Cargando…

Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients

Background: In-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains high. The only adequately powered randomized trial showed no benefit of routine use of the intra-aortic balloon pump in AMI-CS. We compared individually predicted mortality using CardShock- an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schäfer, Andreas, Werner, Nikos, Burkhoff, Daniel, Sieweke, Jan-Thorben, Zietzer, Andreas, Masyuk, Maryna, Junker Udesen, Nanna Louise, Westenfeld, Ralf, Møller, Jacob Eifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00074
_version_ 1783536791319478272
author Schäfer, Andreas
Werner, Nikos
Burkhoff, Daniel
Sieweke, Jan-Thorben
Zietzer, Andreas
Masyuk, Maryna
Junker Udesen, Nanna Louise
Westenfeld, Ralf
Møller, Jacob Eifer
author_facet Schäfer, Andreas
Werner, Nikos
Burkhoff, Daniel
Sieweke, Jan-Thorben
Zietzer, Andreas
Masyuk, Maryna
Junker Udesen, Nanna Louise
Westenfeld, Ralf
Møller, Jacob Eifer
author_sort Schäfer, Andreas
collection PubMed
description Background: In-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains high. The only adequately powered randomized trial showed no benefit of routine use of the intra-aortic balloon pump in AMI-CS. We compared individually predicted mortality using CardShock- and IABP-Shock II-scores in AMI-CS patients treated with an Impella microaxial pump, who met the IABP-Shock II-trials inclusion/exclusion criteria, to observed mortality on circulatory support in order to determine whether standardized use of an Impella microaxial flow-pump in AMI-CS is associated with lower than predicted mortality rates and whether timing of implantation or selecting patients based on predicted risk is meaningful. Methods and Results: We analyzed data from 166 consecutive Impella-treated AMI-CS patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the IABP-Shock II-trial (age 64 ± 11 years). Thirty-nine percentage of 64 patients had been resuscitated before Impella implantation. Overall 30-day mortality was 42%. Mortality was higher in resuscitated patients (50 vs. 36%, p = 0.0452) and when Impella was implanted post-PCI (Impella-pre-PCI: 28%, Impella-post-PCI: 51%, p = 0.0039). While in both score systems there was no significant difference between predicted and observed overall 30-day mortality, predicted mortality was significantly higher than observed mortality on Impella support only for individuals with highest predicted risk based on CardShock score (predicted 77 vs. observed 51%, p = 0.025). Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis suggests that the use of the Impella microaxial pump may be effective in selected cases of high risk patients with AMI-CS. Condensed abstract: Mortality is high in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock despite rapid revascularization. Haemodynamic support with an intraortic balloon pump does not reduce mortality. In this retrospective registry including 166 consecutive IABP-Shock II-eligible cardiogenic shock patients in four dedicated shock centers, observed mortality on circulatory support with an Impella was significantly lower than predicted in patients with highest mortality risk. Implantation prior to PCI in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock seemed to be associated with lower mortality than implantation post PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7240000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72400002020-05-29 Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients Schäfer, Andreas Werner, Nikos Burkhoff, Daniel Sieweke, Jan-Thorben Zietzer, Andreas Masyuk, Maryna Junker Udesen, Nanna Louise Westenfeld, Ralf Møller, Jacob Eifer Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: In-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains high. The only adequately powered randomized trial showed no benefit of routine use of the intra-aortic balloon pump in AMI-CS. We compared individually predicted mortality using CardShock- and IABP-Shock II-scores in AMI-CS patients treated with an Impella microaxial pump, who met the IABP-Shock II-trials inclusion/exclusion criteria, to observed mortality on circulatory support in order to determine whether standardized use of an Impella microaxial flow-pump in AMI-CS is associated with lower than predicted mortality rates and whether timing of implantation or selecting patients based on predicted risk is meaningful. Methods and Results: We analyzed data from 166 consecutive Impella-treated AMI-CS patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the IABP-Shock II-trial (age 64 ± 11 years). Thirty-nine percentage of 64 patients had been resuscitated before Impella implantation. Overall 30-day mortality was 42%. Mortality was higher in resuscitated patients (50 vs. 36%, p = 0.0452) and when Impella was implanted post-PCI (Impella-pre-PCI: 28%, Impella-post-PCI: 51%, p = 0.0039). While in both score systems there was no significant difference between predicted and observed overall 30-day mortality, predicted mortality was significantly higher than observed mortality on Impella support only for individuals with highest predicted risk based on CardShock score (predicted 77 vs. observed 51%, p = 0.025). Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis suggests that the use of the Impella microaxial pump may be effective in selected cases of high risk patients with AMI-CS. Condensed abstract: Mortality is high in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock despite rapid revascularization. Haemodynamic support with an intraortic balloon pump does not reduce mortality. In this retrospective registry including 166 consecutive IABP-Shock II-eligible cardiogenic shock patients in four dedicated shock centers, observed mortality on circulatory support with an Impella was significantly lower than predicted in patients with highest mortality risk. Implantation prior to PCI in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock seemed to be associated with lower mortality than implantation post PCI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7240000/ /pubmed/32478095 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00074 Text en Copyright © 2020 Schäfer, Werner, Burkhoff, Sieweke, Zietzer, Masyuk, Junker Udesen, Westenfeld and Møller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Schäfer, Andreas
Werner, Nikos
Burkhoff, Daniel
Sieweke, Jan-Thorben
Zietzer, Andreas
Masyuk, Maryna
Junker Udesen, Nanna Louise
Westenfeld, Ralf
Møller, Jacob Eifer
Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_full Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_fullStr Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_short Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_sort influence of timing and predicted risk on mortality in impella-treated infarct-related cardiogenic shock patients
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00074
work_keys_str_mv AT schaferandreas influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients
AT wernernikos influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients
AT burkhoffdaniel influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients
AT siewekejanthorben influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients
AT zietzerandreas influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients
AT masyukmaryna influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients
AT junkerudesennannalouise influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients
AT westenfeldralf influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients
AT møllerjacobeifer influenceoftimingandpredictedriskonmortalityinimpellatreatedinfarctrelatedcardiogenicshockpatients