author Alasseri, Nasser
Alasraj, Ahmed
author_facet Alasseri, Nasser
Alasraj, Ahmed
author_sort Alasseri, Nasser
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reconstructing maxillofacial defects is quite challenging for most surgeons due to the region’s complex anatomy and cosmetic and functional effects on patients. The use of pre-made alloplastic implants and autogenous grafts is often associated with resorption, infection, and displacement. Recent technological advances have led to the use of custom computer-designed patient-specific implants (PSIs) in reconstructive surgery. This study describes our experience with PSI, details the complications we faced, how to overcome them, and finally, evaluates patient satisfaction. CASE PRESENTATION: Six patients underwent reconstruction of various maxillofacial defects arising due to different etiologies using PSI. A combined total of 10 implants was used. PEEK was used to fabricate 8, while titanium was used to fabricate 2. No complications were seen in any patient both immediately post-op and in subsequent follow-ups. All patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the final result both functionally and cosmetically. CONCLUSION: The use of computer-designed PSI enables a more accurate reconstruction of maxillofacial defects, eliminating the usual complications seen in preformed implants and resulting in higher patient satisfaction. Its main drawback is its high cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7239988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72399882020-05-27 Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions Alasseri, Nasser Alasraj, Ahmed Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Case Report BACKGROUND: Reconstructing maxillofacial defects is quite challenging for most surgeons due to the region’s complex anatomy and cosmetic and functional effects on patients. The use of pre-made alloplastic implants and autogenous grafts is often associated with resorption, infection, and displacement. Recent technological advances have led to the use of custom computer-designed patient-specific implants (PSIs) in reconstructive surgery. This study describes our experience with PSI, details the complications we faced, how to overcome them, and finally, evaluates patient satisfaction. CASE PRESENTATION: Six patients underwent reconstruction of various maxillofacial defects arising due to different etiologies using PSI. A combined total of 10 implants was used. PEEK was used to fabricate 8, while titanium was used to fabricate 2. No complications were seen in any patient both immediately post-op and in subsequent follow-ups. All patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the final result both functionally and cosmetically. CONCLUSION: The use of computer-designed PSI enables a more accurate reconstruction of maxillofacial defects, eliminating the usual complications seen in preformed implants and resulting in higher patient satisfaction. Its main drawback is its high cost. Springer Singapore 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7239988/ /pubmed/32467823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00262-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Case Report
Alasseri, Nasser
Alasraj, Ahmed
Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
title Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
title_full Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
title_fullStr Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
title_full_unstemmed Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
title_short Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
title_sort patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32467823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00262-7
work_keys_str_mv AT alasserinasser patientspecificimplantsformaxillofacialdefectschallengesandsolutions
AT alasrajahmed patientspecificimplantsformaxillofacialdefectschallengesandsolutions