Cargando…
Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
BACKGROUND: Reconstructing maxillofacial defects is quite challenging for most surgeons due to the region’s complex anatomy and cosmetic and functional effects on patients. The use of pre-made alloplastic implants and autogenous grafts is often associated with resorption, infection, and displacement...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32467823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00262-7 |
_version_ | 1783536788700135424 |
---|---|
author | Alasseri, Nasser Alasraj, Ahmed |
author_facet | Alasseri, Nasser Alasraj, Ahmed |
author_sort | Alasseri, Nasser |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reconstructing maxillofacial defects is quite challenging for most surgeons due to the region’s complex anatomy and cosmetic and functional effects on patients. The use of pre-made alloplastic implants and autogenous grafts is often associated with resorption, infection, and displacement. Recent technological advances have led to the use of custom computer-designed patient-specific implants (PSIs) in reconstructive surgery. This study describes our experience with PSI, details the complications we faced, how to overcome them, and finally, evaluates patient satisfaction. CASE PRESENTATION: Six patients underwent reconstruction of various maxillofacial defects arising due to different etiologies using PSI. A combined total of 10 implants was used. PEEK was used to fabricate 8, while titanium was used to fabricate 2. No complications were seen in any patient both immediately post-op and in subsequent follow-ups. All patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the final result both functionally and cosmetically. CONCLUSION: The use of computer-designed PSI enables a more accurate reconstruction of maxillofacial defects, eliminating the usual complications seen in preformed implants and resulting in higher patient satisfaction. Its main drawback is its high cost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7239988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72399882020-05-27 Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions Alasseri, Nasser Alasraj, Ahmed Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Case Report BACKGROUND: Reconstructing maxillofacial defects is quite challenging for most surgeons due to the region’s complex anatomy and cosmetic and functional effects on patients. The use of pre-made alloplastic implants and autogenous grafts is often associated with resorption, infection, and displacement. Recent technological advances have led to the use of custom computer-designed patient-specific implants (PSIs) in reconstructive surgery. This study describes our experience with PSI, details the complications we faced, how to overcome them, and finally, evaluates patient satisfaction. CASE PRESENTATION: Six patients underwent reconstruction of various maxillofacial defects arising due to different etiologies using PSI. A combined total of 10 implants was used. PEEK was used to fabricate 8, while titanium was used to fabricate 2. No complications were seen in any patient both immediately post-op and in subsequent follow-ups. All patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the final result both functionally and cosmetically. CONCLUSION: The use of computer-designed PSI enables a more accurate reconstruction of maxillofacial defects, eliminating the usual complications seen in preformed implants and resulting in higher patient satisfaction. Its main drawback is its high cost. Springer Singapore 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7239988/ /pubmed/32467823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00262-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Alasseri, Nasser Alasraj, Ahmed Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions |
title | Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions |
title_full | Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions |
title_fullStr | Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions |
title_short | Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions |
title_sort | patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32467823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00262-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alasserinasser patientspecificimplantsformaxillofacialdefectschallengesandsolutions AT alasrajahmed patientspecificimplantsformaxillofacialdefectschallengesandsolutions |